{"id":8426,"date":"2015-11-06T12:26:18","date_gmt":"2015-11-06T17:26:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/?p=8426"},"modified":"2015-11-06T12:36:20","modified_gmt":"2015-11-06T17:36:20","slug":"wark-on-moores-capitalocene","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/11\/06\/wark-on-moores-capitalocene\/","title":{"rendered":"Wark on Moore’s Capitalocene"},"content":{"rendered":"

McKenzie Wark gets at some very\u00a0important issues in what we might call “the ontology of the Anthropocene” in this review<\/a> of Jason Moore’s book Capitalism in the Web of Life<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Moore’s work, as he acknowledges (and as I have argued here before), provides\u00a0an important contribution to rethinking the relations between humanity, the nonhuman world, and the techno-economic formations (such as capitalism) that have mediated those relations. But for Wark, Moore’s dialectical approach goes too far in the direction of social construction, whilst retaining the basic binary of nature and society that Moore critiques as “Cartesian.”<\/p>\n

Summarizing his critique, Wark writes:<\/p>\n

“The achievement of Moore\u2019s book is to move past a metaphysical concept of nature towards an historical one. But in the process the various scientific ways of knowing nature are not recognized as valid and at least partially autonomous. These are assumed to be merely internal to capital \u2013 while historical knowledge gets some mysterious, partial exemption from that constraint.”<\/p>\n

He agrees with Moore that we cannot adequately understand the human-nature relation without understanding the social and historical dynamics of capitalism, but he argues that<\/p>\n

“the reverse is true also, but where the other side of the chiasmus is not nature-in-general as a metaphysical concept, but an ensemble of sciences that know nature as something nonhuman, mediated through an inhuman apparatus of techniques, and only partially contaminated in its aims and metaphors by historically determinate social relations.”<\/p>\n

The point here is that the natural sciences need to be given their due —\u00a0not as unproblematic “discoverers” of reality, but as activities that despite<\/em> their “contamination” by social relations nevertheless retain something from their contact with the nonhuman, material worlds they study.<\/p>\n

Wark makes this argument through reference to two axes that, he notes, tend to get confused: the “substance\/relations axis” and the “metaphoric\/metonymic<\/a> axis.” Like the process-relational philosophy I have championed here, Moore’s approach (and Wark’s) is relational<\/em> rather than substantivist.\u00a0But, according to Wark, Moore’s\u00a0is also metaphorical<\/em> in its substitution of a master metaphor — dialectical interaction — for Descartes’ binary estrangement (of mind and matter, nature and culture, etc.). In the process, the underlying binary duality remains intact.<\/p>\n

Wark’s\u00a0alternative\u00a0is\u00a0a metonymic one, which is not about substitution<\/em> but about displacement<\/em>. While the difference between metaphor and metonymy harbors Freudian connotations for some literary theorists (thanks to Lacan<\/a>) — metaphor suppresses, while metonymy combines — and is therefore relevant to the debate between Lacanian philosophies of “lack” and Deleuzian philosophies of “abundance”<\/a>\u00a0— I prefer to refer them to a Peircian, triadic understanding of meaning-making. Metaphor here, very loosely speaking, is related to the icon<\/em>, which represents an object through similarity or\u00a0resemblance; metonymy to the index<\/em>, which represents through contiguity or causal relationship. (These aren’t exactly Peirce’s mappings of terms; I’m relying here in part on Roman Jakobson’s work on Peirce.)<\/p>\n

Missing so far in this discussion is the third element, Peirce’s symbol<\/em>, which represents not by resemblance nor by contiguity, but by habit or regularity. A symbol is less a thing than a kind<\/em> of thing — it is, in fact, a kind<\/em>. It, like the others, is also an active process — meaning always in the making, rather than meaning made. In this sense, Peircian semiotics is metonymic through and through, in that meaning or reference is always being transferred, always on the move from a here to a there. The difference is that the transferral can be a substitution (icon\/metaphor), a causal interaction\u00a0(index\/metonymy), or the development of a new habit and regularity (symbol\/sociality).<\/p>\n

I add “sociality” there to make the point that the social is, by definition, not one side of a binary opposed to the natural. The entire process<\/em> is social, or becomes<\/em> social in the establishment of regularities between entities (or signs, since for Peirce, all humans and other entitites are signs — at once\u00a0virtual, actual, and symbolic-logical).<\/p>\n

