{"id":973,"date":"2017-10-22T09:12:33","date_gmt":"2017-10-22T14:12:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/?page_id=973"},"modified":"2024-05-21T07:39:03","modified_gmt":"2024-05-21T12:39:03","slug":"quickening-urban-pulse","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/research\/india-and-south-asia-research\/urban-pulse\/quickening-urban-pulse\/","title":{"rendered":"Revisioning Urban Pulse"},"content":{"rendered":"

Revisioning Urban Pulse<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pablo Bose<\/p>\n

Department of Geography, University of Vermont<\/em><\/p>\n

The Urban Pulse series was launched under the direction of Helga Leitner in 2008, with a mandate to focus on emerging issues in cities and urban life across the globe (Leitner 2008). Its original goal was to aid in diversifying the field of urban studies, building upon the critique that for too long there has been a disproportionate focus on the same topics and the same places (Sheppard, Gidwani, Goldman, Leitner, Roy, A., and Maringanti 2015; Robinson and Roy 2016; Simone 2020). This is especially true if one thinks about the disproportionate attention paid to many of the major cities in North America and Europe as well as those other sites that often jockey for position within world cities rankings and become aspirational models for urban development. The Urban Pulse series was meant instead to feature geographic locations, themes and authors that might not be quite as over-represented in urban scholarship and to highlight issues both significant and pressing in the life of the modern city.<\/p>\n

The first articles in the series featured primarily emerging and junior scholars, as well as research in and on urbanisms in the Global South and a series of shorter articles (e.g. Karaman 2008; Maringanti 2009; Bunnel and Das 2009; Narsiah 2012; Trumbull 2012; Kanai 2014). Over the course of a dozen years the topics and authors in the series have expanded in terms of their range of subjects and the backgrounds, identities, and career stages of the scholars. I am particularly proud of the depth and breadth of articles that have come out as part of this series during this period, exploring topics including the construction of new cities and aspirational towns in China, Ecuador and Malaysia (Woodworth and Wallace 2017; Lyall 2017; Moser 2018), the deployment of new technologies of surveillance, control and market logics (especially as catalyzed in the midst of a global pandemic) in India and South Africa (Datta, Aditi, Ghoshal, Thomas and Mishra 2021; Odendaal 2021; S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m\u00a02021; Das and Zhang 2021), contestations of space, territory and belonging within diverse urban spaces (Van Lanen 2017; Rosenberg 2017; Mallick 2018; Giddy and Hoogendoorn 2018; Chitti and Moser 2019), new forms of gentrification and transformation in Portugal, Turkey, Brazil and Nepal (Carvalho, Chamusca, Fernandes and Pinto 2019; Hammond 2019; Angeoletto, da Silva Leandro and Fellowes 2019; Ruszczyk 2021), the environmental politics of conservation and disaster recoveries in Thailand, Sri Lanka and Japan (Bicksler 2019; Allen 2019; Cosson 2020), conceptual discussions of postcolonial urbanisms and racial politics (Gerlofs 2019; DeVerteuil 2019; Mordechay 2020) and much more beyond these.<\/p>\n

At the same time, one might argue that the de-centering of Anglo-American issues and locations has become a much more prevalent trend within the various fields of urban scholarship \u2013 and increasingly acknowledged and accepted as a necessary one. This is true within our own journal as it is across others in the discipline; perusing recent issues of Urban Geography <\/em>one finds articles on mixed neighborhoods in Nanjing, displacements in Ethiopia, South Africa and Montreal, informal settlements in Djakarta, urban experimentation in Shenzen and London, alongside Urban Pulse articles on gentrification in Dhaka, Denver, and in the peripheries of African cities. The idea of a series focused primarily on urbanism in the \u2018Global South\u2019 thus seems both irrelevant and outdated. That is not to argue that there is not more to do, particularly to ensure this empirical diversity is married with a conceptual openness (Roy, Wright, Al-Belushi and Bledsoe 2020).<\/p>\n

