Feeds:
Posts
Comments

things

. . . scribbled on a restaurant napkin:

1. Things are always already in process.

2. More complex things are more in process, or in more (and different) processes, than simpler things.

3. Growing/developing/evolving things tend to become more complex. Other things tend to become less so.

4. Being in process, things elude capture. Those that don’t become other things, and generally simpler things, than they were.

5. You can never do only one thing.

6. You can never isolate one thing from the rest. When you try, that thing ceases to be what it is, or it drags other things with it.

7. Knowing is doing; doing is knowing. But neither of them is only and fully the other.

8. Every moment presents options. Its passing alters the options presented to future moments.

9. Every action feeds a relation, tweaks a process, builds a network.

10. A world full of things made by the human Thing makes it seem that things are merely things, simple things, dead things. Even those things aren’t that, but other things certainly aren’t that.

EA6929-005.jpg

Notes:

(1) “Things” is a generic term for bits and pieces of world/universe. Things do; things are done.

(2) Complexity and simplicity are relative; entropy and negentropy are general trends. In reality, most things don’t just move all in one direction.

(4) Everything becomes different from itself anyway. The question is always what to become.

(5) But you can try.

(7) Form is substance; substance is form. But… same story.

(9) Or many at once.

(10) The “human Thing” includes humans, ruminants and cereal grasses, fossil fuels, cities, techno-economic networks, and an ever diversifying range of things made for the Thing and things made to make other things for the Thing. Things made by the human Thing even seem to be getting livelier and more complex (e.g., digital life, nanotechnology, online worlds). We are building a complex (mega)network atop a complex (mega)network, but with relations between the two (Terra 1.0 and Terra 2.0, if you will) growing more tenuous and fragile.

When I first heard that an Egyptian university placed fourth worldwide in scholarly productivity, and that it was due to the work of a single scholar, I couldn’t help thinking of Graham Harman churning out brilliant philosophical tomes out of American University in Cairo… Turns out this guy beats Graham handily in quantity and — inversely speaking (!) — in quality. A good reason to edit one’s own journal?

See Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings – NYTimes.com

Peaksurfer‘s Albert Bates has a very good article up called The Great Change: Slouching towards Cancun.

A few tidbits:

Because of the huge outpouring of non-profit energy, money and effort at Copenhagen last year, and the subsequent meltdown of the Copenhagen round, the approach to this year’s COP (Conference of Parties to the Framework Climate Convention) has been like a drunk waking up with a really bad hangover. A hot shower and several carafes of coffee later, many are really wondering if we want to go back into the bar again tonight.

There is fresh meat in Cancun, including some inexperienced groups still enamored of the vision of a low carbon future that might be achieved just by signing a few international agreements, eating fewer animals, driving hybrid cars and changing light bulbs.

To the veterans, who are less like drunks and more like near-suicidal PTSD sufferers, a dramatic reduction of energy consumption in a complex society seems quite unlikely, absent some catastrophic event, which in their darker moments some have even begun to hope for. Even Peak Oil is moving too slowly, with shale gas and biofuels propping up near-term supplies. We need a supervolcano.

[. . .]

Political and military power seeks only to continue itself, by any expediency, no matter how short-sighted. Student protests over tuition increases and most labor union agendas fall into this same expediency. Sooner or later, they are all as deer, frozen in the headlight of an approaching freight train. Nothing in their cultural conditioning or centuries of military history has prepared them for this moment. Nature is no machine, and she is angry when revved up.

I recommend the whole article.

I somehow missed that the Ecomedia Studies group (which I was a co-founder of) has launched an eponymous blog. (It used to be a group wiki page, but now has morphed into a public blog.)

It looks very good, and features some of the more prolific young scholars in ecomedia criticism, green media studies, ecocinecriticism, and what have you. It may even give the (now hot, now cold) Indications a run for the money among group blogs in the environmental communication field. I send it good wishes (and hopefully subscribers, too). And might show up there myself from time to time.

briefing

Once this blog migrates to the new site — which should happen as soon as the UVM blogmasters press the right buttons and set the transition into motion — I plan to start a regular (weekly or so) feature directing readers to interesting developments in ecoculture and geophilosophy. (And sometimes “mediapolitics,” where it converges with the other two.) It won’t be a comprehensive report, but more a briefing in the style of Harper’s Findings, with a nod and a wink, and footnotes added. (I love Popdose’s attempts to set those findings to music.)

In that spirit… Over the last little while, Robert Graves and Didier Madoc-Jones sent fourteen postcards from the future in which climate change has already taken place, essentially as geophysicists were warning. Greenland warmed to the idea, setting its own glaciers to break their own speed limits. Chinese Daoists opened a temple atop Mount Yi, adding to the growing rebirth of the philosophical and religious tradition most clearly aimed at keeping those glaciers intact. Nature artists meeting in South Korea continued to craft objects of beauty in blissful ignorance of the conflagration brewing up around them. Bats beat out six other contenders for the title of Animal with the Weirdest Genitalia on Earth. Elsewhere, Sarah Palin was caught fishing too close to bears, the state movie of both Missouri and North Dakota became Jesus Camp, and the state word of Nevada became “debauchery.” Scientists found that dark matter pulls things together and dark energy pushes them apart. Between the pushing and the pulling they expect we’ll be able to catch our breath for a while longer.

