Hope's Centre-Table

It’s always fun to twine together threads about the future of reading.The introduction of Kindle has occurred at about the same time as the announcement of yet another study on the reading habits, or lack thereof, of US citizens. So, for fun, compare:
1) The Right to Read, by Richard Stallman
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
“For Dan Halbert, the road to Tycho began in college—when Lissa Lenz asked to borrow his computer. Hers had broken down, and unless she could borrow another, she would fail her midterm project. There was no one she dared ask, except Dan.
This put Dan in a dilemma. He had to help her—but if he lent her his computer, she might read his books. Aside from the fact that you could go to prison for many years for letting someone else read your books, the very idea shocked him at first. Like everyone, he had been taught since elementary school that sharing books was nasty and wrong—something that only pirates would do.”
2) The Future of Reading: A play in Six Acts
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/11/19/the-future-of-reading
3) Unboxing Amazon’s Kindle, By Peter Glaskowsky
http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9822443-2.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Webware
4) Google on “nea reading 2007” for links to and about the NEA study on reading rates. For example, a NY Times article by Motoko Rich, Nov. 19, 2007, starts:
“…Americans — particularly young Americans — appear to be reading less for fun, and as that happens, their reading test scores are declining. At the same time, performance in other academic disciplines like math and science is dipping for students whose access to books is limited, and employers are rating workers deficient in basic writing skills.”

A new group (on Yahoo, which at this time seems a bit quaint) has been added to the pantheon of places to discuss digitization and e-texts. The specific topic of this group, according to its creator Jon Noring, is “for serious, in-depth discussion and information exchange, technical and non-technical, of the digitization of “paper” publications, such as books, periodicals, etc. The focus is heavily on public domain texts (the co-founders’ general interest), but not limited to that.” The group’s home page is at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital-text/
As people are introducing themselves, I thought I’d capture some of the URLs being posted…they may provide some interesting leads.
(In no particular order)
1) http://www.exegenix.com – a company that converts legacy (proprietary) content to XML
2) Three projects from Concordia Theological Seminary
http://www.projectwittenberg.org/ – electronic Luther and Lutheriana
http://www.ctsfw.edu/library/probono.php – Walther Library: pro bono ecclesiae: Theological Resources, and
http://replica.palni.edu/cdm4/browse.php?CISOROOT=%2Fcopcampus – Saarinem’s Village: Images of the Concordia Campus (hosted by PALNI – Private Academic Library Network of Indiana’s ContentDM server)
3) http://www.sclqld.org.au/schp/digitisation.php – Supreme Court of Queensland Library digitization project (digitizing letterpress books from 1874)
4) http://www.ecmi.de/emap – European Centre for Minority Issues Ethnopolitical Map
5) http://www.datastandards.co.uk/index.htm – a company that provides document conversion, typesetting and print on demand services.
6) http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/index.php?page_id=Home – University of Virginia Press ROTUNDA “publication of original digital scholarship along with newly digitized critical and documentary editions in the humanities and social sciences. ” David Sewell’s group which, of course, uses the TEI!
7) http://spenserarchive.org/ – The Spencer Archive
So, so far, only one self-identified TEI using site, and several commercial service sites. No doubt there willbe more to come…

Day 3 began with a wonderful talk by Melissa Terras (UC London) on the need for better TEI education. She also introduced the TEI by Example project, which is working on, to quote the website,

• the creation and on-line delivery of a TEI by example course for teaching TEI in higher education and workshops
• the creation and on-line delivery of a software toolkit for teaching text encoding
• the documentation of the methodology, workflow and findings of the project in a project report

