Feeds:
Posts
Comments

briefing

Once this blog migrates to the new site — which should happen as soon as the UVM blogmasters press the right buttons and set the transition into motion — I plan to start a regular (weekly or so) feature directing readers to interesting developments in ecoculture and geophilosophy. (And sometimes “mediapolitics,” where it converges with the other two.) It won’t be a comprehensive report, but more a briefing in the style of Harper’s Findings, with a nod and a wink, and footnotes added. (I love Popdose’s attempts to set those findings to music.)

In that spirit… Over the last little while, Robert Graves and Didier Madoc-Jones sent fourteen postcards from the future in which climate change has already taken place, essentially as geophysicists were warning. Greenland warmed to the idea, setting its own glaciers to break their own speed limits. Chinese Daoists opened a temple atop Mount Yi, adding to the growing rebirth of the philosophical and religious tradition most clearly aimed at keeping those glaciers intact. Nature artists meeting in South Korea continued to craft objects of beauty in blissful ignorance of the conflagration brewing up around them. Bats beat out six other contenders for the title of Animal with the Weirdest Genitalia on Earth. Elsewhere, Sarah Palin was caught fishing too close to bears, the state movie of both Missouri and North Dakota became Jesus Camp, and the state word of Nevada became “debauchery.” Scientists found that dark matter pulls things together and dark energy pushes them apart. Between the pushing and the pulling they expect we’ll be able to catch our breath for a while longer.

(Hat tip to Tim for the postcards.)

inside job

It’s not as good a film as I would have liked — there are too many talking heads, and director/interviewer Charles Ferguson (who remains conveniently invisible throughout) has an annoying tendency to look for “gotcha” moments, when his interview subjects hesitate and stumble in answering his questions, as if these provide the smoking gun that shows us they’re lying, squirming, deceitful cheaters. They probably are (some of them at least), so relying on these techniques isn’t really necessary and it makes too easy targets of them as individuals.

But Inside Job still manages to pack a lot of information into a cogent and easily understandable narrative. It is, in fact, probably the best two-hour summary of what happened to bring about the recent, and ongoing, economic crisis, and of who’s primarily responsible for it. The film points its finger at the deregulator economists and the type-A personalities on Wall Street who took advantage of the opportunities deregulation offered for making millions at the expense of the rest of us dupes, and at the revolving doors between government and capital that have corrupted democracy to the point where it’s bringing about its own downfall. (The first “it” being the corruption, the second being democracy.*)

Continue Reading »

hermaphroditic slugs

This is better than the snail sex scene in Microcosmos.

H/t to BBC Earth via Leaf Warbler and Reconciliation EcologyTry here if the above doesn’t work.

One of the tasks of this blog, since its inception in late 2008, has been to articulate a theoretical-philosophical perspective that I have come to call “process-relational.” This is a theoretical paradigm and an ontology that takes the basic nature of the world to be that of relational process: that is, it understands the basic constituents of the world to be events of encounter, acts or moments of experience that are woven together to constitute the processes by which all things occur, unfold, and evolve. Understanding ourselves and our relations with the world around us in this way, it is argued, can help us unwind ourselves from out of a set of dualisms that have ensnared modern thought over the last few centuries. In contrast to materialist, idealist, dualist, and other perspectives that have dominated modern western philosophy, a process-relational perspective more explicitly recognizes the dynamic, complex, systemic, and evolving nature of reality.

What follows is a brief summary of the process-relational perspective. It is followed by some bibliographic starting points and by a list of links to some of the more substantive posts on this blog that have dealt with process-relational theory.

Note: An updated and much more complete version of this primer is found in Appendix 1 of Shadowing the Anthropocene, available for free (or pay-what-you-can) download from the publisher.

Continue Reading »

This may be one of the final posts on the Movable Type version of this blog. Immanence will be migrating soon to WordPress. A new blog design is currently being finalized. The new address (a trial attempt, already noticed by a few followers of this blog, was put up here this past summer). That will be the new address, so if you’d like to make sure you don’t miss any posts, you can go subscribe to it now.

