Posts

Kicking Off Year Two of Our USDA CARE Grant in Hemp Fiber: A Visit to Our Partner Farm

Beginning in the 2023 growing season, the Northwest Crops and Soils team (NWCST) embarked on a three year USDA CARE grant entitled Hemp Fiber: Building Farmer Capacity to Meet the Opportunities and Challenges of a new Market. The grant features 5 research trials on the Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh and one trial at our partner farm owned by bast fiber researcher, artist, and educator Andrea Myklebust of Danby, VT. Last week, NWCST research specialist Laura Sullivan visited Andrea to check in on the trials and collect emergence data in the satellite plots. In partnership with this grant, Andrea will be observing the effects of Harvest Timing on two varieties, while also conducting her own grant-funded research on hemp and flax characteristics.

The plants were roughly two weeks old and 8in tall, with healthy thick stands. Laura and Andrea recorded emergence populations by counting the number of plants in a one foot section of a row, as many as ten times in each plot. All were thriving at the time of data collection, but have since suffered some lodging due to the heavy and persistent rains.

Pictured on left is Andrea’s 2024 fiber research plots. Hemp is situated on the left with flax shown on the right. Pictured on the right are two-week old Tiborszallasi fiber hemp plants growing densely in Danby, VT, June 2024.

They also spent some time processing fiber and ruminating on the impacts of various methods of retting on fiber. The fiber shown below was left out exposed to the elements for the duration of winter, giving a softness not yet seen by the pair in their years of research-grown samples.

Fiber that had been grown in the 2023 season and stored unretted caught the attention of Laura for its golden colored stalks. Many say that fiber, when allowed to sit for months between harvest and processing, will yield a nicer, finer fiber than stalks processed right away. This is something that we will continue to study as the seasons turn and we are able to accumulate material for post-harvest processing experimentation.

On the left Laura holds notably soft fiber that was retted in a combination of ways involving both winter retting and water retting.  On the right is Andrea standing with her unretted and dried fiber grown in the 2023 season.

Also grabbing attention was this netted bag (picture shown above), constructed by Andrea’s daughter Tansy. Tansy utilized hemp from Andrea’s 2023 crop for the netting. Andrea has devoted many years to her craft as a textile expert and educator as well as a bast fiber researcher. Laura was impressed with her ingenuity for creating her own tools from found objects to accomplish her objectives.  The photos below shows a makeshift distaff (tool used for spinning long bast fibers) made from a pitchfork mounted in an umbrella stand. When in use, a spinner pulls fiber from the distaff and feeds it into the spinning wheel (picture on left), and a spinning wheel crafted from a bike tire (picture on right).

Andrea shared that she was inspired to make this spinning wheel when she grew tired of hearing folks who would come to watch her spin at events say things like, “this is how they used to make yarn”. Using a modern material in the spinning wheel has the ability to shatter the perception that no one is doing things like this anymore, or that they don’t have any modern value. Laura and Andrea have been working together to create an archive of handspun samples from each of the various treatments represented in the USDA CARE grant trials. So far they have a complete set from the 2023 Seeding Rate and Harvest Date Trials, making for a one-of-a-kind record of data that will be utilized in determining agronomic best practices for hemo fiber farmers going forward.

If you would like to learn more, don’t miss our upcoming field Day at the Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh on Thursday July 25th 2024. Laura and Andrea are expected to be present and ready to answer all your hemp fiber-related questions. Online registration is at https://go.uvm.edu/2024annualfieldday.

Pictured on the right are yarn samples of each treatment in the 2023 Hemp Fiber Seeding Rate Trial at the Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh, VT. On the left are Laura Sullivan and Andrea Myklebust checking in on the two week old hemp plots at Mountain Heart Farm in Danby Vt. June 2024.

Biosecurity Considerations for Dairy or Livestock Farm Service Providers & Extension Personnel

Prevention of the spread of livestock disease is the responsibility of anyone who works with or on farms.  Be prepared to take the appropriate measures to protect the farms you visit and minimize the risk of introducing disease.

When visiting any livestock farm:

or sanitize boots upon entering the farm premise and when leaving with approved chemicals EPA’s Registered Antimicrobial Products Effective Against Avian Influenza [List M] | US EPA. There are many locations these products can be found including Amazon.com, https://farmerboyag.com, and farm supply stores.

