• A-Z
  • Directory
  • myUVM
  • Loading search...

Home – Child Mental Health Blog

Parental Bed Sharing with Infants More Popular

Posted: October 8th, 2013 by David Rettew

Parents co-sleeping with their infants is a common and accepted practice worldwide.  In response to data linking co-sleeping with an increased rate of sudden infant death syndrome, however, the American Academy of Pediatrics since 1992 has recommended that infants share a room but not a bed with their infants.    This recent study from the journal JAMA Pediatrics utilizes data from the National Infant Sleep Position study to examine the rates of infant bed sharing from 1993 to 2000 and factors related to the practice.Cosleeping

Participants in this study were a national sample of parents (80% mothers) of infants 7 months or younger who were identified from a commercial list and contacted by phone.  The final sample of nearly 19,000 individuals was more likely to be Caucasian, older, and well educated compared to national norms.  Participation rates varied widely from year to year and generally got worse from 1993 to 2010.  Subjects were asked if a parent or guardian usually sleeps with the child.  They were also asked if the topic was discussed with their doctor and if the physician’s attitude was positive or negative.  The median infant age was about 4.5 months.

Results showed that, 0verall, 11.2% of parents reported that they usually slept with their infant.  The prevalence rose 6.5% in 1993 to 13.5% in 2010.  Race appeared to be strongly liked with infant bed sharing.  In 2010, nearly 40% of black infants slept with a parent compared to just under 10% of white infants.  This point was highlighted by the authors as the rate of SIDS is also higher in African American families.

Infant bed sharing was also found to be related to the following factors:  lower level of education and income, younger infant age, preterm birth, and geography (higher in the west and south).

Regarding conversations with their doctor, a total of 54% of the sample reported no input from their physician.  Of those who did receive advice, nearly three-quarters reported being advised against the practice.  Parents who were cautioned against the practice were less likely to share a bed with their child (or perhaps were less likely to admit it).

The authors suggested that more frequent and consistent advice from physicians could help change practices to be more in line with recommendations.  An accompanying editorial, however, describes some problems with the data on which these recommendations are made, suggesting that it may be premature to condemn this practice based on the available evidence.  It has been suggested that other factors, such as paternal substance use or infant sleeping in other places such as sofas, may be more moderating factors to consider in the link between cosleeping and SIDS.

Reference

Colson E, et al.  Trends and Factors Associated With Infant Bed Sharing, 1993-2010: The National Infant Sleep Position Study.  JAMA Pediatrics 2013; published online Sept 20.

 

Talking About Obesity in the Age of Eating Disorders

Posted: September 30th, 2013 by David Rettew

A common issue that comes up as parents and clinicians try to help adolescents avoid both eating disorders and obesity is the concern that a conversation about obesity with a child might trigger eating disorder behaviors.  The dilemma leads to a lot of discomfort as to the best way to have this conversation, if at all.Eating Discussion

Directly addressing this question are some new survey data from the Eating and Activity in Teens Study and the Project Families and Eating and Activities in Teens Project.  Over 2000 teens from 20 public schools around the Minneapolis/St Paul area were assessed using school based surveys while parents also completed questionnaires.  The mean age of the adolescents was 14.4 years and the sample was ethnically diverse with 81% from an ethnic minority and most coming from lower income households.

Most parents reported engaging in some kind of conversation with their children about eating behaviors.  For one-third of parents of nonoverweight teens, these discussions were focused on weight.  For parents of overweight teens, the rate rose to 60%.  Compared to conversations about healthy eating, maternal discussions focused on weight were significantly more likely to be associated with dieting and unhealthy weight control behaviors for both overweight (64% versus 40%) and nonoverweight teens (39% versus 30%). However, the difference in rate of extreme unhealthy weight control behaviors was not different among adolescents whose mothers discussed healthy eating (8.5%) versus weight (9.5%).  Similar but not identical trends emerged for fathers.

The authors concluded that parents should have conversations related to healthy eating rather than weight, particularly with adolescents who are overweight.

