Graham Harman’s reply to my critical response to his book Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political, which appeared as part of a book symposium in Global Discourse earlier this year, is readable online, here. I won’t address the details of that reply here. Some of them relate to our divergent interpretations of Latour, and since Harman has now written two books (and more) about […]
Posts Tagged ‘object-oriented philosophy’
Harman’s reply
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Harman, Latour, object-oriented philosophy, speculative realism on June 9, 2015 | 24 Comments »
Ingold’s (hi)stories from the north
Posted in Philosophy, tagged anthropology, cosmology, history, indigenous peoples, Ingold, object-oriented philosophy, the North, Under Western Skies on September 11, 2014 | Leave a Comment »
The keynote talks at this conference (including my own) are being videotaped and will be made available publicly sometime in the coming months, as I understand it, so I haven’t made any effort to document them here. But with Tim Ingold I couldn’t resist. Anthropologist Ingold has been a prominent star in my intellectual sky […]
“Beatnik Brothers” in Parrhesia
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Deleuze, Graham Harman, Nonhuman Turn, object-oriented philosophy, process philosophy, speculative realism, Whitehead on June 21, 2014 | 4 Comments »
The new issue of Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy includes work by Quentin Meillassoux, Tristan Garcia, a review panel discussing Katrin Pahl’s Tropes of Transport: Hegel and Emotion, and a piece by me on the objects-processes debate in speculative realist philosophy. The latter, entitled “Beatnik Brothers? Between Graham Harman and the Deleuzo-Whiteheadian Axis,” is an updated version […]
Lava lampy Whitehead?
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Bogost, lava lampy materialism, Morton, object-oriented philosophy, Whitehead on November 30, 2013 | 1 Comment »
While I find much to admire in Tim Morton’s writings (and in him personally, as I’ve recently related), I’m sure he knows that his writing on what he calls “lava lampy materialism” leaves me unconvinced. (I’ve discussed that topic here, here, and elsewhere.) I haven’t read his Realist Magic yet, so I can’t comment on […]
NT7: Beatnik brothers…
Posted in Philosophy, tagged Harman, Nonhuman Turn, object-oriented philosophy on May 4, 2012 | 1 Comment »
For what it’s worth, here’s the Power Point that went along with my talk. I changed the title to “Beatnik Brothers? Harman’s Objects and the Becoming-Whiteheadian of Deleuze.” I meant “of Deleuzians” (some of whom were in the audience: Manning, Shaviro, Massumi and Hansen I think). The first two slides are the original title (slide) […]
Whitehead’s return, ecology’s boon
Posted in Eco-theory, Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged environmental philosophy, object-oriented philosophy, process philosophy, speculative realism, Whitehead on April 29, 2012 | 12 Comments »
“Ultimately, the thinking of speculative pragmatism that is activist philosophy belongs to nature. Its aesthetico-politics compose a nature philosophy. The occurrent arts in which it exhibits itself are politics of nature. “The one-word summary of its relational-qualitative goings on: ecology. Activist philosophy concerns the ecology of powers of existence. Becomings in the midst. Creative change […]
Process-objects at The Nonhuman Turn
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Nonhuman Turn, object-oriented philosophy, speculative realism on February 28, 2012 | 10 Comments »
The preliminary schedule is out for The Nonhuman Turn in 21st Century Studies. The list of speakers reads like a “who’s who” of the neo-ontological, speculative-realist crowd in cultural and media theory: Steven Shaviro, Jane Bennett, Brian Massumi, Erin Manning, Mark Hansen, Ian Bogost, and Tim Morton are among the keynotes, while lesser mortals like […]
Morton’s poetry
Posted in Philosophy, tagged aesthetics, object-oriented philosophy, process-, Tim Morton on October 2, 2011 | 19 Comments »
Tim Morton writes beautifully. His “Objects as Temporary Autonomous Zones,” published in the most recent issue of Continent, is a beautiful illustration of this. I could say he writes poetically, but that would be suggesting that his writing is not itself poetry, but only looks and feels like poetry — which would mean succumbing to […]
Democracy of Objects
Posted in Philosophy, tagged Bryant, object-oriented philosophy, speculative realism on September 13, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Levi Bryant’s The Democracy of Objects is finally available and readable on-line, courtesy of a wonderfully innovative relationship between Open Humanities Press and the University of Michigan Library’s Scholarly Publishing Office. The book is part of OHP’s New Metaphysics Series, edited by Graham Harman and Bruno Latour. As regular readers know, Levi has been a […]
Life outside the lava lamp
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged lava lamps, object-oriented philosophy on August 17, 2011 | 17 Comments »
Over at Naught Thought, Ben Woodard (sorry, Ben, for the earlier misspell) wants “to know what the Process/Relational folks think” of his thoughts about philosophies of process versus philosophies of objects or substances (or something like that). What follows is one quick and dirty way of thinking of a certain key difference between these two […]
Those objects in the rearview mirror…
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged integral theory, object-oriented philosophy, Whitehead on June 17, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Differences are starting to emerge in our group reading of Integral Ecology, with Tim Morton taking a grumpy stance from the back of the car while others are measured but generally more positive in their assessments. Tim’s main criticism seems to be the Object-Oriented Ontological one that E/Z’s categories “map perfectly onto normal everyday human […]
The movement of larval objects
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Bryant, object-oriented philosophy on May 24, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Levi Bryant has a wonderful post up in response to my announcement of Stengers’s book. If mine was “less appealing” to him, as he puts it, this may not be a bad thing, as it seems to have elicited a shimmering cascade of resonating strings in his thinking. (Perhaps appeal has a devilishly indirect manner […]