  • Limit farm visits to one farm per day

or wear disposable coveralls or change clothing between visits

  • Avoid cross contamination from traveling between animal feeding areas, feed storage, milking facilities or transfer areas and animal housing
  • Sanitize any sampling equipment upon entering and leaving the farm
  • Park in identified parking areas.  Avoid driving in feeding areas, feed storage areas, milk transfer areas, equipment traffic lanes or animal housing.  Vehicle tires should be clean and free from organic matter.
  • Wear disposable gloves when handling animals, feed or manure.  Wash hands with soap and water.
  • Avoid direct contact with livestock.
  • Make biosecurity practices easy: if you visit farms frequently keep a prepared tote in your vehicle with the supplies that you may need:
    • Clean boots
    • Boot wash bucket or tub and brush
    • Sanitizing chemical for boots and equipment
    • Disposable, single use plastic boot covers
    • Clean clothing, coveralls or disposable coveralls
    • Disposable gloves
    • Hand sanitizer
    • Trash bags
    • Water

When planning for and facilitating on farm events or workshops:

  • Only do so with the owner’s permission and make sure the producer is comfortable with opening their farm to the public.  Consider the risk level of the participant audience for the event:
  • Low risk: event participants present very little risk of introducing disease to the farm because they have no other livestock contact and do not frequently visit farms.
  • Moderate risk: event participants present some risk of introducing disease to the farm because they regularly work on farms but have little to no contact with livestock or feed and follow biosecurity protocols during their farm visits.
  • High risk: event participants present risk of introducing disease to the farm because they are regularly in direct contact with livestock.
  • Communicate with the producer and participants prior to the event about biosecurity measures, protocols and expectations for the event.
  • Provide biosecurity signage to the producer as needed; Establish and communicate boundaries for where participants may and may not have access to on the farm.  Printable signage is available at Biosecurity – National Dairy FARM Program
  • Clearly label or communicate where participants should park.  Avoid vehicles driving in feeding areas, feed storage, milk transfer areas, equipment traffic lanes or animal housing.  All vehicle tires should be clean and free from visible organic matter.
  • Provide disposable, single-use plastic boots for all participants.  Boots should not be removed during the event and should be replaced if they become damaged at any time while in use.
  • Provide waste collection and disposal of used plastic boots upon conclusion of the event.
  • Avoid direct contact between participants and livestock.
  • Provide hand sanitizer or hand washing stations to participants.
  • Avoid participant travel between animal feeding areas, feed storage, milking facilities or transfer areas and animal housing.
  • Be flexible in planning your event and be prepared to cancel if concern or risk increases.
  • Collect contact information for all participants in case follow-up communication is needed.
  •  Additional farm biosecurity resources, training and information:

    Home – Healthy Farms Healthy Agriculture

    Dairy-Cattle-Biosecurity-Recommendations-Influenza-V1.1.pdf (nmpf.org)

    H5N1 in Dairy Cattle – NMPF



    The NOVUS C.O.W.S. Program – A Tool for Making Progress

    It’s no secret that dairy production and management are constantly evolving systems.  The day-to-day chores of milking, feeding, cleaning and the fixing of all things that break may sometimes feel redundant.  The long term and big picture of these tasks is that we can always do better – make improvements to save money, save time, save labor, improve cow health, increase milk production and quality – make progress. Sometimes challenging aspects of the business are projects that are easy to spot and prioritize.  Sometimes the list is long and it’s impossible to find a starting point.  We can help.

    NOVUS International is an animal nutrition company with the mission to “inspire every animal producer and owner on the planet. As relentless advocates for intelligent nutrition, [they] deliver advanced technology, rooted in scientific research designed to help their animals reach their full potential.”  If you are a dairy producer in the Northeast (and beyond) working with a nutritionist to feed your cows, it is likely that you feed one of the NOVUS mineral products developed to enhance immune function, reproductive performance, milk yield and components, or hoof health.  Including NOVUS mineral packages in your ration makes you eligible for the NOVUS C.O.W.S. Program.

    The C.O.W.S. Program began as a grad student project and has evolved into a detailed farm assessment done by a highly skilled team of technicians with access to a database of benchmark information collected from thousands of dairy operations and all the relevant research. 

    How it works: The team conducts a detailed on-farm evaluation which includes completing a questionnaire with the farm manager to help identify areas of concern, collects cow side data, records observations, and takes facility measurements.  Evaluations may include:

    • Locomotion, hock, manure, and/or body condition scoring
    • Attaching loggers to a representative sample of cows to monitor and record time budget information
    • Temperature, humidity and air flow data collection to assess heat stress
    • Stall usage, measurements and bedding assessment
    • Stocking density evaluation for feed bunk space, stall and water access
    Cows with loggers attached to their legs with vet wrap.  The loggers stay on for 5-7 days and records bout length and time spent standing or lying down.

