Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘C. S. Peirce’

Emotional practices, part 2: Affective construction, the triune self, & the art of joyful deliberation

Posted in SpiritMatter, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 25, 2020 | Leave a Comment »

In part 1 of this article, I compared two recent books, each of which proclaims a “new paradigm” in the scientific study of emotions and affect: Lisa Feldman Barrett’s “constructivist” How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain and Stephen Asma’s and Rami Gabriel’s “basic emotions”-rooted The Emotional Mind: The Affective Roots of Culture and Cognition. In […]

Read Full Post »

Eco-ethico-aesthetics and George Floyd

Posted in GeoPhilosophy, Politics, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 4, 2020 | Leave a Comment »

As I explain in Shadowing the Anthropocene, process-relational philosophy in a Peircian-Whiteheadian vein takes aesthetics to be first, ethics to be second, and logic (which, in our time, we need to think of also as eco-logic) to be third. This is not a temporal sequence, but a logical one: aesthetics is found in the response […]

Read Full Post »

Long-term civilizational prognosis: a hypothesis

Posted in SpiritMatter, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 14, 2019 | 3 Comments »

Here’s a hypothesis: If the human community exists in some more or less unified form in 880 years (in the year 3000 by our calendar), that feat will have been accomplished, at least in part, in and through the emergence of an ecological religion. What does this mean, and how could we test it? Religion, […]

Read Full Post »

Sobering up…

Posted in AnthropoScene, GeoPhilosophy, tagged , , , , , , , , , on August 22, 2019 | 4 Comments »

Peter Brannen’s Atlantic article “The Anthropocene is a Joke” provides a helpful cold shower for those who’ve gotten a little too drunk on the concept of the Anthropocene. The entire article is worth reading. Here are a few snippets:

Read Full Post »

The second ontological twist

Posted in GeoPhilosophy, tagged , , , , , , , , , , on July 10, 2019 | Leave a Comment »

I keep trying to rephrase the second piece of the “double insight” — or two ontological “twists” — around which the philosophical argument of Shadowing the Anthropocene (and Ecologies of the Moving Image) is woven. The first insight is the process-relational one, which is at the core of both A. N. Whitehead’s metaphysics and many variations […]

Read Full Post »

Updated process-relational theory primer

Posted in GeoPhilosophy, tagged , , , , on June 2, 2019 | Leave a Comment »

I originally presented a “primer” to process-relational philosophy on this blog back in 2010. A substantially updated version of it is part of my book, Shadowing the Anthropocene. Here it is as a stand-alone, 10-page PDF file.

Read Full Post »

Shadowing unshadowed

Posted in GeoPhilosophy, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 1, 2019 | 1 Comment »

As agreed to with my publisher (Punctum), the e-book version of Shadowing the Anthropocene: Eco-Realism for Turbulent Times is now available for free download (or pay what you can). To celebrate this, I’m sharing a couple of snippets from the book here. As related in my Reader’s Guide, the book consists of three sections: first, […]

Read Full Post »

Koinocene (or Cœnocene)?

Posted in AnthropoScene, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , on November 7, 2018 | 2 Comments »

Peircian thinker Gary Fuhrman has posted an interesting piece on the naming of the Anthropocene, entitled Holocenoscopy. Noting that the word Holocene means nothing more than “entirely recent,” as opposed to the Pleistocene, which means “most recent,” so there’s really nowhere left to go with naming geological periods after their recentness, Fuhrman suggests we look to another […]

Read Full Post »

Skip to toolbar