{"id":241,"date":"2008-01-22T08:43:26","date_gmt":"2008-01-22T12:43:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/2008\/01\/22\/better-blog-comments-or-peer-review\/"},"modified":"2008-01-22T08:43:26","modified_gmt":"2008-01-22T12:43:26","slug":"better-blog-comments-or-peer-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/2008\/01\/22\/better-blog-comments-or-peer-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Better: Blog Comments or Peer Review?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jeffrey Young asks &#8220;What if scholarly books were peer reviewed by anonymous blog comments rather than by traditional, selected peer reviewers?&#8221;<br \/>\nAnd continues:<br \/>\n&#8220;That&#8217;s the question being posed by an unusual experiment that begins today. It involves a scholar studying video games, a popular academic blog with the playful name Grand Text Auto, a nonprofit group designing blog tools for scholars, and MIT Press.&#8221;<br \/>\nThe article is in today&#8217;s Chronicle of Higher Ed, titled &#8220;Blog Comments and Peer Review Go Head to Head to See Which Makes a Book Better.&#8221; The book to be reviewed is &#8220;Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies&#8221; by Noah Wardrip-Fruin, an assistant professor of communication at the University of California at San Diego.<br \/>\nMr. Wardrip-Fruin and several colleagues also fun the blog &#8220;Grand Text Auto.&#8221; The blog offers an academic take on interactive fiction and video games, and is read by academics, readers from the video-game industry and video-game players. The plan is to publish parts of the book on the blog and request comments. The publisher, MIT Press, will, simultaneously, have the book peer-reviewed in the traditional way, allowing for &#8220;side-by-side comparison of<br \/>\nreviewing old school versus new blog. Mr. Wardrip-Fruin calls the<br \/>\nnew method &#8216;blog-based peer review.'&#8221;<br \/>\nComplete article at:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/free\/2008\/01\/1322n.htm\">http:\/\/chronicle.com\/free\/2008\/01\/1322n.htm<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jeffrey Young asks &#8220;What if scholarly books were peer reviewed by anonymous blog comments rather than by traditional, selected peer reviewers?&#8221; And continues: &#8220;That&#8217;s the question being posed by an unusual experiment that begins today. It involves a scholar studying &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/2008\/01\/22\/better-blog-comments-or-peer-review\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6870],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-inspiration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/ctl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}