    After processing all the information, the team builds a customized report for the farm which includes benchmark comparisons to similar operations according to location, size, production and facility type.  The NOVUS team then coordinates an in-person meeting to review the report with the farm’s team – managers, owners, stockholders, veterinarians, nutritionists, hoof trimmers, and technical assistance providers.  Anyone who is invested in the farm’s success can be at the table.  The meeting is a conversation that produces an action plan of do-able solutions and identifies short- and long-term goals.

    The NOVUS C.O.W.S.  Program is available free of charge to eligible farms.  If this sounds like the next right step for your operation, inquire with your nutritionist or reach out to UVM Extension Northwest Crops and Soils Dairy Research Specialist Amber Machia (amber.machia@uvm.edu or 802-355-2653).

    More information about the NOVUS C.O.W.S. program is available on their website C.O.W.S. Program | Novus International, Inc. or https://www.novusint.com/services/cows/

    What’s growing on your crop? Foliar diseases of cereal grains

    Foliar diseases in cereal grains are important to pay attention to as they can suppress photosynthetic mechanisms which are needed to produce a healthy grain head. Foliar diseases can lead to reduced vigor, growth, and yield. If your grain is infected earlier in the season there is a greater chance of yield loss, if favorable conditions remain.

    Common Foliar Diseases of Grain

    Septoria Leaf Blotch (SLB)

    Affected Crops: Wheat, Barley, Rye

    Septoria Leaf Blotch (Parastagonospora nodorum) infects mature leaves starting at the midrib. Symptoms appear as small necrotic spots and coalesce into brown oval lesions, surrounded by a yellow halo. As the lesion develops black pin-head structures (Pycnidia) can be seen which hold white to pinkish asexual spores. SLB infection increases as temperatures raise between 68-80 F and high humidity holds for long periods of time. Rain is essential for spore dispersal. Infection which occurs on the ear can lead to Glume blotch and cause infection to kernels.

    Tan Spot

    Affected Crops: Wheat, Barley, Rye

    Tan Spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) can be confused with SLB infection, spore identification is needed for the correct diagnosis. Tan Spot lesions develop in the mid to upper canopy and form lens-shaped necrotic lesions with a yellow halo. Once wet, the lesion darkens and produces olive-brown spores. The disease develops in a wide range of temperatures but prefers 60-82 F with long periods of moisture. Late season infection can cause bleaching on the grain spikes, along with the browning of glumes and kernels turning a red to pink hue.  

    Barley Yellow Dwarf (BYD)

    Affected Crops: Wheat, Barley, Oats, Rye, Triticale

    BYD is a viral disease which is transmitted by aphid feeding. The tips of leaves tend to have a yellow or red discoloration, which can resemble a flame. Plants infected with BYD may be stunted. This virus is usually seen in patches among a field, but the size and distribution are dependent on the aphid’s activity. Be sure to monitor your fields for aphids to reduce the risk of having BYD transmitted to your crop.

    Powdery Mildew (PM)

    Affected Crops: Wheat, Barley, Oats, Rye, Triticale

    Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) prefers cooler conditions between 60-72 F with high humidity, 80% or higher. White, cottony fungal growth can be noticed on the upper surface of the leaf while the underside is yellow. As it matures, dark reproductive structures will form on the leaf surface. Plants can be more susceptible at times of rapid growth or after nitrogen application.

    Leaf Rust

    Affected Crops: Most common wheat, but can affect barley, rye, and triticale

    Leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) appears as small, orange-brown or reddish-brown lesions on the leaf surface, it can be found on the leaf sheath during periods of high infection. Leaf rust is common and can occur more frequently when temperatures are mild, between 59-77 F. Most often, leaf rust can overwinter on early drilled crops or previously infected volunteer plants.

    Management

    It is important to scout fields for signs of diseases or insects often, so you can manage risk properly. For many of these diseases managing a good crop rotation with non-host crops, weed and volunteer control, and not overapplying nitrogen may help reduce the risk of an outbreak.