While this is an interesting study that offers data about a common clinical dilemma, one needs to be mindful not to overinterpret these findings.  While much of the attention for this article relates to eating disorders per se, significant associations were not generally found between the content of parental eating discussions and more extreme weight loss behavior, and eating disorders were not diagnosed directly in this sample. Furthermore, eating disorder symptoms were quite common among teens whose parents focused their discussions on healthy eating too. Parents may also have under-reported the amount of weight focus of their conversations.

That said, the study does offer some empirical support to a practice that many clinicians already advocate, namely to make weight a secondary issue and instead focus on more healthy eating.

Reference

Berge J, et al., Parent Conversations About Healthful Eating and Weight: Associations With Adolescent Disordered Eating Behaviors.  JAMA Pediatrics 2013;167(8):746-753.

New Option for Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in Burlington, VT

Posted: September 25th, 2013 by David Rettew

Spectrum Youth and Family Services announced a new program called Teen Intervention Program for Substance Use (TIPS) that will provide for intake assessment followed by a 26-week treatment program for adolescents with substance abuse problems aged 12-18. Spectrum

The treatment is family-based and uses a motivational and behavioral framework.  Parents need to attend and be involved in the fourteen 90-minute sessions. There is no group therapy component, but there will be verification of substance use through breathalyzers and urine drug screens.

After five sessions, this program is FREE for participants, as the treatment is part of an NIH funded research study, looking at ways to improve outpatient substance use treatment.  The study will be led by Spectrum’s Associate Director Annie Ramniceanu along with two Dartmouth (and previously UVM) psychologists Dr. Cathy Stanger and Dr. Alan Budney.   Of note, there is no “waitlist control” arm of the study and all participants will receive active treatment.

This looks to be a great opportunity for intensive evidence-based treatment for one of Vermont’s most entrenched problems.

More information can be found here.

Self and professional referrals can be made by calling (802) 864-7423 ext 319.

Primary Care Phone and Email Consultation Program Begins Second Year

Posted: September 19th, 2013 by David Rettew

The Vermont Center for Children, Youth and Families at FAHC/UVM, in partnership with VCHIP, is pleased to announce we are entering our second year of the Child Psychiatric Phone and Email Consultation Program.  The goal of this program is to provide healthcare providers with curbside phone and email consultation to assist in the management of emotional and behavioral problems in primary care settings.  Examples of these consultations include assisting in assessment, diagnosis, medication management and Family Wellness recommendations.Consult program

Results taken from a questionnaire given before and after PCP’s have accessed our consultation service show that users confirm an increased ability to quickly access expert psychiatric consultation as well as experience an increase in confidence in diagnosing and treating children’s mental health issues.

Whether you are already “signed up” or familiar with our consultation services or hearing about them for the first time please review the below commitment.

We will:

1)      Assign one of our child psychiatry team members to be your direct contact at the VCCYF for phone and E-mail consultation.  Members of our team will return phone calls within 24 hours during the regular work week (weekend coverage is already available through the on call system).

2)      Provide you and your staff with phone and E-mail access to our experienced Family Wellness Coach, Eliza Pillard, LICSW, who can help guide your practice in the search for evidence based interventions for emotional and behavioral problems on behalf of your patients.

3)      Connect you to our VCCYF Primary Care blog which delivers regular postings on topics that may be relevant for your patients, such as updates on child mental health and family wellness research.

4)      Update all participants with news of access to our services (e.g., our Autism Assessment Clinic), educational opportunities, and advances in our field.

Please note that this program will not serve as a rapid conduit for in-person assessment and consultation at the VCCYF.  In fairness to the many families in need, we are obligated to serve families on a first-come-first-serve basis.

