Expanding Ranges: Beavers’ Effects on New Ecosystems

Scientists today understand the ecological significance of beavers (Castor canadensis or Castor fiber), calling them “ecosystem engineers” because of the widespread impacts of their dams. Before their place in the ecosystems was known, beavers were eradicated from many parts of their historical range. This range included North America, Asia, and Europe, but overhunting led to drastic decreases in their numbers. Now that their importance is understood, beaver reintroduction has been initiated in many parts of their historical range as a method of stream conservation. (Brazier et al., 2020). However, beaver relocation is not always beneficial to the areas’ ecosystems. Whether due to changes in climate or human introduction, beavers can have drastic impacts on stream characteristics.

As the climate changes, beavers are beginning to naturally relocate to areas past their recent historical range. Beavers were overharvested almost to expiration by fur trappers in Alaska (19th – early 20th century). However, even during this time, they were constrained by tundra regions. It is widely believed that the cold temperatures further in the north froze open water, preventing beavers from establishing until recently when temperatures are rising. However, another theory suggests that beavers were present in the tundra in the past, but have not yet returned because historical hunting was so detrimental to their populations.

Whatever the case for their historical absence may be, beavers are beginning to move further into the tundra area. Due to warming air temperatures, the Arctic has had earlier snowmelt and increased warming of the permafrost (ground that is frozen around the year). These effects have been particularly noticeable in streams in particular. When the permafrost melts, it releases sediment and nutrients stored within. It can also release stored gases into the atmosphere, contributing to the changing climate. Melting ice can also break off and move through the water, exposing the stream bank. This encourages growth on the bank and can lead to an overall increase in photosynthesis.(Sturm et al., 2001).

Estimated map of beaver expansion past the tree line (orange line) in Alaskan and Canadian tundra. (Tape et al., 2018).

While changing climate may be the reason for beavers’ range expansion, this expansion also impacts the environment in return. As widely known “eco-system engineers”, this expansion was predicted to strongly impact tundra freshwater ecosystems.

Beaver activity can destabilize arctic streams. As they create dams, they create dynamic wetland ecosystems from these previously stable streams. These changes in the physical characteristics of streams diversify habitat. This can provide ideal conditions for non-native species to expand their own ranges. For example, beaver dams can increase water and sediment temperature downstream. Higher temperatures can improve the survival of fish eggs that are incubating in the sand The effects of these newly colonizing species are yet to be determined (Tape et al., 2018).

A beaver in the snow. (Lockhart, 2024).

In contrast, non-native beavers (Castor canadensis) in Cape Horn, Chile have reduced diversity in streams. In streams invaded by beavers, benthic macroinvertebrate communities were more uniform. Despite this decrease in diversity, the streams became more productive overall. While there were fewer taxa present, the abundance and levels of secondary production greatly increased. Temperatures downstream of the dams were also increased. These results contrasted with what was expected, as species diversity generally increases as habitat diversity increases. The contrasting results observed in Chile were proposed to be a result of increased substrate. While building dams, the beavers may have increased levels of substrate and organic matter on the stream bed, filling spaces where smaller taxa may live. By making the habitat below the streams more uniform, the invasive beavers caused a decrease in biodiversity despite increased productivity (Anderson & Rosemond, 2006).

Whether intentionally introduced or not, the expansion of beaver ranges into new areas can have widespread impacts on stream ecosystems. Beaver habits that are essential to their native ecosystems can have different results in different biomes. As the climate continues to change, beavers may continue to expand their range and may have unprecedented effects. Beaver ranges should be monitored continuously to manage detrimental effects on new ecosystems before irreversible damage is done.

References

Anderson, Christopher B., and Amy D. Rosemond. 2007. “Ecosystem Engineering by Invasive Exotic Beavers Reduces In-Stream Diversity and Enhances Ecosystem Function in Cape Horn, Chile.” Oecologia 154: 141–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0757-4.

Brazier, Richard E., Alan Puttock, Hugh A. Graham, Roger E. Auster, Kye H. Davies, and Chryssa M. Brown. 2020. “Beaver: Nature’s Ecosystem Engineers.” WIREs Water 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1494.

Lockheart, Neil. A beaver sits on a snowy riverbank. 2024. Photograph.

Sturm, Matthew, Charles Racine, and Kenneth Tape. 2001. “Increasing Shrub Abundance in the Arctic.” Nature 411: 546–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079180.

Tape, Ken D., Benjamin M. Jones, Christopher D. Arp, Ingmar Nitze, and Guido Grosse. 2018. “Tundra Be Dammed: Beaver Colonization of the Arctic.” Global Change Biology 24: 4478–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14332.