The morning session that I attended continued this theme. First Lou Burnard and Sebastian Rahtz presented a summaryof the work done at the AHRC Methods Network course “Workshop on Development of Skills in Advanced Text Encoding with TEI P5“, held at Oxford University Computing Services, September 18th-20th 2006. Over the three days of the course the group tried (and largely succeeded) in coming up with models for one-day and mulit-day courses on the TEI for various constituencies. The learning objectives, plans, resources, etc, are all available on the wiki, linked above.
Werner Wegstein then discussed teaching the TEI to MA programme students in philology and also raised issues about best approaches, essentially finding ways to get students interested in the possibilities for their scholarship. If they see the use, if they have a need, they will learn. (This started me thinking about our own CS department’s recent move to offer a BA. There should be some way to make connections, perhaps with faulty who are looking for student project ideas…)
Next, Dot Porter described the Aelfric project which has a distributed group of encoders, many novices. Dot showed the materials and guidelines that they have put together to help the encoders.
The questions still remain: what’s a good approach to teaching the TEI/ who should the audience(s) be? what are ways to leverage or modularize teaching resources or methods? But at least the questions are on the table.
Daniel O’Donnell mentioned that he had convinced someone to use the TEI only after he showed them an example of something that could not be done by HTML alone. Perhaps this is another route the TEI by Example’ movement can take: instead of just writing and describing encoding practice, showing this kind of process or result may provide a more effective “hook.”
But that can be discussed tomorrow…Day 4; SIGs, specifically, for me, the meeting on education.
Meanwhile, the afternoon contained a thorough introduction to the new “P5” version of the TEI and the day wrapped up with a panel discussing funding opportunities. Representatives from several funding agencies, including Christopher Mackie (Andrew W. Mellon Foundation), Brett Bobley (NEH), Joyce Ray (IMLS), Ron Musto and Eileen Gardiner (ACLS), and Max Vögler (DFG) provided descriptions of their programs. A lively discussion ensued about ways humanities applicants could be encouraged to either use the TEI or at least indicate why they are not using it. Collaboration and sustainability were the main themes. Chris Mackie of AWMF provided a humorous description of how not to write a proposal. (“We have some content, at least one scholar is interested, we want to put it on the web, we like wikis and blogs, we’d like to maybe later do open publishing, but we haven’t actually talked to anyone else in the field, we haven’t looked to related disciplines or our instituton, or read the literature to see what anyone else is doing, we’d like a whole lot of $$, we want to do it our way, and everyone else should adopt ours once it is built…”)

Day 2 began, after introductions and welcomes, with the opening plenary session by B. Tommie Usdin (Mulberry Technologies) and chair of Balisage (aka the annual Extreme Markup conference). After praising the work of the TEI, Tommie had some pointed and, I believe, very timely comments on the need for the TEI to grow through better communication. Most especially what is needed is entry-level training for potential and new users. (Hoorah!!)
Up next were two panel sessions, one on manuscript encoding, the other showcasing three different text collection projects. I attended the latter (though it was hard to pass on the session about the Paston letters). The collections are:

• The Digital Scriptorium, specifically Notre Dame’s participation in this Columbia University-hosted project that brings together seven institutional partners’ medieval manuscript collections (Ben Panciera and Rob Fox)
• the large-scale production of texts at the University of Michigan for inclusion in the Text Creation Partnership’s Early English Texts Online (Paul Schaffner) (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_Creation_Partnership and documentation: http://www.lib.umich.edu/tcp/docs/
• the University of Virginia Press ROTUNDA imprint (David Sewell)

What I found most interesting about these collections, aside from their content of course, was that they are all using the TEI but in different ways, some extended, some with MEP. Also, they use quite a variety of tools to create, validate, index, and deliver the texts including JEdit, Oxygen, Lucene, MarkLogic, LAMP, perl, ImageMagick, Graphic Convertor, Saxon-SA, and SRU.
Despite the fact that the second panel of the day included a session on History and GIS as well as music encoding, I ended up at the “Markup as Theory” panel instead. The issues raised were varied and interesting. My own reaction was one of questions: Does marking up a text provide discoveries about the text, impose constraints on the text, encourage more personal exploration of a text, or even allow for ways to express a text as not a text, (i.e. as more than a text, see FRBR: a text is not a text, it is a work, expression, manifestation, item). The answer was yes. That is, being deliberative in thinking about one’s markup is necessary and fascinating.
The day was to end with a combination poster sessions/reception but first came a wonderful idea: there were 21 posters and in order to give the poster presenters an opportunity to “advertise” their posters, we had a poster slam. Each poster presenter had exactly one minute to describe, encourage, cajole or otherwise promote their poster. The timekeeper was strict and the chime ringer (using the original, antique NBC chimes now housed at UMD) rang each presenter off at mid-sentence if necessary. Lots of fun, and an idea that I think we can use in future. (We may have to find a Vermont equivalent to the NBC chimes–perhaps a cow bell?) The posters were fascinating. As they are not available at the web site, but are available on paper, I’ll scan and post them when I get back to a scanner.

“Wanted: film production assistant with sufficient power to ward off attacking monsters. Must be able to resist shooting fireballs at your mortal enemy while we are on location.”
An amusing Washington Post article discusses the challenges of creating a movie using an online environment for your set. These filmmakers are creating ‘machinima,’ or movies that draw from, or are set in, online virtual worlds like World of Warcraft. They have discovered that, in some cases, they have even less control over their set than they would have filming in the ‘real world.’
The project, the joys, the challenges,and the surprises: full article by Mike Musgrove:
“Shooting a Movie in a Fantasy World…”