July 1, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
It will be quite an event for Peirce scholars.
My proposed paper will be on applications of Peirce to film theory, and in particular the two neo- (quasi-?) Peircian approaches that I present in Ecologies of the Moving Image. The first of these builds on Sean Cubitt’s three-part typology of the image (pixel–cut–vector, which I rework as spectacle–sequentiality–semiosis); I’ve written about it before on this blog and elsewhere. The second develops Peirce’s three normative sciences (aesthetics, ethics, logic) into a logo-ethico-aesthetics of viewership.
Here’s a quick encapsulation of the latter:
Continue Reading »
Posted in Cinema, Media ecology | Tagged aesthetics, ethics, logic, Peirce, Peirce Centennial Congress | Leave a Comment »
June 24, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![https://i0.wp.com/www.wlu.ca/press/Images/Covers/ivakhiv.jpg?resize=205%2C307](https://i0.wp.com/www.wlu.ca/press/Images/Covers/ivakhiv.jpg?resize=205%2C307)
Ecologies of the Moving Image will be out next month. (Some seven years after I started working on it.) Here is a poster for it.
Many thanks to Steven Shaviro and Sean Cubitt for their generous endorsements, which I reproduce here:
“Ecologies of the Moving Image is an ambitious book, and a capacious and satisfying one. Continue Reading »
Posted in Media ecology | Tagged ecocinema studies, Ecologies of the Moving Image | Leave a Comment »
June 19, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
The AAR panel responding to 2013 Holberg Prize winner Bruno Latour’s Gifford Lectures has now been scheduled. Information is as follows.
![https://i0.wp.com/lh5.ggpht.com/--xAfcTWGDjA/S7Vkj9ggieI/AAAAAAAFu-4/tPWceZDV1UI/Bosch%25252C%252520Garden%252520of%252520Earthly%252520Delights%2525201510.jpg?resize=323%2C355](https://i0.wp.com/lh5.ggpht.com/--xAfcTWGDjA/S7Vkj9ggieI/AAAAAAAFu-4/tPWceZDV1UI/Bosch%25252C%252520Garden%252520of%252520Earthly%252520Delights%2525201510.jpg?resize=323%2C355)
QUERYING NATURAL RELIGION: IMMANENCE, GAIA, & THE PARLIAMENT OF LIVELY THINGS
Continue Reading »
Posted in Academe, Philosophy, Spirit matter | Tagged Gaia, Gifford Lectures, immanence, Latour, natural religion | 2 Comments »
May 28, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![https://i0.wp.com/3.bp.blogspot.com/_eHKK4ilcZXg/TH_q9en0GUI/AAAAAAAAEc4/QsoAoiG1i9o/s1600/up+the+yangtze+family.jpg?resize=237%2C201](https://i0.wp.com/3.bp.blogspot.com/_eHKK4ilcZXg/TH_q9en0GUI/AAAAAAAAEc4/QsoAoiG1i9o/s1600/up+the+yangtze+family.jpg?resize=237%2C201)
A key question for a process-relational account of a film is the question of how that film shows objects and subjects in the process of being made — how it shows subjectivation and objectivation arising together. Much of Ecologies of the Moving Image is about this, but what remains more implicit throughout the book is the way in which film itself expresses subjectivation.
I thought of this while re-watching Up the Yangtze, Yung Chang’s documentary about a “farewell cruise” on the Yangtze River before the completion of the final phase of the Three Gorges Dam.
Continue Reading »
Posted in Cinema, Media ecology, Process-relational thought | Tagged Up the Yangtze | 1 Comment »
May 22, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![](https://i0.wp.com/24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lm8hnuT66W1qhqfw3o1_1280.jpg?resize=254%2C168)
Teaching my film course (especially in its current rendition as “Ecology Film Philosophy”) and the book that goes with it (Ecologies of the Moving Image, which will be publicly available in July) — and especially teaching the Andrei Tarkovsky film Stalker, which serves as a sort of template for the book — makes me feel like the Stalker in the film.
“Stalkers” are guides to the Zone Continue Reading »
Posted in Cinema, Media ecology | Tagged Chernobyl, Stalker, Tarkovsky, Zone | 1 Comment »
May 11, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![](https://i0.wp.com/blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/files/2013/05/400ppm.jpg?resize=199%2C199)
More here and here and here.