\n

As the series has created its own profile and prominence, an increasing number of established scholars have also published within it, to its great benefit. But this has raised its own questions regarding the objectives of Urban Pulse. It is no longer a series that primarily features junior or emerging scholars and certainly not only researchers from \u2018the Global South\u2019, another wholly unsatisfactory and deeply problematic set of categories given all we know about the production of such categories, the politics of knowledge production and who gets to claim which identities in which spaces and present themselves as an \u2018authority\u2019 (Moletsane 2015; Haug 2021; Sud and S\u00e1nchez\u2010Ancochea 2022). Indeed, the question of where an author is located seems to have less and less relevance \u2013 even if a majority of the research published in this English-language journal still comes from researchers based in North America and Europe, wherever their field sites might be. Thus, the articles in this series have sometimes overlapped in presentation and style with other sections of the journal \u2013 Debates and Interventions or Special Issues or even regular articles, for example.<\/p>\n

In all these ways, the mandate and mission of the original and evolving Urban Pulse series has increasingly become blurred. In recent years we have described the series as one that focuses on conceptual and emerging issues (rather than the geographic location of topic and the background, or the career stage or nationality of authors) through shorter articles grounded in particular cases. This has helped us to add some outstanding pieces to our collection, but for all the reasons enumerated above, we still feel the time is right to relaunch Urban Pulse with a renewed focus on a new mandate, one that recognizes the evolution of the field and directions of the journal while building on the strengths of the work that we have already published.<\/p>\n

The new vision for Urban Pulse is to be a series that takes the pulse of research on cities, with an opportunity to emphasize and highlight methodological experiments and innovations through short research articles. These should take the form of \u2018research notes\u2019 or \u2018notes from the field\u2019 \u2013 contributions that are beyond a project report, initial findings or a grant proposal but perhaps not as fully developed as a full scholarly article. Urban Pulse submissions could thus be focused on a particular conceptual issue, urban site, or approach that helps to demystify research in and on cities. We are particularly interested in grounded research and approaches, as well as in creative methods \u2013 while we will continue to publish Urban Pulse articles within the print journal, we are also open to utilizing diverse forms of dissemination \u2013 including photo essays, video diaries, reflections on research processes, and other means to illuminate and interrogate research on the city. Community-based projects and interventions, the development of new tools and methods, or the reappraisal of existing orthodoxies would all be appropriate for the new series.<\/p>\n

For examples of what we are particularly interested in, essays published in the second half of 2022 are a good guide, as we have begun to transition to this new vision. These include Weijie Hu\u2019s exploration of hukou reform in Chongqing with a focus on migrant worker perspectives (Hu 2022), Sergei Basik\u2019s discussion of place-making and popular resistance to autocracy in Minsk (Basik 2022), Stephanie Wakefield, Sarah Molinari and Kevin Grove\u2019s exploration of pandemic-catalyzed cryptocurrency urban governance in Miami (Wakefield, Molinari and Grove 2022), Albert Orta Mascaro\u2019s analysis of the contested nature of Madrid\u2019s positioning as a global city region (Mascar\u00f3 2022), and Monika Streule\u2019s examination of urban extractivism and megaprojects in Mexico City (Streule 2022). Accompanying this editorial, we present five more essays in the Urban Pulse series that further exemplify our focus on research-in-progress.<\/p>\n

In \u201cDisplaced for housing: analyzing the uneven outcomes of the Addis Ababa Integrated Housing Development Program\u201d Fikir Haile explores a government-led attempt to address severe housing shortages in the Ethiopian capital (Haile 2023, this issue). She argues that while this initiative has indeed profoundly reshaped the landscape of the metropolitan area, as in many other similar cases, inequality has deepened and delivered poor outcomes for the most marginalized of local populations. Hsi-Chuan Wang takes a comparative lens to his examination in \u201cCultural variables differ: informal settlement interventions in Accra and Buenos Aires\u201d (Wang 2023, this issue), arguing that contextual factors and cultural variables are crucial for understanding how perspectives on informal urban growth may appear so distinct. Perspectives and assumptions are also at the center of the contribution offered by Mohammad Feisal Rahman, David Lewis, Laura Kuhl, Andrew Baldwin, Hanna Ruszczyk, Md Nadiruzzaman and Yousuf Mahid, \u201cManaged urban retreat: the trouble with crisis narratives\u201d (Rahman et al. 2023, this issue). They take to task many of the most significant cultural anxieties \u2013 popular, scholarly, and policy-level \u2013 regarding climate change and forced migration and critique the notion that such displacement (potential or actual) can be effectively \u2018managed\u2019. Robbin Jan van Duijne is also interested in migration dynamics in \u201cInjected urbanism: urban theory from India\u201d(van Duijne 2023, this issue). In this article, he explores the emerging context of rural-urban migration, labor migration and urban growth centers in India, and offers a schema for best understanding the complexities and nuances of the changes that the country is currently undergoing. Finally, in Max Woodworth\u2019s \u201cFreedom cities: Trump and an American new global city,\u201d the author looks at the former US president\u2019s campaign promise to build ten new cities on federally owned land (Woodworth 2023, this issue). The purpose is ostensibly to bypass the struggles and supposed breakdowns of existing (primarily Democratic-led) urban centers and build homages to an imagined American glory of the past in a manner that Woodworth argues provides an insight into a contemporary moment of far-right nostalgia fused with particular forms of urban developmentalism.<\/p>\n

