New study reveals clues for why some treatments are better than others at reducing suicide risk

Why does ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜† (๐—•๐—–๐—•๐—ง) consistently outperform other treatments in preventing suicide attempts?

A new meta-analysis offers a powerful clue: it’s not just the therapyโ€”it’s the way we assess suicide risk.

Across 23 clinical trials, treatments that used a ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜โ€”inviting patients to tell the unfolding story of their suicidal strugglesโ€”were associated with significant reductions in suicide attempts. Treatments that relied on traditional, checklist-style risk interviews did not show the same benefit.

This finding reinforces what many clinicians have observed firsthand: when people feel heard, understood, and empowered to share their lived experience, treatment changes in meaningful ways.

Curious about the full analysis?
๐Ÿ“„ Read it here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2841680

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *