I shared my previous post on the Peirce-L discussion forum and received about 16 responses in five days. The following is an edited version of the summary response I sent to the forum regarding the main comments presented there. I’ve eliminated names or substituted them with single initials where that seemed warranted.
Posts Tagged ‘EMI’
Follow-up on Peirce & the MER/EMR triad
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged categories, EMI, Peirce on February 13, 2016 | 9 Comments »
Rethinking the 3 categories
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged categories, ecocriticism, EMI, film-philosophy, Guattari, Peirce, three ecologies, triadism, Whitehead on February 9, 2016 | 4 Comments »
I’ve been struggling with how my triadic framework for interpreting art works relates to C. S. Peirce’s categories. When I first developed my triadism (fleshed out in Ecologies of the Moving Image) into the non-Peircian terms of materiality, experience, and representation — which I did in the context of teaching a course on the environmental arts — […]
EMI’s cinematic materialism (a response to reviews)
Posted in Cinema, Process-relational thought, tagged cinema studies, ecocdriticism, Ecologies of the Moving Image, EMI, film-philosophy on December 29, 2014 | Leave a Comment »
The latest issue of the open-access Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, an issue devoted to “Gilles Deleuze and Moving Images,” includes a review by Niall Flynn of my book Ecologies of the Moving Image. Another recent review of EMI can be found in the The Journal of Ecocriticism. And I’ve mentioned the Environmental Humanities […]