Challenges and Benefits of Beaver Reintroduction

Beavers are remarkable animals who transform ecosystems to suit their needs. In doing this, they also create valuable habitats for many other species. They do this by building dams, which create ponds filled with sediment, nutrients, plants, and wildlife. These dams slow down water flow, reducing flooding downstream and storing water during droughts.

A beaver collecting materials for a dam. (WildlifeNYC, 2024).

Beavers also dig canals across floodplains to find food and materials, which helps connect different parts of the landscape. By cutting trees close to the ground to encourage new growth, beavers create habitat for insects, birds, and other animals. 

In the past, beavers were common in Europe, Asia, and North America. They played an important role in managing water and supporting freshwater ecosystems. Around 400 years ago, they were hunted extensively and disappeared from some areas, like Great Britain. Now, efforts are being made to reintroduce them to their former habitats. 

Understanding the impact of beavers is essential, especially in landscapes that have been heavily impacted by human activities like farming and urban development. This study examines how beavers affect ecosystems, water flow, water quality, freshwater life, and human interactions. 

Beavers dig burrows along riverbanks and create networks of shallow channels, known as canals, which affect the distribution of water and the surface of the landscape. As beavers loosen soils from river banks, they can cause sediments to move, which can lead to the collapse of nearby structures like flood embankments. 

A beaver dam. (Sowl, 2024).

These beaver constructions also have a huge impact on water flow and storage. Beaver dams affect how water moves both locally and downstream. Their activity slows down water flow, which can flood nearby areas and create wetlands. These wetlands store water and recharge groundwater, helping during dry periods. Additionally, these wetlands provide habitats for many aquatic species. 

 Beaver dams also hold back sediment and nutrients, which can improve water quality by reducing pollution downstream. They act like filters, trapping particles and chemicals. Additionally, beaver ponds provide habitats for plants and animals, further enhancing water quality. Overall, beavers play a crucial role in shaping freshwater ecosystems and improving water quality by slowing down water, trapping sediment and nutrients, and creating diverse habitats.

Additionally, beavers increase the presence of woody debris in rivers, such as fallen trees, branches, and logs. This creates sheltered areas which act as habitats for many organisms, such as fish, insects, and amphibians. By building dams, beavers create a variety of homes for many species. Their activities lead to more aquatic plants, invertebrates, and fish, increasing biodiversity. Beaver dams create habitat patches, which are distinct areas in an ecosystem that have different characteristics. These habitat patches support fish growth, survival, and diversity. 

Diagram of beavers’ interactions with other species as a keystone species. (Rewilding Europe, 2022).

Beavers have many benefits on aquatic ecosystems, but reintroducing beavers into habitats may pose challenges. Conflicts may occur between beavers and humans, especially in areas where beaver activities interfere with human interests, such as agriculture and forestry. In order to effectively manage beaver populations and reintroduction conflicts, it is important to engage with any affected individuals to involve them in decision making processes. There are management strategies which can address conflicts, including dam removal, stabilizing riverbanks, and installing flow devices to control water levels.  Overall, while reintroducing beavers can bring significant environmental benefits, effective management and collaboration between stakeholders are essential to address conflicts and maximize the positive impacts of beavers on ecosystems and society.

Specifically in Vermont, reintroducing beavers may have various ecological and environmental impacts, both positive and potentially challenging ones. Beavers are considered a keystone species because their activities create and maintain habitats that benefit a wide range of other species. Reintroducing them could enhance biodiversity by creating wetlands that support diverse plant and animal communities. Though beaver dams help improve water quality, these constructions could also lead to a higher risk of flooding, which would need to be managed to minimize conflicts with human activities. This is especially concerning with global warming trends, as Vermont is prone to more extreme precipitation events with increasing temperatures. Beavers would need to be carefully reintroduced to suitable habitats, such as areas with slow-moving streams, ponds, or wetlands. Any reintroduction efforts would need to be monitored to see how successful this project is and foresee any issues that might arise. It’s important to have a long-term plan for managing beaver populations and their impacts.

A beaver swimming. (Howard, 2024).

References

Brazier, Richard E., Alan Puttock, Hugh A. Graham, Roger E. Auster, Kye H. Davies, and Chryssa M. Brown. 2020. “Beaver: Nature’s Ecosystem Engineers.” WIREs Water (8):1. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1494.

Howard, Madalen. 2024. Swimming Beaver. Photograph

Sowl, Kristine. 2024. Beaver Dam. Photograph.

Rewilding Europe. 2022. The Beaver: A Keystone Species. Photograph.

How do beavers affect fish communities in streams?

Beavers (Castor fiber or Castor canadensis) can have widespread impacts on ecosystems due to their life history habits. They are commonly known as an “ecosystem engineer” species and can modify stream aquatic ecosystems drastically while meeting their own needs. Through habits such as felling trees to digging canals, beavers can change the abiotic, or non-living, components of these aquatic ecosystems (Brazier et al., 2020).