If you are interested in this program, please contact Eliza at eliza.pillard@vtmednet.org.  We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jim Hudziak, MD, Director

Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families

 

Eliza Pillard, LICSW

Family Wellness Coach

Limiting Antipsychotic Medications Shows Long-Term Benefits

Posted: September 16th, 2013 by David Rettew

The renewed debate surrounding the risk/benefit ratio of using antipsychotic medications for new onset psychotic illness has challenged the traditional recommendation of continued medication treatment for at least one year after remission.  While previous studies have documented an increased rates of relapse among those whose medications are discontinued, this risk is weighed against the potential adverse effects of theseAntipsychotic reduction medications and continued questions about long-term efficacy. Into this discussion are now some much needed data that examine the longitudinal outcomes of a group of patients who medications were reduced or discontinued versus those who received maintenance treatment.

In the original trial, a group of 257 subjects with first episode psychosis who had remitted and stayed well for 6 months were randomized into a group that received maintenance treatment and a group that underwent dose reduction or discontinuation.  These groupings were maintained for 18 months, with analyses showing  little added benefit for the dose reduction group. For this follow-up study, 103 patients from the original sample were followed for a total of 7 years during which time medications could be modified at the judgment of the clinical team.  The primary outcome variable for the study was recovery which was defined as symptomatic and functional remission.

Patients in the dose reduction/discontinuation group showed a rate of recovery of 40.4% which was significantly above the 18.7% rate in the maintenance group. Rates of functional remission, but not symptomatic remission, were also significantly higher at 7 year follow-up for the dose reduction/discontinuation group. The mean dose during the final two years of the follow-up period of those in the dose reduction/discontinuation group remained significantly lower than the maintenance group (3.60 versus 2.27 mg/day of haloperidol equivalent), despite that fact that subjects in both groups were able to be treated as clinically indicated.   A total of 11 patients were not using any antipsychotic medication in the last two years of follow-up.

The authors concluded that dose reduction/discontinuation provides superior long term recovery rates in comparison to conventional maintenance treatment.

This study shows some striking advantages of dose reduction/discontinuation that were not evident in the original study after 18 months of randomization.  It suggests that while achieving dose reduction or discontinuation can be difficult, there may be some long term benefits. The authors state that additional data confirming these findings are needed before such a strategy is put into general clinical use.  It is also worth noting that medications continued to be used for most patients in the dose reduction/continuation group, albeit as lower doses.

Recent Child Mental Health Summit Explores New Ideas

Posted: September 10th, 2013 by David Rettew

This week, a group of people involved in all aspects of child mental health care in Vermont met in Shelburne to share ideas and visions about how to improve access and quality of behavioral healthcare for Vermont families.  The group included parents of children struggling with emotional behavioral problems, counselors, psychiatrists, primary care clinicians, educators, and leaders from many community mental health centers, among others.  The project was sponsored jointly by the United Way and Fletcher Allen after child mental health care was identified an a particular area of need.Summit

Small groups first discussed the hopes and goals we had for children and their families, with solid agreement that mental health meant much more than simply an absence of symptoms.  From there, specific priorities and strategies to help children thrive were explored.  In my own view, what seemed to rise to the top for many people was the idea that resources needed to be more focused on supporting entire families who are often under great stress.  Another common theme was to use technology to allow both families and those in the mental health community to see in one place what types of programs, providers, and other types resources might be available.   Related to this concept was the idea to improve the coordination and information sharing from one organization to the next.

One often acknowledged obstacle to these lofty ideas is funding, as it was widely recognized that increasing access, reducing waitlists, and extending the reach of this hard working community all require child mental health to be recognized as a  priority when it comes to budgetary decisions.

This meeting was viewed as an important first step that will lead to future dialogue and hopefully specific action to improve the lives of some of the most vulnerable Vermonters and their families that are greatly in need of support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Documentary Film on Prescription Drug Abuse Premiers at Flynn Sept 27

Posted: September 5th, 2013 by David Rettew

The Gala Premier of Kingdom County Productions’ new documentary film The Hungry Heart will take place at the Flynn Theater in Burlington, VT on Friday September 27 at 7pm.  The film, directed and produced Kingdom County Prod 2by Bess O’Brien, explores prescription drug addiction through the intimate world of Vermont Pediatrician Fred Holmes who works with patients struggling with this disease. The film provides an intimate look at the often hidden world of addiction and recovery and reveals the many challenges that Dr. Holmes and his patients face in confronting a relentless and difficult disease.  The film shines a light on the healing power of conversation and the need for connection that many of these young addicts yearn for but do not have in their lives.