We look forward to adding more work of this nature to our series. We would thus encourage contributors to submit short essays (up to 3000 words in length, following Urban Geography<\/em>\u2019s instructions to authors). Given the scope of the series and to ensure a proper fit with our new direction, please send your ideas for possible contributions in the first instances to the series editor (as opposed to submitting essays directly via the journal\u2019s on-line portal) to: Pablo Bose, Department of Geography, University of Vermont (e-mail: pbose@uvm.edu<\/a>).<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

AbdouMaliq Simone. (2020). Cities of the global South.\u00a0Annual review of Sociology\u00a046: 603-622.<\/p>\n

Albert Orta\u00a0Mascar\u00f3\u00a0(2022)\u00a0The geopolitical construction of Madrid as a city-region and its discontents: understanding the relevance of the \u201cnational\u201d scale for the urban process,\u00a0Urban Geography,43:10,\u00a01572-1579,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2022.2133297<\/a><\/p>\n

Anant\u00a0Maringanti\u00a0(2009)\u00a0Urban Pulse\u2014Urbanizing Microfinance: Examples from India,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a030:7,\u00a0685-693,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.30.7.685<\/a><\/p>\n

Ananya\u00a0Roy,\u00a0Willie J.\u00a0Wright,\u00a0Yousuf\u00a0Al-Bulushi\u00a0&\u00a0Adam\u00a0Bledsoe\u00a0(2020)\u00a0\u2018A world of many Souths\u2019: (anti)Blackness and historical difference in conversation with Ananya Roy,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a041:6,920-935,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1807164<\/a><\/p>\n

Angus\u00a0Lyall\u00a0(2017)\u00a0Voluntary resettlement in land grab contexts: examining consent on the Ecuadorian oil frontier,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a038:7,\u00a0958-973,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2016.1235933<\/a> Marco\u00a0Chitti\u00a0&\u00a0Sarah\u00a0Moser\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Emerging trends in urbanizing Palestine: neglected city-builders beyond the occupation,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:7,\u00a01010-1017,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1596706<\/a><\/p>\n

Ayona\u00a0Datta,\u00a0Anwesha\u00a0Aditi,\u00a0Arunima\u00a0Ghoshal,\u00a0Arya\u00a0Thomas\u00a0&\u00a0Yogesh\u00a0Mishra\u00a0(2021)\u00a0Apps, maps and war rooms: on the modes of existence of \u201cCOVtech\u201d in India,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a042:3,\u00a0382-390,DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1807165<\/a><\/p>\n

Ayyaz\u00a0Mallick\u00a0(2018)\u00a0Urban space and (the limits of) middle class hegemony in Pakistan,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a039:7,\u00a01113-1120,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2018.1439555<\/a><\/p>\n

Ben A.\u00a0Gerlofs\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Policing perception: postpolitics and the elusive everyday,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:3,\u00a0378-386,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2018.1558633<\/a><\/p>\n

Camille\u00a0Cosson\u00a0(2020)\u00a0From a tsunami-devastated zone to an attractive fishing town: a study on Onagawa\u2019s strategy for a prompt recovery,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a041:5,\u00a0777-790,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1780054<\/a><\/p>\n

Diganta\u00a0Das\u00a0&\u00a0J. J.\u00a0Zhang\u00a0(2021)\u00a0Pandemic in a smart city: Singapore\u2019s COVID-19 management through technology & society,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a042:3,\u00a0408-416,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1807168<\/a><\/p>\n

Fabio\u00a0Angeoletto,\u00a0Deleon da Silva\u00a0Leandro\u00a0&\u00a0Mark D. E.\u00a0Fellowes\u00a0(2019)\u00a0The consequences of Brazil\u2019s lack of transport planning is written in the blood of sparrows,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:8,\u00a01191-1197,DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1653135<\/a><\/p>\n

