Michael at Archive Fire just shared a good quote from Latour on Whitehead, “king of the realists.” Funny thing — I just finished up some comments introducing Whitehead to my ecocinema students… The upshot of those comments is that, according to Whitehead’s attempt to rewire the metaphysics of the western world, there are no things, just events, happenings; and in order to understand events, you have to understand processes; and to do that, you have to learn to think in threes instead of twos — oops, that’s Peirce (the next piece of the philosophical puzzle that’s accompanying the course). Getting ahead of myself there… But, then, that’s the nature of process, always moving forward (while looking back)…
realism, or bust
September 2, 2010 by Adrian J Ivakhiv
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Whitehead | 1 Comment
One Response
Leave a Reply
Categories
- Academe (108)
- Anthropocene (75)
- Blog stuff (52)
- Cinema (88)
- Climate change (75)
- Cultural politics (45)
- Eco-culture (174)
- Eco-theory (55)
- Manifestos & auguries (41)
- Media ecology (120)
- Music & soundscape (39)
- Philosophy (261)
- Politics (166)
- Process-relational thought (101)
- Science & society (36)
- Spirit matter (128)
- Uncategorized (57)
- Visual culture (88)
Translate
Archives
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Subscribe2
Top Posts & Pages
Popular resources
Lyme disease & beyond: a bibliographic resourceHumming the New Earth (on the "global Hum")
33⅓ Environmental Studies greats (or, a canon revisited) (2015)
Books of the decade in ecocultural theory, 2020
Books of the decade in ecocultural theory, 2010
Between Continental and environmental philosophy (2009)
Books & articles
Selected interviews, talks, music
Apocalyptic Anxieties, SFU, 2023
SFU Global Humanities interview
KCSB Selectric Davyland interview
The Zone is Us (Vermont Humanities, 2022)
What’s on my Bandcamp music page
Soundcloud playlist (music sampler)
Krista Tippett On Being (Speaking of Faith) interview
Associated sites
Immanence on Facebook
- This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States license.
I thought I heard a bit of Peirce when you mentioned thinking in threes. Most of my familiarity with him is secondhand, however, though a former semiotics professor, Paul Ryan.