Beaver-induced changes can alter the shape, speed, and sediment distribution within a stream (Naiman et al., 1986) These changes in abiotic components of stream ecosystems can, in turn, affect the biotic, or living, components, such as fish communities. For example, fish species richness and population health can be related to stream features such as depth and level of structure (Lonzarich & Quinn, 1995).  

Changes in the appearance of Maggie Creek, Nevada following stream restoration efforts including the reintroduction of beavers (NRDC, 2024)

This post will summarize and examine the impacts of beaver ecosystem modifications on fish communities as found in the study “Effects of beaver dams on the fish fauna of forest streams” by Åsa Hägglund and Göran Sjöberg.

Streams in Sweden were sampled to understand what impacts beavers may have had. Beavers were once extinct in Sweden due to hunting and demand for beaver pelts. Beavers from Norwegian populations were reintroduced to Sweden from 1922 to 1939. The reintroduction was highly successful, and by 1992, there were about 1992 beavers throughout the country (Hartman, 1995). These unprecedented changes in the abundance of such an influential species had widespread effects on other species.

Beavers’ effects on five fish species were evaluated. The species were minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus), brown trout (Salmo trutta), bullhead (Cottus gobio), burbot (Lota lota), and pike (Esox Lucius). A total of seven streams were sampled using electrofishing. The majority of streams sampled were second-order, though one third-order and one fourth-order stream were included. The stream areas were divided into categories based on their proximity to beaver ponds. The categories were riffles upstream of a beaver pond, a beaver pond (including the dam), and a riffle downstream of the pond. In addition to these categories, “reference” sections, or areas further from beaver ponds. The streams were sampled three times in a span of four months, except for the fourth-order stream, which was sampled only twice. The species were minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus), brown trout (Salmo trutta), bullhead (Cottus gobio), burbot (Lota lota), and pike (Esox Lucius). Each individual caught was measured for length. Larger, lentic species, specifically Brown Trout were predicted to be more frequently found in the beaver ponds while lotic species were predicted to be more frequently found in the riffles.

The most fish were collected in the reference sections (281 fish) followed by beaver pond sections (242 fish) and downstream riffles (107 fish). The least fish were collected in upstream riffles (60 fish). The majority of fish collected were minnows (417 fish). Brown trout were the second most collected, (249 fish), while burbot were collected the least (1 fish).

These results supported the hypothesis that lentic fish overall would be found more frequently in beaver ponds. However, the prediction that brown trout would follow this pattern was not supported, as they were found more frequently in riffle patterns. The authors suggested that this may be due to changes in trout feeding patterns over their life cycle, with younger trout using faster-moving stream sections more frequently than ponds (Alexander & Hansen, 1983). This suggestion was supported by the results because larger trout individuals were collected in the pond areas.

Brown trout in a stream habitat. (The Guardian, 2019)

The study concluded that beaver habits such as creating dams can increase species diversity in streams overall due to an increase in habitat diversity. Dams can act as a barrier against fish migration, though the actual observed effect of this can vary based on the dispersal habits of the species.

However, as the title of the study suggests, it is not a comprehensive study. Based on the specificity of the focus streams, caution is advised before applying these results to other locations.

Only boreal, coniferous forest streams were studied. Additionally, only Swedish streams were studied, which the authors noted may impact the results because Sweden is species-poor compared to areas such as North America. These results should be compared to the findings of similar studies in other regions to understand how regional species composition and diversity may impact beaver-fish interactions.

A coniferous stream in Sweden (Countryboard of Gävleborg, 2022).

References

“Country Diary: Beneath the Gin-Clear Waters of the Test.” 1995. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/04/country-diary-trout-beneath-the-gin-clear-waters-of-the-river-test.

Hartman, Göran. 1995. “Patterns of Spread of a Reintroduced BeaverCastor Fiberpopulation in Sweden.” Wildlife Biology 1 (1): 97–103. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.1995.0015.

Naiman, Robert J., Jerry M. Melillo, and John E. Hobbie. 1986. “Ecosystem Alteration of Boreal Forest Streams by Beaver (Castor Canadensis).” Ecology 67 (5): 1254–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938681.

Sherry, Jennifer, and Minah Choi. 2021. “How the Eager Beaver Helps Protect the Planet.” NRDC. https://www.nrdc.org/bio/jennifer-sherry/how-eager-beaver-helps-protect-planet.

“Sweden’s Rivers Get a New Lease of Life.” 2022. European Climate, Infrastructure, and Environment Executive Agency. https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/swedens-rivers-get-new-lease-life-2022-11-18_en.