Fikir\u00a0Haile\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Displaced for housing: analysing the uneven outcomes of the Addis Ababa Integrated Housing Development Program,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2023.2227511<\/a><\/p>\n

Geoff\u00a0DeVerteuil\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Post-revanchist cities?,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:7,\u00a01055-1061,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1640034<\/a><\/p>\n

Hanna A.\u00a0Ruszczyk\u00a0(2021)\u00a0Newly urban Nepal,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a042:2,\u00a0218-225,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1756683<\/a><\/p>\n

Helga\u00a0Leitner\u00a0(2008)\u00a0New Series Announcement\u2014Urban Pulse: Emerging Issues in Cities and Urban Life,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a029:6,\u00a0517,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.29.6.517<\/a><\/p>\n

Hsi-Chuan\u00a0Wang\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Cultural variables differ informal settlement interventions in Accra and Buenos Aires,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2023.2234248<\/a><\/p>\n

Jennifer Robinson and Ananya Roy. (2016). Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory.\u00a0International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,\u00a040(1), 181-186.<\/p>\n

Julia Kathryn\u00a0Giddy\u00a0&\u00a0Gijsbert\u00a0Hoogendoorn\u00a0(2018)\u00a0Ethical concerns around inner city walking tours,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a039:9,\u00a01293-1299,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2018.1446884<\/a><\/p>\n

Kfir\u00a0Mordechay\u00a0(2020)\u00a0Race, space, and America\u2019s subprime housing boom,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a041:6,\u00a0936-946,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1757860<\/a><\/p>\n

Lu\u00eds\u00a0Carvalho,\u00a0Pedro\u00a0Chamusca,\u00a0Jos\u00e9\u00a0Fernandes\u00a0&\u00a0Jorge\u00a0Pinto\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Gentrification in Porto: floating city users and internationally-driven urban change,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:4,\u00a0565-572,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1585139<\/a><\/p>\n

M.Feisal\u00a0Rahman,\u00a0David\u00a0Lewis,\u00a0Laura\u00a0Kuhl,\u00a0Andrew\u00a0Baldwin,\u00a0Hanna\u00a0Ruszczyk,\u00a0Md.\u00a0Nadiruzzaman\u00a0&\u00a0Yousuf\u00a0Mahid\u00a0(2023)Managed urban retreat: the trouble with crisis narratives,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2023.2228094<\/a><\/p>\n

Max D.\u00a0Woodworth\u00a0(2023)\u00a0\u201cFreedom Cities\u201d: Trump and an American global new city,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2023.2263121<\/a><\/p>\n

Max D.\u00a0Woodworth\u00a0&\u00a0Jeremy L.\u00a0Wallace\u00a0(2017)\u00a0Seeing ghosts: parsing China\u2019s \u201cghost city\u201d controversy,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a038:8,\u00a01270-1281,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2017.1288009<\/a><\/p>\n

Miguel\u00a0Kanai\u00a0(2014)\u00a0Buenos Aires, capital of tango: tourism, redevelopment and the cultural politics of neoliberal urbanism,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a035:8,\u00a01111-1117,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2014.957112<\/a><\/p>\n

Monika\u00a0Streule\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Urban extractivism. Contesting megaprojects in Mexico City, rethinking urban values,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a044:1,\u00a0262-271,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2022.2146931<\/a><\/p>\n

Nathaniel\u00a0S.\u00a0Trumbull\u00a0(2012)\u00a0Urban Pulse\u2014Claiming “The Right to the City”: Architectural Preservation in St. Petersburg as Cultural and Political Catalyst,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a033:7,\u00a01000-1007,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.33.7.1000<\/a><\/p>\n

Nikita Sud and Diego S\u00e1nchez\u2010Ancochea (2022). Southern discomfort: interrogating the category of the global south.\u00a0Development and Change\u00a053(6): 1123-1150.<\/p>\n

Ola\u00a0S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m\u00a0(2021)\u00a0The three modes of existence of the pandemic smart city,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a042:3,\u00a0399-407,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2020.1807167<\/a><\/p>\n

Ozan\u00a0Karaman\u00a0(2008)\u00a0Urban Pulse\u2014(RE)Making Space for Globalization in Istanbul,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a029:6,\u00a0518-525,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.29.6.518<\/a><\/p>\n