In addition, the film interviews a number of older addicts who talk about their recovery process juxtaposed against Fred’s patients. The road to recovery is paved with both success stories and strewn with relapses, downfalls and tragic losses. However, through the movie we see the many faces and diverse populations of addiction, and their continued search for a life of Kingdom County Prod 1recovery.

Tickets cost $15 and $30 and can be purchased online, at the Flynn Theater, or by calling 802-863-5966.  Ticket revenue will benefit the local Burlington Turning Point and KCP’s tour expenses.  From Burlington, the film will tour in over 30 locations in Vermont.  More information can be found at www.kingdomcounty.org.

Autism Linked to Maternal Antibodies Reacting to Specific Antigens

Posted: September 3rd, 2013 by David Rettew

While there is quite strong support to view autism as a neurodevelopmental disorder, the precise mechanisms that underlie this spectrum remain elusive.  A research group from the University of California at Davis previously found evidence for autism specific antibodies that were able to recognize fetal proteins.  They now turn to the specific targets or antigens for these antibodies that may be present in the developing brain.Autism antibodies

Subjects for this study came from the Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment study (CHARGE).  A total of 246 children with an autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) were compared to 149 typically developing controls. Maternal blood samples were taken and used to react with fetal rhesus macaque brain tissue.  The authors employed a proteomic antigen identification procedure using tandem mass spectrometry with confirmatory results from western blot analysis.

Results revealed a significantly increased risk of offspring autism related to maternal reactivity to any of implicated antigens either alone or in combination. Reactivity to two or more of the target proteins was found in 23% of mothers of autistic children versus only 1% of non-autistic children. The researchers found 7 primary antigen targets for the maternal antibodies, namely lactate dehydrogenase A and B (LDH), cypin, stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1), collapsin response mediator proteins 1 and 2 (CRMP1, CRMP2), and Y-box-binding protein.  The particular antigens are known to be important in neuronal development and cell migration. There was some evidence that maternal reactivity to these antigens was particularly related to stereotypical behaviors.

The authors concluded that these particular antigens may be the targets of maternal antibodies that lead to abnormal neurodevelopment during gestation.   Reactivity to these fetal proteins, they speculated, could be a potential biomarker for autism.

This study adds to the growing evidence suggesting that the mechanism behind at least some cases of autistic spectrum disorders relates to maternal immune dysregulation that results in disruption of neuronal development and migration in the fetal brain. It is worth noting, however, that maternal antibody reactivity was not found in the majority of ASD cases.

Reference

Braunschweig D, et al. (2013). Autism-specific maternal autoantibodies recognize critical proteins in developing brain.  Trans Psychiatry 3:e277.

 

Sibling Conflict Not Just Kid Stuff

Posted: August 26th, 2013 by David Rettew

Brother and sisters fighting with each other is exceedingly common, but these behaviors often get chalked up to typical sibling interactions, or even a rite of passage that can toughen kids up.  A new study from the journal Pediatrics, however, finds evidence that there may be real mental health consequences to these intense conflicts.Sibling Aggression

The data come the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence.  In this national probability sample, over 3500 children and adolescents participated in a telephone interview from phone numbers selected randomly.  Items from the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire were used to examine three types of aggression occurring in the previous year: psychological (feeling bad or scared due to a sibling’s verbal attacks), property (forcibly taking or destroying something), and physical aggression.  Mental health symptoms were assessed using the Trauma Symptom Checklist.  Analyses of covariance were used to examine mental health scores between children who did and did not experience different types of sibling aggression, controlling for some demographic variables and victimization from other sources.

