The New York Times offers a history in maps of the Ukraine crisis, here.
The New York Times offers a history in maps of the Ukraine crisis, here.
Rory McFinn offers a handy set of guidelines for distinguishing Ukraine crisis commentators who don’t know much about Ukraine from those who do, here.
in “Peering Through the Fog of War,” Observer Ukraine’s Marco Bojcun provides another solid analysis of the current situation of unannounced war between Russia and Ukraine.
An excerpt:
“If on the one side we heard the apologists of the Kremlin insisting all this is just a Ukrainian civil war without Russian state intervention, from the other side we have had yet another kind of illusory and hopeful thinking: that the Ukrainian government can win the war in the east militarily, that with just a little more firepower the separatists can be defeated. And Russia would have to accept that fact and back off. The illusion in this line of thinking is twofold: first, that for Russia the goals of the war are limited to the subordination of Ukraine; and second, that the outcome of this war will be decided by the balance of brute force on the front.”
An Olympics-scale performance staged on August 9 in the Crimean military port of Sevastopol depicted the official Russian version of Ukraine’s Maidan revolution — complete with huge dancing human swastikas, lynchings, burnings, firings of Kalashnikovs, and symbols depicting the US (dollar signs, eagles, the Eye of Providence), the Right Sector, and the Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics.”
Ostensibly organized by Russian biker club “Night Wolves” (Ночные волки) but clearly with a massive budget, the performance was broadcast nationally on the Rossiya-2 (Russia 2) state television network. Rather like Cirque du Soleil staging some Al-Qaedaesque millenarian nightmare, and bringing to mind Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will, it is a disturbing example of what happens when cultural institutions are harnessed in the name of wartime propaganda.
Mat Babiak, editor of the Euromaidan Press web site, provides a detailed analysis (with numerous still photos) here. The original show in its entirety can be viewed on Rossiya-2. The web site for the “Triumphant Bike Show,” which began in Moscow and ended in Sevastopol, is here. For some images of the bikers themselves, see Google’s image database.
While the comments on the Euromaidan site reflect the shock, dismay, and befuddlement of Ukrainian viewers, those on the Russian Twitter feed express the delight of many Russian “patriotic” viewers.
The Center for Society Research has released its extensive report analyzing protests taking place in Ukraine between November 21 of last year and February 23, 2014. The report, according to its authors,
“is the first attempt to analyze Maidan based on the results of systematic research on protests, repressions and concessions of protesters in Ukraine.”
It appears that conservative groups — including the self-proclaimed media “watchdog” Accuracy in Media (AIM) — are now using Russia to try to discredit western environmentalist’ opposition to fracked natural gas and shale oil production.
See AIM director Cliff Kincaid’s article “Moscow Mobilizes its American Agents.”
Given the shooting down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 and the high likelihood it was a casualty of Putin’s strategy of tacit support (and verbal denial of that support) for eastern Ukraine’s armed rebels, it would be good to remind us what we need to get things back on the right track in Ukraine.
While I hope that Russia’s support for the armed rebels will subside, I tend to side with those, like Anatol Lieven, Ivan Katchanovski, and Oxana Shevel, who argue that all sides must be prepared to give something up toward a larger negotiated settlement.
Shevel’s final paragraph, from her Washington Post piece “Will the Malaysia Airlines tragedy change the trajectory of events in Ukraine?,” is worth citing in full:
“Prospects for lasting peace and the end of conflict in Ukraine remain elusive, although it is possible to imagine a scenario whereby this incident reduced the level of fighting in Ukraine. Such a scenario would likely involve a truce to allow investigators access to the crash site, a gradual transformation of this truce into a lasting cease-fire; the decisive end of Russia’s support for the separatists in exchange of avoiding further sanctions; the return of Russian fighters to Russia and broad amnesty offered to Ukrainian citizens who participated in the insurgency; a more comprehensive decentralization initiative that would give more autonomy to Ukraine’s regions than the one unveiled by President Poroshenko recently; and snap local legislative elections to give the people of the Donbas (and other Ukrainian regions) legitimate representatives who can speak for their interests in the post-Yanukovych era. This is a scenario under which none of the parties in the conflict would get their ultimate preference, but in which violence would begin to recede. Whether any of this is possible as long as the key actors in the conflict continue to think they can win outright, though, remains to be seen.”
In “A Popular Front for Russian Nationalism,” Dale Street of the British socialist Workers Liberty web site provides a thorough analysis (and deconstruction) of the so-called Yalta Declaration. It includes a detailed assessment of who the Ukrainians, Russians, and westerners were who attended the Crimean conference that resulted in this (one-sided) statement.
Anton Shekhovtsov’s “Look Far Right, and Look Right Again” provides a sober assessment of the nationalist far right both in Russia, where it is well established, and in Ukraine, where it is making more inroads than some concede (but not as many as others claim).
In “Putin’s Failing Ukraine Scorecard,” Forbes’s Paul Roderick Gregory lays out the case against the more popular narrative that Putin has succeeded in “outwitting” the West in Crimea and eastern Ukraine.
While I agree that Putin’s success in Ukraine itself appears limited, he remains very popular in Russia, and as the EU elections showed, seems to have a growing number of supporters in the European right (and far left). The jury is still out on whether and to what extent he is failing in his goals.