Rae\u00a0Rosenberg\u00a0(2017)\u00a0The whiteness of gay urban belonging: criminalizing LGBTQ youth of color in queer spaces of care,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a038:1,\u00a0137-148,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2016.1239498<\/a><\/p>\n

Rebecca\u00a0Bicksler\u00a0(2019)\u00a0The role of heritage conservation in disaster mitigation: a conceptual framework for connecting heritage and flood management in Chiang Mai, Thailand,\u00a0Urban Geography,40:2,\u00a0257-265,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2018.1534568<\/a><\/p>\n

Reheboleh Moletsane. (2015) Whose knowledge is it? Towards reordering knowledge production and dissemination in the Global South. Education Research for Social Change 4(2): 35-47.<\/p>\n

Robbin Jan\u00a0van Duijne\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Injected urbanism: urban theory from India?,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2023.2253112<\/a><\/p>\n

Sagie\u00a0Narsiah\u00a0(2011)\u00a0Urban Pulse\u2014The Struggle for Water, Life, and Dignity In South African Cities: The Case of Johannesburg,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a032:2,\u00a0149-155,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.32.2.149<\/a><\/p>\n

Sander\u00a0van Lanen\u00a0(2017)\u00a0Living austerity urbanism: space\u2013time expansion and deepening socio-spatial inequalities for disadvantaged urban youth in Ireland,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a038:10,\u00a01603-1613,DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2017.1349989<\/a><\/p>\n

Sarah\u00a0Allen\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Water scarce or water abundant? The case of Can Tho, Vietnam,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:7,\u00a01030-1038,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1617009<\/a><\/p>\n

Sarah\u00a0Moser\u00a0(2018)\u00a0Forest city, Malaysia, and Chinese expansionism,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a039:6,\u00a0935-943,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2017.1405691<\/a><\/p>\n

Sebastian\u00a0Haug\u00a0(2021)\u00a0A Thirdspace approach to the \u2018Global South\u2019: insights from the margins of a popular category,Third World Quarterly,\u00a042:9,\u00a02018-2038,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/01436597.2020.1712999<\/a><\/p>\n

Sergei\u00a0Basik\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Vernacular place name as a cultural arena of urban place-making and symbolic resistance in Minsk, Belarus,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a044:8,\u00a01825-1832,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2022.2125666<\/a><\/p>\n

Sheppard, Eric, Vinay Gidwani, Michael Goldman, Helga Leitner, Ananya Roy, and Anant Maringanti. (2015). Introduction: Urban revolutions in the age of global urbanism.\u00a0Urban Studies\u00a052(11): 1947-1961.<\/p>\n

Stephanie\u00a0Wakefield,\u00a0Sarah\u00a0Molinari\u00a0&\u00a0Kevin\u00a0Grove\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Crypto-urban statecraft: post-pandemic urban governance experiments in Miami,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a044:8,\u00a01816-1824,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2022.2125664<\/a><\/p>\n

Tim\u00a0Bunnell\u00a0&\u00a0Diganta\u00a0Das\u00a0(2010)\u00a0Urban Pulse\u2014A Geography of Serial Seduction: Urban Policy Transfer from Kuala Lumpur to Hyderabad,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a031:3,\u00a0277-284,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.2747\/0272-3638.31.3.277<\/a><\/p>\n

Timur\u00a0Hammond\u00a0(2019)\u00a0The politics of perspective: subjects, exhibits, and spectacle in Taksim Square, Istanbul,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a040:7,\u00a01039-1054,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2019.1640033<\/a><\/p>\n

Weijie\u00a0Hu\u00a0(2023)\u00a0Why did Chongqing\u2019s recent\u00a0hukou<\/em>\u00a0reform fail? A Chinese migrant workers\u2019 perspective,\u00a0Urban Geography,\u00a044:8,\u00a01833-1842,\u00a0DOI:\u00a010.1080\/02723638.2022.2125667<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Revisioning Urban Pulse Pablo Bose Department of Geography, University of Vermont The Urban Pulse series was launched under the direction of Helga Leitner in 2008, with a mandate to focus on emerging issues in cities and urban life across the globe (Leitner 2008). Its original goal was to aid in diversifying the field of urban … Continue reading Revisioning Urban Pulse<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":360,"featured_media":0,"parent":841,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-973","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/360"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=973"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/973\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1140,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/973\/revisions\/1140"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/pbose\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}