In a process-relational view, there are no crazies. There are those who subjectivate with the aid of habits developed in response to conditions that have changed sufficiently that those habits are no longer very effective, or are not considered appropriate by others. Calling someone — and treating someone as — “crazy” is a way of […]
Archive for the ‘Process-relational thought’ Category
For the moment
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged ecosophy-G, moment, pre-G, Whitehead on May 14, 2012 | 8 Comments »
Now that a very busy semester has ended, I can return to the constructive speculative-metaphysical strand of this blog, in which I work out the process-relational philosophy I’ve tentatively labelled Ecosophy-G. A suitable acronym for this project might be “pre-G” (process-relational ecosophy-G), pronounced “pree-jee,” with the “pre” also indicating that the philosophy is a form […]
Whitehead’s return, ecology’s boon
Posted in Eco-theory, Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged environmental philosophy, object-oriented philosophy, process philosophy, speculative realism, Whitehead on April 29, 2012 | 12 Comments »
“Ultimately, the thinking of speculative pragmatism that is activist philosophy belongs to nature. Its aesthetico-politics compose a nature philosophy. The occurrent arts in which it exhibits itself are politics of nature. “The one-word summary of its relational-qualitative goings on: ecology. Activist philosophy concerns the ecology of powers of existence. Becomings in the midst. Creative change […]
Thinking through threes (& deities)
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, Spirit matter, tagged deity, dialectics, Peirce, polytheism, theism on March 14, 2012 | 14 Comments »
One of the things that Ecologies of the Moving Image has left unresolved, and left me needing to think more about, is the extent to which my Peircian “triadism” holds up. Philosophically, the case for some sort of triadism as a way of getting around dualisms is, at first blush, appealing. But there are […]
Process-objects at The Nonhuman Turn
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Nonhuman Turn, object-oriented philosophy, speculative realism on February 28, 2012 | 10 Comments »
The preliminary schedule is out for The Nonhuman Turn in 21st Century Studies. The list of speakers reads like a “who’s who” of the neo-ontological, speculative-realist crowd in cultural and media theory: Steven Shaviro, Jane Bennett, Brian Massumi, Erin Manning, Mark Hansen, Ian Bogost, and Tim Morton are among the keynotes, while lesser mortals like […]
Life outside the lava lamp
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged lava lamps, object-oriented philosophy on August 17, 2011 | 17 Comments »
Over at Naught Thought, Ben Woodard (sorry, Ben, for the earlier misspell) wants “to know what the Process/Relational folks think” of his thoughts about philosophies of process versus philosophies of objects or substances (or something like that). What follows is one quick and dirty way of thinking of a certain key difference between these two […]
On theism/nihilism & other things
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, Spirit matter, tagged cosmology, nihilism, panentheism, pantheism, speculative realism, theism, Whitehead on July 19, 2011 | 2 Comments »
The Speculative Realist blogosphere has recently been alight with debates over the role of religion, God, theism versus nihilism, the secular and the “post-secular,” and other such things. Since these are topics I’m naturally interested, and somewhat invested, in, I ought to participate, but time constraints have made that all but impossible for me recently. […]
Grosz’s postmodern Darwinism
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged Darwin, Deleuze, feminism, Grosz on July 3, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Among the books coming out in this fall’s Duke University Press catalog (pdf) is one I’m particularly looking forward to: Elizabeth Grosz’s Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Grosz is among the most exciting thinkers in the post-Deleuzian landscape — a tremendous synthesist of the biological (especially Darwinian), philosophical (especially “vital materialist”), […]
Malick’s tangled bank
Posted in Cinema, Process-relational thought, tagged film, flow, life, Malick, nature on June 27, 2011 | 3 Comments »
It will take some time before I can say anything very intelligible about Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life. But here are some initial thoughts, for what they’re worth. (1) This is the film in which Malick just lets it go, and lets it flow…
After Nature
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought on June 22, 2011 | Comments Off on After Nature
After Nature, the new blog hosted by process-relational ecophilosophical fellow traveler Leon Niemoczynski, now has an RSS feed. That means that I can enthusiastically recommend that philosophically inclined readers of this blog subscribe to it. Leon is author of Charles Sanders Peirce and a Religious Metaphysics of Nature. The five most popular tags on his […]
Those objects in the rearview mirror…
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, tagged integral theory, object-oriented philosophy, Whitehead on June 17, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Differences are starting to emerge in our group reading of Integral Ecology, with Tim Morton taking a grumpy stance from the back of the car while others are measured but generally more positive in their assessments. Tim’s main criticism seems to be the Object-Oriented Ontological one that E/Z’s categories “map perfectly onto normal everyday human […]
What a bodymind can do – Part 2
Posted in Philosophy, Process-relational thought, Spirit matter, tagged Buddhism, meditation, mindfulness, Peirce, practice, Shinzen Young, Whitehead on May 30, 2011 | 1 Comment »
This continues from the previous post, where Shinzen Young’s model of core mindfulness practices was expanded into a system of classifying what a human bodymind can do. Here the model is deepened following the process-relational insights that are at the core of Shinzen’s system as well as of other (especially Mahayana and Vajrayana) Buddhist systems, […]