1-30-20 visit

Wildlife Activity

Although we didn’t see any animal activity first-hand we did find tracks that indicated that there were still active animals in the area. With the help of our tracking guide, we were able to make predictions as to what kind of species left the prints. More tracking information follows:

Winter Twig Identification

For twig identification, we thought that they were either Norway Maple or Red Maple twigs. We came to this conclusion based on the large terminal bud on the twig; Norway Maples have larger terminal buds than Red Maples but both are similarly shaped. The buds were also red which aligns with Normary and Red Maple descriptions.

Sketched Twig Labeled

Legend:
Arrow: bud scar
Smile: lateral bud
Star: terminal bud

Phenological Changes

Some of the most evident changes in the site were observed within the stream. In particular, the width of the stream seemed to be much thinner than our last visit and as a result, some areas of the stream appeared deeper. Along the edges of the water there was some ice but it wasn’t thick enough to support our standing on it and there was still some running water beneath it. Where there were large rocks surfaced throughout the stream there was also ice surrounding them. In terms of vegetation, the area is quite barren with just a couple hemlocks scattered around the banks. In addition, the main fallen tree still had moss on it despite being snow-covered. The running water and the presence of rocks and twigs within the stream created really interesting and intricate icicles.

Field Notes

Citations

All photos were taken by me and Sofia Vallecillo

Tracking Information: “Mammal Tracks and Scat: Life-Size Pocket Guide”