    For more information and resources check out UVM Extension NW Crops and Soils Program- Grain Information

    All photo credits: Bugwood.org

    The Effect of Edge-spraying a Broad-spectrum Insecticide to Control Hop Arthropod Pests while Retaining Beneficial Arthropods

    Aroostook Hops, Westfield, ME

    Project Summary (full report available at www.aroostookhops.com)

    The purpose of this project was to determine if a broad-spectrum OMRI-certified insecticide can be used to control major pests of hops (including leafhoppers) to increase hop productivity without creating other pest management challenges or a reduction in beneficial arthropods. We used pyrethrin treatment in a one- and three-acre hopyard in several different regimes culminating in a final year of complete pyrethrin coverage. We sampled arthropods, plant biomass and yield, and hopperburn to determine if spray regime or location (edge versus interior) impacted measures of hop production and management. There was evidence from all three measures that pyrethrin positively impacted management of hops pests and improved yield in hops, without resulting in other pest management issues. Thus, we will continue to use and evaluation pyrethrin to target pest populations and we advise other farmers to consider this approach. However, there is evidence that leafhoppers are able to rapidly repopulate small hopyards and potential evidence of selection for resistance to pyrethrin treatment. Thus, this approach should utilize arthropod sampling or scouting to monitor effectiveness.

    Summary of Important Findings

    • Pyrethrin application may greatly reduce leafhopper abundance (although the effect may be short-lived)
    • Plant biomass and wet yield was higher in pyrethrin treated plots
    • Few to no aphids or two-spotted spider mites were detected during these years or in relation to pyrethrin application
    • The predominant leafhopper pest was NOT potato leafhopper (Empoasca fabae), but was a similar species in the genus Hebata (formerly Empoasca)
    Figure 1: count of leafhopper abundance on Cascade hops (above) or total beneficial arthropods (below) on sticky cards (Y-axis) versus sampling events (1-10) from early June to early September with Pyganic applications indicated by an arrow. Samples are from north (CAW1) or south (CAW41) hopyard edges or interior (CAW17). Figure 2 is below.

    This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under subaward number FNE21-977. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Roller Crimping Cereal Rye

    Rolling and crimping cereal rye is a strategy for cover crop termination in no-till systems, but the timing of rolling and crimping is crucial for success. Now is a good time to monitor the grow stage of your cereal rye. Rye should be rolled when plants reach anthesis (flowering). At this point the rye plants are mature enough that the stems will be “crimped” when flattened to the soil surface, crushing the cell walls of the stems. Rolling the rye too soon, prior to anthesis, will not kill the immature plants and the rye can “pop back up” and continue to grow. In Alburgh, VT, cereal rye planted in mid to late September will typically reach anthesis around the end of May or early June depending on weather conditions.

    To learn more about roller crimping, check out the Roller Crimping Cover Crops in Vermont: Benefits and Risks factsheet.

    For more information about no-till cropping systems, read our Guide to Implementing No-till Cropping Systems in the Northeast.

    As part of the 2020 Grain Growers Webinar Series, Dr. Erin Silva of the University of Wisconsin, Plant Pathology, gave a presentation on Cover Crop Based No-Till and Interseeding Techniques. View the recording of that webinar here to learn more about roller crimping cereal rye for no-till production systems.

    Cereal rye at anthesis. Photo credit: Dana Jokela (Iowa State University)
    10 ft I & J Crop Roller Crimper. Photo credit: I & J Manufacturing

    Planting with Neonicotinoid Treated Seed (NTS)

    Planting corn has begun! If you are planting corn treated with a neonicotinoid insecticide, make sure you are using best practices to minimize any movement of the seed treatment to off-target sites. Neonicotinoids can be extremely toxic to insects and even the dust created during planting can negatively impact beneficial insect populations like natural insect enemies and pollinators.

    So, what can you do to mitigate potential neonicotinoid harm?

    1. Contact your local beekeepers with the time you plan on planting your NTS with enough time for beekeepers to relocate any nearby hives.
    2. Follow American Seed Trade Association and CropLife America safety regulations found in The Guide to Seed Treatment Stewardship: https://seed-treatment-guide.com/
    3. Learn about risk management and target NTS pests like seedcorn maggot and wireworm with the factsheets below and watch the Managing Neonicotinoids in Row Crops webinar series.

