After Nature, the new blog hosted by process-relational ecophilosophical fellow traveler Leon Niemoczynski, now has an RSS feed. That means that I can enthusiastically recommend that philosophically inclined readers of this blog subscribe to it. Leon is author of Charles Sanders Peirce and a Religious Metaphysics of Nature. The five most popular tags on his […]
Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category
After Nature
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought on June 22, 2011 | Comments Off on After Nature
CSG set free (sort of): 10th birthday reflections
Posted in Philosophy, Spirit matter, tagged books, Claiming Sacred Ground, Ivakhiv on June 19, 2011 | 1 Comment »
It seems that my first book, Claiming Sacred Ground, which came out ten years ago, is circulating for free online as a PDF. (I just downloaded it myself to see if it’s the real thing; it is. Do a PDF search for it if you want it.) I don’t mind people downloading it — it’s […]
On noospheres and noesis
Posted in Philosophy, tagged Integral Ecology, noesis, noosphere on June 18, 2011 | 8 Comments »
Tim Morton makes the useful point that E/Z’s notion of the “noosphere” can only be functional if it discriminates between some kinds of thing such as cognizing with neurons versus other kinds of thing such as cognizing with plant hormones, or resting on a table, or spanning a river.
Those objects in the rearview mirror…
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged integral theory, object-oriented philosophy, Whitehead on June 17, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Differences are starting to emerge in our group reading of Integral Ecology, with Tim Morton taking a grumpy stance from the back of the car while others are measured but generally more positive in their assessments. Tim’s main criticism seems to be the Object-Oriented Ontological one that E/Z’s categories “map perfectly onto normal everyday human […]
Integral Ecology – week 3 (part 2)
Posted in Philosophy, tagged Integral Ecology, integral theory, Wilber on June 16, 2011 | 7 Comments »
This continues from the previous post, where I discussed chapter 3 of Integral Ecology. Together these posts make up my summary overviews for Week 3 of the reading group. What follows is less a summary than a response to chapter 4, but I think it covers most of the key concepts in the chapter. […]
Integral Ecology – week 3 (part 1)
Posted in Eco-theory, Philosophy, tagged ecological politics, ecotheory, Esbjorn-Hargens & Zimmerman, Integral Ecology, integral theory, Wilber on June 16, 2011 | 2 Comments »
The Integral Ecology reading group moves here this week, picking up the baton from Adam and Sam at Knowledge Ecology. (And see Michael’s summary at Archive Fire.) This week we’re focusing on chapters 3 (“A Developing Kosmos”) and 4 (“Developing Interiors”). Following a short summative preamble, this post examines Chapter 3. Its follow-up will examine […]
Tim Ingold & the liveliness of the living
Posted in Philosophy, tagged anthropology, books, ecology, environment, Ingold, life, Ontology, epistemology on June 14, 2011 | 6 Comments »
A new book by Tim Ingold is always good news, especially one that — like his 2000 collection Perception of the Environment — brings together several years’ worth of work into one volume. Ingold describes Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description as “in many ways” a “sequel” to that earlier book, and it’s […]
Integral Ecology schedule
Posted in Eco-culture, Philosophy, tagged Integral Ecology, integral theory on May 31, 2011 | 7 Comments »
The Integral Ecology reading group schedule has been announced, with Michael at Archive Fire leading the charge (with the announcement; Adam at Knowledge Ecology with the actual hosting). The schedule is as follows:
What a bodymind can do – Part 3
Posted in Philosophy, Spirit matter, tagged aesthetics, Buddhism, ecology, emergence, ethics, flow, logic, Peirce, Shinzen Young, Whitehead, Wilber on May 30, 2011 | 1 Comment »
This is the concluding part of a three-part article. Part 1 can be found here, Part 2 here. They should be read in the sequence in which they were published. The True, the Good, and the Beautiful All of this can be related to the triad of the True, the Good, and the Beautiful […]
What a bodymind can do – Part 2
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, Spirit matter, tagged Buddhism, meditation, mindfulness, Peirce, practice, Shinzen Young, Whitehead on May 30, 2011 | 1 Comment »
This continues from the previous post, where Shinzen Young’s model of core mindfulness practices was expanded into a system of classifying what a human bodymind can do. Here the model is deepened following the process-relational insights that are at the core of Shinzen’s system as well as of other (especially Mahayana and Vajrayana) Buddhist systems, […]
What a bodymind can do – Part 1
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, Spirit matter, tagged Buddhism, meditation, mindfulness, Peirce, practice, Shinzen Young, Whitehead on May 30, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Working with Shinzen Young‘s system of mindfulness training, which I’ve described here before, and thinking it through in the process-relational logic I’ve been developing on this blog (and elsewhere), is resulting in a certain re-mix of Shinzen’s ideas, and of Buddhism more generally, with Peirce’s, Whitehead’s, Wilber’s, Deleuze’s, and others’. Here’s a crack at where […]
The beatnik brotherhood
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Continental philosophy, Deleuze, Harman, Latour, Stengers, Whitehead on May 25, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Graham Harman’s note reiterating his position that Whitehead, Latour, Deleuze, Bergson, and Simondon (among others) do not make up a coherent philosophical “lump” — “pack” or “tribe” might be more colorful terms here (if philosophers were cats, how herdable would they be?) — makes me want to clarify my own position on these thinkers.