Putin/Trump vs. Chichkan: what’s at stake

16 08 2025

The full horror of what is happening, and what has been happening for at least six months, may be starting to sink in for a few more people around the world.

As Russia continues its bombing campaign, having launched more than 14 times as many drones and missiles in July (well over 6,000) as it did over the same month last year, President Trump gave war criminal Vladimir Putin the red carpet treatment in the former Russian colonial territory, now U.S. state, of Alaska.

The meaning of this meeting might be analyzed for years, but that it signified a capitulation — if only to Russia’s desire for neo-imperial status — should be clear. It was, as Ruth Ben-Ghiat puts it, a summit to legitimize Kremlin geopolitics — the “make Russia great again ‘summit’,” a “summit” that was primarily “about the breaking of taboos, in this case, the welcoming onto American territory of Putin, who has an International Criminal Court arrest warrant out for him for war crimes in Ukraine.”

Or, as Bill King puts it, “For Putin, it was the dream package: red carpet rolled out, a fighter jet flyover, and an American president who treats the job like a time-share pitch. For Trump, it was just another stop in his travelling scam carnival, where the prizes are for him, the bill is for you, and the game is always rigged.”

Despite the protests that made it into some of the media coverage (alongside pro-Trump counter-demonstrations), it also reflects a capitulation of democracy to the kind of multipolar imperial realignment both men desire. That’s perhaps what made it worthwhile for Trump, but much more of a success for Putin. (The body language analyses are also always entertaining.)

In “Trump’s Self-Own Summit with Putin,” The New Yorker‘s Susan Glasser breaks down the background to this meeting:

Right around the time that Trump was on the tarmac, clapping for the butcher of Bucha, his fund-raising team sent out the following e-mail:

Attention please, I’m meeting with Putin in Alaska! It’s a little chilly. THIS MEETING IS VERY HIGH STAKES for the world. The Democrats would love nothing more than for ME TO FAIL. No one in the world knows how to make deals like me!

The backdrop for this uniquely Trumpian combination of braggadocio and toxic partisanship was, of course, anything but a master class in successful deal-making; rather, the impetus for the summit was the President’s increasing urgency to produce a result after six months of failure to end the war in Ukraine—a task he once said was so easy that it would be done before he even returned to office in January. Leading up to the Alaska summit, nothing worked: Not berating Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, in the Oval Office. Not begging Putin to “STOP” his bombing. Not even a U.S.-floated proposal to essentially give Putin much of what he had demanded. Trump gave Putin multiple deadlines—fifty days, two weeks, “ten or twelve days”—to agree to a ceasefire and come to the table, then did nothing when Putin balked. When his latest ultimatum expired, on August 8th, instead of imposing tough new sanctions, as he had threatened, Trump announced that he would meet Putin in Alaska a week later, minus Zelensky, in effect ending the Russian’s global isolation in exchange for no apparent concessions aimed at ending the war that Putin himself had unleashed.

In the end, the war will continue because Russia will continue to pursue its goals, which it showed no desire to temper. And Ukrainians will continue to die.

Among the more notable ones that died this past week, from injuries sustained on the front lines, were artist, anarchist, and Ukrainian freedom fighter David Chichkan. In “‘For Him Russia Exemplified Modern Fascism’,” The Kyiv Independent‘s Kate Tsurkan has penned a beautiful obituary to Chichkan (also spelled Chychkan). Another nice tribute, with examples of Chichkan’s art, is Amira Barkhush’s “Russia Looted Ukrainian Artist’s Masterpieces and Then Killed His Great-grandson.”

Juxtaposing this one man dying for the freedom of his countrymen and women against the two wannabe emperors meeting in Alaska is perhaps the best way to show what is at stake in this struggle of grassroots democracy against imperialist autocracy.

That struggle is now clearly global.

“Anti-authoritarian defenders of Ukraine,” 2022. Size A4, liner and watercolor on paper. (David Chichkan/Facebook)

David Chichkan, a Ukrainian artist and anarchist known for his political art, who was killed while serving on the front line in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Ukraine, in August 2025, in an undated photo. (Anton Parambul/Facebook)

Read the rest of this entry »




Z visits the emperor

1 03 2025

There was no mistake about yesterday’s reality-TV spectacle of Volodymyr Zelensky being berated by Donald Trump and J.D. Vance.

Trump may or may not be the world’s first reality-TV president, but he is certainly the world’s first reality-TV emperor. He would like the world to see him holding court as world leaders come to him like the three kings to Jesus.

Vance was clearly prepared to be his attack dog (his pro-Putin sympathies are known and perhaps even better understood than Trump’s). The MAGA-spiked press corps — like the Real America’s Voice correspondent (Brian Glenn, partner of Marjorie Taylor Greene) who attacked Zelensky for not wearing a suit — and the likelihood that Zelensky was treated this way all day preceding this press appearance, can all be considered part of the set-up for this stage. By failing to keep his cool, Zelensky fell into their trap. But the situation was calculated to make him do that.

But Zelensky also succeeded in demonstrating that truth need not so easily cave in to imperial niceties. That will go down better with many Ukrainians (57% of whom trust him, according to last week’s data), and with others around the world who care about democracy, liberty, and the other values the US has pretended to represent to the world, that Ukrainians today actually die for, and that Europeans are being called to defend. By the same token, caving into Trump’s attempted extortion of Ukraine’s “raw earth,” as he kept calling it, without any security guarantees, would likely not have served Zelensky well.

Peace, in this case, will not be found through the “deal” Trump wants, which seems calculated to give Putin everything he wants, or close to it, and to give the US something “back” for the money it’s spent (which is far less than Trump claims), as if that will magically lead to Russia abstaining from chewing off more of Ukraine in the future, and of regaining the political-economic and informational influence it had over Ukrainians until 2014.

There’s a case to be made that someone must lead the “free world,” now that Trump has dislodged any idea that there even is such a world. (It’s a problematic idea, to be sure, but not entirely lacking in substance.) From that perspective, Zelensky did pretty well in reminding leaders that emperors do not deserve everything they ask for.

It’s also important, in this context, to remind people that there’s a neo-imperial vision at play here — one in which Trump would like to get “his” North America, from Panama to Greenland and the Arctic, along with pieces elsewhere (the Gaza strip, Ukraine), while allowing his global peers (Putin and Xi) to rule their own spheres of influence through unchecked power.

What’s at stake, in other words, is the fledgling world order of sovereign nations (at least some of which are democratic), international agreements (on topics from climate change to nuclear proliferation), and the rule of something resembling law.








Skip to toolbar