    Resources can be found on UVM Extension Northwest Crops and Soil website: https://www.uvm.edu/extension/nwcrops

    Factsheets:

    Neonicotinoids & Risk Management: https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/Articles_and_Factsheets/Neonicotinoids_Risk_Management_Final.pdf

    Wireworm and Neonicotinoid Treated Seed in Row  Crops: https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/Articles_and_Factsheets/Neonicotinoid_and_Wireworm_Final.pdf

    Seedcorn Maggot and Neonicotinoid Treated Seed in Row Crops: https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/Articles_and_Factsheets/Neonicotinoid_and_Seedcorn_Maggot_Final.pdf

    Managing Neonicotinoids in Row Crops Webinar series: https://www.uvm.edu/extension/nwcrops/conferences-events-current-and-past

    HPAI H5N1 in U.S. Dairy Cattle Updates and Resources

    Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 is a virus historically carried by wild birds and was first identified in 1996.  The virus spread to domestic poultry and caused outbreaks in 2022 on U.S. commercial and backyard poultry operations resulting in high rates of mortality.  In March 2024,  HPAI H5N1 was identified in lactating dairy cattle on a dairy farm in Texas.  Much is unknown about how the virus spreads in cattle.  The virus appears to concentrate in the mammary tissue and may be shed in the milk of lactating dairy cattle.  There has been one confirmed case of HPAI H5N1 in a human that had contact with infected cattle in Texas.  These infections have been non-fatal and have had a 100% recovery rate.  Currently, there have been no confirmed cases of HPAI H5N1 in dairy cattle in Vermont or surrounding states.

    Animal Health Considerations

    Among the confirmed cases of HPAI cattle, most likely to be infected are older (second lactation and greater) that are in mid to late stage of lactation. Clinical signs of the virus in lactating cattle include decreased feed intake and milk production, thickened milk that may look like colostrum, fever, nasal discharge, and changes in manure texture and consistency.  Symptomatic animals should be isolated from healthy animals and treated with supportive therapy associated with depressed rumen activity and dehydration.  These cattle fully recover within 2-3 weeks.

    A fact sheet on HPAI H5N1 in U.S. Dairy Herds is available on the Northwest Crops and Soils website and linked here: Highly_Pathogenic_Avian_Influenza_H5N1_in_U.S._Dairy_Herds_April2024.pdf (uvm.edu)

    Milk Supply Safety

    Pasteurized milk and other dairy products, infant formula and beef have all tested negative for live or infectious HPAI virus.  Additional testing and research efforts by the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continue.  The commercial milk supply is safe.  Milk and meat from unhealthy animals are prohibited from entering the food supply. 

    Federal Order and Interstate Transport Guidelines

    A Federal Order announced by the USDA was made effective on April 29th to better track and understand any spread of HPAI H5N1 in livestock.  The order requires that all lactating cattle traveling across state lines test negative for the virus within 7 days of transport and move with a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection.  Interstate movement of lactating cattle to slaughter facilities (without any interim stops) may travel with Owner Shipper Statement documentation, which must be submitted to both the origin and destination state.  Lactating animals exhibiting any signs of illness are prohibited from interstate transport.

    The Owner Shipper Statement Form is available here: National OSS fillable form effective April 30, 2024.pdf (vermont.gov).  In Vermont this completed form should be emailed to agr.animalhealth@vermont.gov or stephanie.parks@vermont.gov

    Additional details regarding interstate movement of lactating dairy animals are available on the Northwest Crops and Soils website and linked here: HPAI_H5N1_In_Dairy_Cattle_Update_and_Federal_Order_5.2.24.pdf (uvm.edu)

    Testing

    Contact your herd veterinarian if you have animals exhibiting HPAI H5N1 symptoms or healthy animals that need to be transported across state lines.  A licensed veterinarian may submit milk (composite sample with milk from all 4 quarters) or nasal swab samples to be processed only by an approved National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) facility.

    Biosecurity

    Implementing a biosecurity plan on your dairy farm offers a greater level of protection against exposure to a variety of threats.  Much is still unknown about how HPAI H5N1 is spread.  In addition to standard farm biosecurity practices, precautions should be taken when handling symptomatic livestock and their milk, traveling between farms, or moving animals between farms.  A full list of disinfectant products that are effective against HPAI, including the active ingredients, product names, and required contact times is available on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website EPA’s Registered Antimicrobial Products Effective Against Avian Influenza [List M] | US EPA

    Dairy Biosecurity Recommendations for HPAI are available here: Dairy Biosecurity Recommendations for HPAI and More (aabp.org)

    Resources for creating a biosecurity plan for your farm are available on the Healthy Farms Healthy Agriculture website Biosecurity Plan – Healthy Farms Healthy Agriculture and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) website Biosecurity – National Dairy FARM Program

    No-tillage and Dry Bean Variety Performance

    Alternative market classes of dry beans, such as navy, small red, and pinto, are valued by consumers for their culinary characteristics and visual appeal. Modern breeding efforts have expanded the market classes (beyond black beans) that can be direct-harvested, lowering the barrier to entry by reducing the need for specialized equipment.

