{"id":8777,"date":"2016-05-31T11:09:19","date_gmt":"2016-05-31T16:09:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/?p=8777"},"modified":"2019-09-16T18:07:59","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T23:07:59","slug":"interview-autobio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2016\/05\/31\/interview-autobio\/","title":{"rendered":"Interview &amp; autobio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Interviews are funny things: you have to think on the spot, but later realize how deeply and profoundly imperfect (!) was your choice of words.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/post-traditional-buddhism\">Imperfect Buddha Podcast<\/a> has an <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/imperfect-buddha-podcast\/72-imperfect-buddha-podcast-adrian-ivakhiv-on-immanence\">interview with me<\/a> in which host Matthew O&#8217;Connor (of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/posttraditionalbuddhism.com\/\">Post-Traditional Buddhism<\/a>) and I talk at length about Buddhism, process-relational metaphysics, panpsychism, social constructionism, cognitive science, meditation (including process-relational analytic meditation, but much\u00a0later than when he asks me about it), emptiness, subjectivity, Dzogchen, enlightenment, and ecological crisis, plus\u00a0a host of thinkers from Whitehead and Peirce to Naess, Guattari, Harman, Zizek, Lacan, and meditation teacher Shinzen Young.<\/p>\n<p>Writing, on the other hand, allows for the kind of reflective consideration of one&#8217;s words that I&#8217;m more accustomed to.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/journals.equinoxpub.com\/index.php\/POM\">The Pomegranate<\/a>, a peer-reviewed journal of Pagan studies, has published a special issue incorporating autobiographies of some scholarly leaders\u00a0within that field, and it turns out that I qualify among them. (I&#8217;ve been on the editorial board of the journal for many years.)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>One of the things I\u00a0discuss\u00a0in <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.equinoxpub.com\/index.php\/POM\/article\/view\/29680\">my piece<\/a>\u00a0there is the &#8220;tension of the upper versus lower case &#8220;p&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8220;Is P\/paganism a religion among other religions, or is it something else, such as a sensibility, an approach to the world, a philosophical mindset, or even a way of conceiving of religion that is more encompassing than others? There is certainly value for Pagans to have their religious beliefs and practices recognized as such. But I believe there is also value in making a case for an earth-honoring spirituality that encompasses philosophy, science, artistic practice, and more, and that infuses many &#8220;religions&#8221; in diverse ways &#8212; something that they forget to their detriment. In this latter sense, paganism may be something to be rediscovered within the manifold practices by which humans experience value, agency, and mystery in (and beyond) the world around them.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The entire article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/25740448\/Pagan_ish_Senses_and_Sensibilities\">can be read here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Interviews are funny things: you have to think on the spot, but later realize how deeply and profoundly imperfect (!) was your choice of words. The Imperfect Buddha Podcast has an interview with me in which host Matthew O&#8217;Connor (of\u00a0Post-Traditional Buddhism) and I talk at length about Buddhism, process-relational metaphysics, panpsychism, social constructionism, cognitive science, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4422,691847],"tags":[350268,350239,4417,4418,38462,376,16839,350250,4416,16870,350248,417,16840,16875,423,377],"class_list":["post-8777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-process-relational-thought","category-religion-spirituality","tag-adrian-ivakhiv","tag-autobiography","tag-buddhism","tag-dzogchen","tag-interviews","tag-lacan","tag-meditation","tag-pagan-studies","tag-paganism","tag-peirce","tag-post-traditional-buddhism","tag-religion","tag-shinzen-young","tag-spirituality","tag-whitehead","tag-zizek"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-2hz","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6236,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2012\/12\/11\/zizek-v-buddhism-whos-the-subject\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":0},"title":"Zizek v. Buddhism: who&#8217;s the subject?","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"December 11, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"This started out as a response to Slavoj Zizek's recent talk here at the University of Vermont on \"Buddhism Naturalized,\" but evolved into a consideration of subjectivity, which happened to be the topic of my next post in the pre-G (process-relational ecosophy-G) series. So this can be considered part 1\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1366,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/11\/05\/process-relational-theory-primer\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":1},"title":"Process-relational theory primer","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"November 5, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"One of the tasks of this blog, since its inception in late 2008, has been to articulate a theoretical-philosophical perspective that I have come to call \u201cprocess-relational.\u201d This is a theoretical paradigm and an ontology that takes the basic nature of the world to be that of relational process: that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-theory&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1014,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2008\/12\/14\/rigpa-meets-anima\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":2},"title":"rigpa meets anima&#8230;","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"December 14, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Rigpa is the state of compassionate awareness that, according to Mahayana Buddhism, is the innermost nature of the mind. It is the primordial, nondual mind that shines through when unobscured; intelligent, cognizant, awake. \"Empty in essence, cognizant in nature, unconfined in capacity.\" Recognizing and dwelling within rigpa is the goal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-theory&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13090,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2023\/01\/06\/zizeks-belated-reply\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":3},"title":"\u017di\u017eek&#8217;s belated reply","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"January 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Slavoj \u017di\u017eek has \"belatedly\" replied, in The Philosophical Salon, to some things I wrote in 2009 about his Lacanianism and his understanding (some would say misunderstanding) of Buddhism, and to other critiques of the latter. In his reply, he later mistakes another author -- of the blog And Now For\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spirit matter&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spirit matter","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/religion-spirituality\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2023\/01\/c7fabf9bedd0226bc5a75ba8dee670f4_230__2.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4135,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/05\/24\/process-integralism\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":4},"title":"Process integralism","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 24, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Further on the integral theory front, I wanted to mention another angle on the Wilber-Whitehead conversation. Bonnitta Roy's article \"A Process Model of Integral Theory\" (pdf) in the December 2006 issue of Integral Review is a thought-provoking attempt to advance post-metaphysical integral theory further toward process thought and Dzogchen Buddhism\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1288,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/06\/09\/peirce-whitehead-hartshorne-process-relational-ontology\/","url_meta":{"origin":8777,"position":5},"title":"Peirce-Whitehead-Hartshorne &amp; process-relational ontology","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 9, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"The following are some working notes following up on my previous post on the relationship between Charles Sanders Peirce and Alfred North Whitehead, specifically on Peirce\u2019s logical\/relational\/phenomenological categories (firstness, secondness, thirdness) and Whitehead\u2019s notion of prehension and the \u201cactual occasion.\u201d It\u2019s become clear to me since writing that post that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"triple-cone-p211-english.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2010\/06\/triple-cone-p211-english.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8777"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8777\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10245,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8777\/revisions\/10245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}