While not explicitly reported, it appears that 40% of children and adolescents experienced sibling aggression of some form.  Furthermore, those who did were found to have higher mental health distress than those who did not report such sibling conflict.  The effect of “mild” physical aggression (i.e. did not involve a weapon or lead to injury) seemed to be particularly difficult for younger children less than 10 years old.  Cumulative effects were found for those experiencing greater amounts of sibling aggression and those who experienced both peer and sibling aggression.

The authors summarize that there are observable negative effects on children from sibling aggression that should not be dismissed as typical and harmless behavior.  They advocated that current anti-bullying campaigns should consider explicitly including sibling aggression as a target.

This study is a wake-up call to clinicians, warning us not to dismiss sibling aggression as a benign part of growing up.  For clinicians, assessment and treatment of aggressive siblings could likely have positive effects on many family members.  The study would have been strengthened, however, with more anchor points regarding the prevalence of sibling aggression and effect sizes of these behaviors. One aspect that was not accounted for, as is quite common in studies like this, was genetic effects.  It may be that shared genes contribute both to a child’s mental health problems and his or her sibling’s aggression.  Finally, what do we make of the rate of 40% of child and adolescent subjects reporting some sort of sibling aggression in the past year?  This rate seems fairly low and casts some doubt for me on how questions were asked.  Eliminating all sibling conflict seems to be a tall order in my view, and more information on what things can really lead to feelings of fear and intimidation would be useful.

Reference

Tucker CJ, et al.  Association of sibling aggression with child and adolescent mental health.  Pediatrics 2013; 132:79-84.

Early Puberty Plus Temperament Linked to Adolescent Anxiety and Depression

Posted: August 5th, 2013 by David Rettew

The onset of puberty has been occurring earlier for unclear reasons.  Furthermore, a relatively early puberty onset has been associated with internalizing symptoms such as anxiety and depression, especially for girls.  A new study from the journal Development and Psychopathology tests the idea that the effect of this phenomenon may depend on individual attributes such as one’s temperament.Puberty timing

Subjects included 1,025 individuals from the age 11 to 15 who were followed longitudinally for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD).  Temperament was measured using items from various scales, internalizing problems was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist, while puberty timing was assessed by physical exam.  The study focused on temperament dimensions related to emotional reactivity and self-regulation. Structural equation modeling was used to predict age 15 internalizing scores from temperament, puberty timing and their interaction.

Results showed that, for girls, early onset of puberty, higher emotional reactivity, and lower self-regulation predicted internalizing symptoms at age 15.  The relation between puberty timing and internalizing problems was found be a function of temperament with the effect of early puberty strongest among subjects with lower self-regulation.  Controlling for baseline internalizing scores, however, resulted in nonsignificant associations between internalizing problems and both puberty timing and emotional reactivity. For boys, emotional reactivity and low self-regulation was again found to predict internalizing symptoms but no effect of puberty timing was found.

The authors concluded that, for girls only, early puberty is associated with increased internalizing problems, especially for those with specific temperamental vulnerabilities.  This link appears to be due to the association of puberty timing with internalizing problems at age 11 rather than later in adolescence (since controlling for age 11 internalizing problems eliminated the effect of early puberty). 

While the headline of the study was related to the effect of puberty, what stands out for both boys and girls was the association between  later psychopathology and temperament. Like many studies that examine the relations between temperament and psychiatric symptoms, however, it is important to remember that the items used to measure both constructs are often quite similar.

With apologies for the shameless plug, I invite those interested in learning more about the connection between temperament and psychiatric symptoms to check out my new book on the subject to be released next month.

Reference

Crockett LJ, et al.   The role of pubertal timing and temperametal vulnerability in adolescents’ internalizing problems.  Development and Psychopathology 2013; 25(2):377-389.

 

Contact Us ©2010 The University of Vermont – Burlington, VT 05405 – (802) 656-3131
Skip to toolbar