Peircian thinker Gary Fuhrman has posted an interesting piece on the naming of the Anthropocene, entitled Holocenoscopy. Noting that the word Holocene means nothing more than “entirely recent,” as opposed to the Pleistocene, which means “most recent,” so there’s really nowhere left to go with naming geological periods after their recentness, Fuhrman suggests we look to another […]
Posts Tagged ‘commons’
Koinocene (or Cœnocene)?
Posted in Anthropocene, tagged Anthropocene, C. S. Peirce, categories, Christianithy, commons, Cœnocene, geological designations, geology, Holocene, kainos, koinocene, koinos, Peirce, Pleistocene on November 7, 2018 | 2 Comments »
Belief in expired wor(l)ds, & in wor(l)ds to come…
Posted in Philosophy, Politics, tagged capitalism, commons, Communism, Deleuze, Hardt & Negri on March 14, 2011 | 12 Comments »
It riles me up when intelligent people whose work I respect a lot say ill-considered, if not outright indefensible, things. Jodi Dean’s post arguing that communism “worked” strikes me as such a thing. I’ve provided a lengthy counter-argument on her blog, the gist of which is that the political projects that were actually carried out […]
Ostrom’s Nobel, the commons, & blog flow
Posted in Eco-culture, Politics, tagged commons, economics, Hardt & Negri, Ostrom, resource management on October 15, 2009 | 2 Comments »
Several days of silence calls for at least a whimper of sound here… I’ve been on the road (Washington, DC, Boston, and tomorrow Montreal) and writing for crisp deadlines in amidst the travel. And I’m still uncertain as to whether it’s better to post little snippets just to keep the flow coming to your blog […]