That means that this design, with its “foggy forest” theme, will be “put down,” as they say about four-legged loved ones. This one has served me well, and I appreciate those of you who’ve commented kindly on the appearance of this site. I know it looks very different on different browsers, and some have found it too dark and difficult to read. In testing the new one so far, I’ve found it to be best with Safari, but my hope is that it will work fine on all browsers. (And I expect you to let me know if it doesn’t.)

I’m off to the IAEP (Environmental Philosophy) and SPEP meetings in Montreal soon. But before I go, I will upload one last post of substance, a primer in process-relational theory. Momentarily.

the wheel

Just as I’m teaching the “biomorphism” section of my film course (where we burrow into the interactive liveliness of moving-image objects), Tim Morton at Ecology without Nature shares this:

It all starts from wheeling around. Great stuff.

Now that the election results are in, we can all go back to thinking about what U.S. citizens (and non-citizen residents like me) can do about the sad state of affairs in this country. Gara LaMarche’s and Deepak Bhargava’s recent Nation piece The Road Ahead for Progressives: Back to Basics captures the overall picture quite well, in my opinion.

While LaMarche and Bhargava acknowledge Obama’s tactical errors and mistakes in judgment, they don’t wallow in self-pity, as the left tends to in moments like these. “As for the left,” they write,

Continue Reading »

happy hallowe’en

Pumpkinpic.jpg

As occasionally happens, I was invited to speak last week at a local Unitarian Universalist service (in Stowe, Vermont). Since today/night is Hallowe’en/Samhain and that’s part of what I spoke about, I thought I would share a brief summary of the talk, which was called “Hallowed Ground, Sacred Space, and the Space Between the Worlds.”

Continue Reading »

vote

Jodi Dean, whose work I respect a lot, won’t vote in the upcoming U.S. elections. The election, she argues, “won’t do anything but secure a false sense of connectedness from those who do vote to the oligarchy that continues to exploit us.” Mark Lance is agreeing with her that voting is the opiate of the masses, but thinks voting can still be useful.

I can’t vote, since I only live and work here; I’m not a citizen. (There are a few places in the U.S. where I could vote locally, though not federally, but the progressive bastion of Burlington, Vermont, isn’t one of them.) But if I could, I would. Here’s why.

Continue Reading »

world looks back

Kenya_JR_WAH_4214.jpg

French street artist JR (who I blogged about here) has been awarded the TED Prize. Worldchanging shares a number of his images of “the world looking back” here. The New York Times has more on the story. JR’s web site has more photos.

house-of-cards.jpg

For all my skepticism toward most “climate skepticism,” I find the case of Judith Curry very interesting. This recent post at her blog Climate Etc. repeatedly resorts to metaphors like “‘Alice down the rabbit hole’ moments” and “bucket[s] of cold water being poured over my head” to describe her experiences venturing outside the warm world of academic climate science to one that’s exposed to the harsh winds of public and media scrutiny. The post includes an account of her journey from mainstream climate scientist to one who is “sadder and wiser as a result of the hurricane wars [that followed the publication of an article published in the aftermath of Katrina], a public spokesperson on the global warming issue owing to the media attention from the hurricane wars, more broadly knowledgeable about the global warming issue, much more concerned about the integrity of climate science, listening to skeptics, and a blogger (for better or for worse).”

In recounting her story, Curry writes:

Continue Reading »

I’ve been meaning to catch up on the discussions over Buddhism and objects/relations, Slavoj Zizek’s critique of “Western Buddhism,” and related topics, which have been continuing on Tim Morton’s Ecology Without Nature, Jeffrey Bell’s Aberrant Monism, Skholiast’s Speculum Criticum Traditionis, and elsewhere. I haven’t quite caught up, but here are a few quick notes on some of what’s been said…

1) Michael at Archive Fire rightfully points to the virtues of Jeffrey Bell‘s lucidly articulated point that

Continue Reading »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Skip to toolbar