(Hat tip to Tim for the postcards.)

inside job

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2DRm5ES-uA?fs=1&hl=en_US

It’s not as good a film as I would have liked — there are too many talking heads, and director/interviewer Charles Ferguson (who remains conveniently invisible throughout) has an annoying tendency to look for “gotcha” moments, when his interview subjects hesitate and stumble in answering his questions, as if these provide the smoking gun that shows us they’re lying, squirming, deceitful cheaters. They probably are (some of them at least), so relying on these techniques isn’t really necessary and it makes too easy targets of them as individuals.

But Inside Job still manages to pack a lot of information into a cogent and easily understandable narrative. It is, in fact, probably the best two-hour summary of what happened to bring about the recent, and ongoing, economic crisis, and of who’s primarily responsible for it. The film points its finger at the deregulator economists and the type-A personalities on Wall Street who took advantage of the opportunities deregulation offered for making millions at the expense of the rest of us dupes, and at the revolving doors between government and capital that have corrupted democracy to the point where it’s bringing about its own downfall. (The first “it” being the corruption, the second being democracy.*)

Continue Reading »

hermaphroditic slugs

This is better than the snail sex scene in Microcosmos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhVi4Z6CjZk?fs=1&hl=en_US

H/t to BBC Earth via Leaf Warbler and Reconciliation EcologyTry here if the above doesn’t work.

One of the tasks of this blog, since its inception in late 2008, has been to articulate a theoretical-philosophical perspective that I have come to call “process-relational.” This is a theoretical paradigm and an ontology that takes the basic nature of the world to be that of relational process: that is, it understands the basic constituents of the world to be events of encounter, acts or moments of experience that are woven together to constitute the processes by which all things occur, unfold, and evolve. Understanding ourselves and our relations with the world around us in this way, it is argued, can help us unwind ourselves from out of a set of dualisms that have ensnared modern thought over the last few centuries. In contrast to materialist, idealist, dualist, and other perspectives that have dominated modern western philosophy, a process-relational perspective more explicitly recognizes the dynamic, complex, systemic, and evolving nature of reality.

What follows is a brief summary of the process-relational perspective. It is followed by some bibliographic starting points and by a list of links to some of the more substantive posts on this blog that have dealt with process-relational theory.

Note: An updated and much more complete version of this primer is found in Appendix 1 of Shadowing the Anthropocene, available for free (or pay-what-you-can) download from the publisher.

Continue Reading »

This may be one of the final posts on the Movable Type version of this blog. Immanence will be migrating soon to WordPress. A new blog design is currently being finalized. The new address (a trial attempt, already noticed by a few followers of this blog, was put up here this past summer). That will be the new address, so if you’d like to make sure you don’t miss any posts, you can go subscribe to it now.

That means that this design, with its “foggy forest” theme, will be “put down,” as they say about four-legged loved ones. This one has served me well, and I appreciate those of you who’ve commented kindly on the appearance of this site. I know it looks very different on different browsers, and some have found it too dark and difficult to read. In testing the new one so far, I’ve found it to be best with Safari, but my hope is that it will work fine on all browsers. (And I expect you to let me know if it doesn’t.)

I’m off to the IAEP (Environmental Philosophy) and SPEP meetings in Montreal soon. But before I go, I will upload one last post of substance, a primer in process-relational theory. Momentarily.

the wheel

Just as I’m teaching the “biomorphism” section of my film course (where we burrow into the interactive liveliness of moving-image objects), Tim Morton at Ecology without Nature shares this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT13GuPZHMA&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3

It all starts from wheeling around. Great stuff.

Now that the election results are in, we can all go back to thinking about what U.S. citizens (and non-citizen residents like me) can do about the sad state of affairs in this country. Gara LaMarche’s and Deepak Bhargava’s recent Nation piece The Road Ahead for Progressives: Back to Basics captures the overall picture quite well, in my opinion.

While LaMarche and Bhargava acknowledge Obama’s tactical errors and mistakes in judgment, they don’t wallow in self-pity, as the left tends to in moments like these. “As for the left,” they write,

Continue Reading »

happy hallowe’en

Pumpkinpic.jpg

As occasionally happens, I was invited to speak last week at a local Unitarian Universalist service (in Stowe, Vermont). Since today/night is Hallowe’en/Samhain and that’s part of what I spoke about, I thought I would share a brief summary of the talk, which was called “Hallowed Ground, Sacred Space, and the Space Between the Worlds.”

Continue Reading »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Skip to toolbar