    Current management practices for organic dry beans can deplete the soil, relying on tillage and cultivation for weed management and harvesting. Direct-harvesting dry beans, specifically black beans, has shown promise in organic no-till systems and could reduce the negative impacts on soil health while suppressing weeds.

    In 2023, the University of Vermont Extension Northwest Crops and Soils Program initiated a research trial to evaluate the performance of four dry bean market classes (black, navy, pinto, and small red) in an organic tilled system compared to an organic no till system. Check out the 2023 No-tillage and Dry Bean Variety Performance report to see how these varieties performed under different management systems.

    This research is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) NE SARE under federal award number LNE22-444 and by the USDA NIFA Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) under federal award number 2022-51300-37881.

    Harvest Timing and Height

    It’s almost go time! Be ready for 1st cut to maximize quality.

    The snow has finally left the fields and while the ground is still wet, the first cut will be upon us within a few weeks. While there is always so much to do, take the time to make sure you’re ready to head to the field when the time is right. Timing is everything and as we experienced last year, you just never know when that dry warm stretch is going to arrive.

    With the first cut we are really trying to balance dry matter yield with forage quality, namely fiber digestibility. As cool season grasses mature, they move from leafy vegetative growth to reproductive growth. As they start to elongate, woodier stems grow to support seed heads. These stems contain more fiber, and a higher proportion of that fiber is less digestible. Figure 1 shows this transition in orchardgrass that was harvested weekly starting on 12-May and through 23-May when it began showing seed heads. At the early harvest when the plants were still vegetative, fiber content is low and fiber digestibility is high. As harvest is delayed a week, fiber content increases, in this case by about 2.5%, and fiber digestibility decreased by about 5%. As we reach heading, fiber content is now another 3% higher and fiber digestibility reduced by another 5%. Some research has shown a 0.5 lb milk increase for every 1% increase in fiber digestibility. That means delaying harvest too long can really impact milk production.                                                                 

    Figure 1. Weekly changes in quality of orchardgrass.

    The timing of this transition from vegetative to reproductive stages is going to largely depend on the species and varieties out in the field. Table 1 shows average heading dates we’ve noted in our perennial cool season grass variety trials over the last three years.

    Even if you are running short on feed this spring, resist the temptation to go out and scalp the fields down to the ground! Mowing to the ground removes all the plant leaves but can also remove the plant crown and new side shoots (tillers).  Grasses store energy and new growth potential in their crown and the crown is found in the first 2 to 3 inches of the plant. When this is removed, instead of the plant collecting the sun’s rays to regrow the plant must draw on root energy reserves to elongate those leaves to restart photosynthesis. This takes longer and over time diminishes plant vigor and resilience to drought or other adverse conditions. Repeated low mowing will cause your stands to weaken and thin leading to overall reduced yield, quality, and persistence. While that crown holds energy for the plant, it is actually the least nutritious and digestible portion of the plant. Therefore, while you may be getting a little more tonnage, it is of low quality and increases the risk of soil contamination. This tradeoff is demonstrated in Figure 2 which shows yield and fiber digestibility at three cutting heights. We observed a 7% reduction in yield when cutting at 3.0” vs 1.5” but fiber digestibility increased by 5%.

    Figure 2. Yield vs quality of forage cut at three heights.

    Leaving more stubble in the field has some additional benefits too. Higher stubble can help lift the forage off the ground, allow for better air flow, and faster drying. Faster drying means more plant sugars available to encourage proper fermentation of the feed. More residual protects the soil and helps to maintain cooler ground temperatures. This can help retain moisture and keep the soil microorganisms cool. If the soil gets too hot, these microorganisms slow down or go dormant, limiting the soil’s ability to cycle nutrients and provide other critical functions.

    For all these reasons, take the time to get ready for the first cut and be ready to roll by mid-May. Check over your equipment, install some high skid shoes, and go make some high-quality 1st cut! For more information from our trials, visit our website https://www.uvm.edu/extension/nwcrops/research.

    Skip to toolbar