We haven’t been there in
Can someone please turn down the thermostat?
*The exclamation mark that was originally in this title bothered me; seemed too celebratory (hardly the intent). So I’ve trashed it.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
April 22, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
Composing a worthwhile Earth Day post takes more energy than I have today, so instead I’ll link to Jeremy’s Earth post at Struggle Forever! It articulates a thought I often feel on this day (surrounded as I get by students eager to maternalize the planet) but in a way that resonates with the weirdness of the last week, with its bombs, explosions, and highly mediated manhunts.
A few snippets:
The Earth is not your mother . . . S/h/it is a monstrous assemblage . . . Earth Day is a dark holiday. It is a reminder, not of the beauty of nature or the miracle of life, but of the horrors that we have wrought upon the rocky surface of this planet . . .
And the picture says a great deal:
![Earth_at_Night](http://i1.wp.com/struggleforever.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Earth_at_Night.jpg?resize=300%2C225)
Continue Reading »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Earth Day, end times | Leave a Comment »
April 19, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
Here’s what I’m slated to teach this summer, for 3 weeks beginning May 20.
![Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2](https://i0.wp.com/blog.uvm.edu/aivakhiv/files/2013/04/Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2.jpg?resize=364%2C280)
Ecology – Film – Philosophy
Continue Reading »
Posted in Media ecology | Leave a Comment »
April 7, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
The list of advisors for this new book series in Ecocritical Theory and Practice shows just how the field of ecocriticism has internationalized over the last two decades. I’m pleased to be part of it.
Ecocritical Theory and Practice Book Series
Lexington Books, Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
Ecocritical Theory and Practice highlights innovative scholarship at the interface of literary/cultural studies and the environment, seeking to foster an ongoing dialogue between academics and environmental activists. Works that explore Continue Reading »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ecocriticism | Leave a Comment »
April 4, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
Says NASA:
“It turns out that roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The rest – everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter – adds up to less than 5% of the Universe. Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn’t be called “normal” matter at all, since it is such a small fraction of the Universe.” [italics added]
Continue Reading »
Posted in Spirit matter | Tagged cosmology, dark energy, dark matter, speculative realism, time | 4 Comments »
March 25, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![Supermind & Son](https://i0.wp.com/images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090120223243/pdsh/images/thumb/1/16/Supermind_%26_Son.jpg/250px-Supermind_%26_Son.jpg?resize=207%2C154)
The following provides an updated diagram and some further notes pertaining to my three-part article “What A Bodymind Can Do.” The earlier parts can be read here: part 1, part 2, part 3. (Please note that this version has corrected a minor error in the originally posted article, and added a bit more information at the end.)
“What A Bodymind Can Do” was an attempt to map the possibilities of human perception, action, and realization by synthesizing Shinzen Young’s systematization of mindfulness meditation practices (primarily Buddhist, but with reference to others) with a process-relational framework rooted in Whiteheadian process metaphysics and the triadic phenomenology of C. S. Peirce.
Continue Reading »
Posted in Spirit matter | Tagged bodymind, Buddhism, categories, experience, Mahayana, meditation, mindfulness, Peirce, Shinzen Young | 2 Comments »
March 11, 2013 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
![3.2Cover](https://i0.wp.com/www.csj.ualberta.ca/imaginations/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/3.2Cover-791x1024.jpg?resize=207%2C267)
While it’s been out for several months now, the current issue of Imaginations: Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies, a special issue on Sighting Oil, deserves more press than it’s gotten.
The journal is housed at the University of Alberta, which makes it particularly well situated to critically observe the development of Alberta’s infamous Tar Sands. The issue features several critical as well as visual essays on oil (including one by Allan Stoekl on peak oil), tar sands and pipeline politics, visual representation, “dark ecology,” BP and its Gulf Oil Spill, and much else.
(And here’s one thing we’ve been doing about it: Vermont towns say no to Tar Sands oil.)
Posted in Eco-culture | Tagged oilpocalypse | 2 Comments »
« Newer Posts - Older Posts »