Keith Robinson’s introduction to the collection Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson: Rhizomatic Connections, just published by Palgrave Macmillan, provides an excellent and much needed overview of the reception histories of these three thinkers. Robinson’s contextualization of them within the analytical and continental philosophical traditions makes clear why each has been marginalized or misunderstood to varying degrees in […]
Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category
Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged analytical philosophy, Bergson, complexity, Continental philosophy, Deleuze, Whitehead on April 12, 2009 | 6 Comments »
‘After 1968’ & the blessedness of the Buddho-Spinozan
Posted in Philosophy, Politics, Spirit matter, tagged affect, Agamben, Buddhism, Deleuze, Dzogchen, Madhyamika, mindfulness, political theory, post-marxism, poststructuralism, Spinoza on April 11, 2009 | 2 Comments »
There’s a wealth of material in post-marxist and poststructuralist political philosophy to be found at the After 1968 web site, which documents a series of seminars and lectures held in Maastricht over the last few years. You can find texts by Agamben, Deleuze, Badiou, Ranciere, Baudrillard, Negri, Derrida, Nancy, and others there, though it will […]
kvond’s Spinoza
Posted in Philosophy, tagged panpsychism, Spinoza on April 11, 2009 | 2 Comments »
I’ve been perusing Kvond’s wonderful Spinozist blog Frames /Sing, which synthesizes in-depth readings of Spinoza alongside a broad interest in ontology, biology, semiosis (including biosemiotics), Deleuze, Latour, Heidegger, and much else, and generates insightful discussion with a coterie of other bloggers. For anyone interested, here’s a short list of some possibly entry points into his […]
from Lacan to soil, neurophysiology, & happiness
Posted in Philosophy, tagged ecotheory, Guattari, Lacan, neuropolitics on April 5, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
I’ve been impressed and even moved by a few recent posts over at Larval Subjects. “Electro-Chemical Signifiers” describes the author’s transformation from full-fledged Lacanian (both theorist and analyst) to something that seems much broader and welcoming of the world. Not, of course, that Lacanians cannot be broad and welcoming of the world; I’m only judging […]
finds
Posted in Philosophy, tagged Buddhism on March 22, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Warwick philosophy journal Pli has made some back issues available on-line, including issues on Romanticism, Science, Nature, and Nietzsche. A few particularly recommended articles: Isabelle Stengers, “God’s Heart and the Stuff of Life“, John Sellars, “The point of view of the cosmos: Deleuze, Romanticism, Stoicism,” Alain Badiou, “Who is Nietzsche?,” and the Nomadic Trajectories issue, […]
the other biocultural studies
Posted in Philosophy, tagged bioculturalism on March 13, 2009 | 2 Comments »
Following from the last entry: I should have mentioned the other kind of biocultural studies that’s been getting more & more attention recently: see here, here, and here. The “Biocultures Manifesto,” which appeared in New Literary History back in 2007, seemed to suggest that it was time for all the work on embodiment, biopolitics (Foucauldian, […]
philosophical sitings
Posted in Media ecology, Philosophy on March 9, 2009 | 2 Comments »
I really think that philosophy’s production site is shifting more and more from the library/study and cafe and scholarly journal to the web and blogosphere. Kvond over at Frames /sing has been putting out some very interesting and detailed blogs about Bruno Latour. Larvalsubjects (philosopher and ex-Lacanian analyst Levi Bryant) is blogging about ontology, assemblages, […]
Immanent naturalism
Posted in Eco-culture, Philosophy, tagged Connolly, immanent naturalism on February 26, 2009 | 7 Comments »
“Immanent naturalism” is political theorist William E. Connolly’s term for a tradition of thought that doesn’t seek ultimate explanations, ahistorical forces, or transcendental frameworks to give meaning to the world; rather, it finds meaning enough in the world as it is experienced by mortals like us. The general idea is that the world itself is […]
Kauffman, Shaviro, Goodwin, et al.
Posted in Philosophy, Science & society, Spirit matter, tagged biology, complexity, emergence, immanence on February 23, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Complexity theorist Stuart Kaufmann recently gave a talk here from his book Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion, which is getting more press these days than most books with a Spinozian/Whiteheadian take on the emergent nature of intelligence, complexity, spirituality, and all that. Talking to him afterwards, I was a […]
immanence & codependent origination
Posted in Philosophy, Spirit matter, tagged Buddhism, immanence, psychoanalysis, theory on February 14, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
I took a break from reading John Mullarkey’s Post-Continental Philosophy: An Outline – in which Mullarkey develops a philosophy of immanence drawing on, and critiquing, the respective efforts of Gilles Deleuze, Alain Badiou, Michel Henry, and Francois Laruelle – to have some lunch and browse the latest issue of Tricycle. One of the articles, a […]
imagination & contemporary theory
Posted in Philosophy, Spirit matter, tagged affect, cognition, Continental philosophy, Deleuze, enchantment, imagination, Jung, theory, visuality on February 11, 2009 | 1 Comment »
This is a summary I provided to a grad student who was starting to get into this area. It’s very introductory and far from complete in its coverage, but since there’s so little out there on this topic, I thought it would be useful to post it. It’s also a bit biased towards literature that’s […]