If Moore is substituting one metaphor for another in overcoming Cartesianism, and Wark is arguing for ways to think the human-nature relation as metonymic networks, translations and transferences (akin to Haraway’s cyborgs and Actor Network Theory’s hybrids) of something that is both more unified and more complex than a binary can encompass, the\u00a0third approach I want to suggest is a kind of meta-metonymic<\/em> one\u00a0that sees substitution, transference, and\u00a0pattern-making occurring all at once.<\/p>\n

Hence, there are (1) patterns that keep being repeated<\/em> because they resemble basic propensities built into the nature of things — such as those reflected in the binaries that we seem so unable to jettison (self\/other, us\/them, up\/down, male\/female, mind\/matter, nature\/culture), (2) patterns that get generated\u00a0through actual displacements<\/em> in material relations (such as the changes that occur with specific technological inventions — the internal combustion engine, and so on), and (3) patterns that emerge in and through systems of pattern-organization<\/em> that both precede, accompany, and\u00a0creatively<\/em> depart from<\/em> from the real changes in relations over time.<\/p>\n

The Anthropocene marks a recognition that the current political-ecological formation is unsustainable and rapidly endangering any humanly-viable futures. But the difficulty of thoroughly thinking<\/em>\u00a0the shift out of it to something more viable is a difficulty that will not be overcome until<\/em> we have arrived at the “elsewhere” that will itself be indicative of that shift. We won’t know it until we have emerged out the other side.<\/p>\n

What I am suggesting is that neither a substitution of metaphors (a la<\/em> Moore, in Wark’s critique) nor an empirical study of how things are all entangled in complex and changing relations (which is what Wark at times seems to be suggesting, and what Moore’s work actually helps us do) will alone do the trick for us.<\/p>\n

Earlier in the piece, Wark writes that<\/p>\n

“The virtue of the metonymic path is that it does not depend on a master metaphor and hence is a place from which one can put the very act of conceptual doubling<\/em>, with its play of mimesis and difference, under scrutiny<\/em> \u2013 a practice of which Haraway, for example, is well known.”<\/p>\n

What I’m getting at is this, but considered a bit more broadly. Placing all<\/em> of our acts — those of conceptual doubling and<\/em> those of\u00a0transference — under scrutiny, and indeed in abeyance <\/em>(while continuing to think and act), is part of what I think we will need to do before the next act, the shift from the (ill named) Anthropocene to whatever follows, will have been enacted. This will involve a lot of creative metaphorization and<\/em> translation, as well as a lot of experimentation in thinking and in practice, without guarantees of any particular results.<\/p>\n

The next collective move in that project may be how the nascent world community deals with\u00a0the coming Paris climate summit. More on that soon.<\/p>\n

\"Moore_-_Capitalism_in_the_Web_of_Life-max_221-28ccec2d6dcf167acd4733a0a8a74581\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

McKenzie Wark gets at some very\u00a0important issues in what we might call “the ontology of the Anthropocene” in this review of Jason Moore’s book Capitalism in the Web of Life. Moore’s work, as he acknowledges (and as I have argued here before), provides\u00a0an important contribution to rethinking the relations between humanity, the nonhuman world, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[688615,688977],"tags":[123667,348,123507,123668,306,16870],"class_list":["post-8426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anthropo_scene","category-geo_philosophy","tag-anthropocene","tag-capitalism","tag-capitalocene","tag-jason-moore","tag-mackenzie-wark","tag-peirce"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-2bU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8747,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2016\/05\/07\/wark-on-the-geopolitics-of-the-anthropocene\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":0},"title":"Wark on the geopolitics of the Anthropocene","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 7, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"McKenzie Wark has written a very provocative piece on the geopolitics of the Anthropocene, or what he calls \"The Geopolitics of Hibernation.\" A quote:\u00a0 \"Resource wars are no new thing. They are a defining feature of the history of geopolitics. But perhaps the resource wars of the Anthropocene have some\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Anthropocene"","block_context":{"text":"Anthropocene","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/anthropo_scene\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7686,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2014\/07\/07\/against-the-anthropocene\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":1},"title":"Against the Anthropocene","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"July 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The following is a guest post by Kieran Suckling, Executive Director of the nonprofit\u00a0Center for Biological Diversity. It follows the discussion begun\u00a0here\u00a0and in some\u00a0AESS conference sessions, including Andy Revkin's keynote talk\u00a0(viewable here)\u00a0and responses to it (such as\u00a0Clive Hamilton's).\u00a0 I In considering why the name \u201cAnthropocene\u201d has been proposed, why it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Anthropocene"","block_context":{"text":"Anthropocene","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/anthropo_scene\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"setting-sun-smokestacks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2014\/07\/setting-sun-smokestacks-275x179.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8235,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/05\/05\/speculative-ecologies-of-postcinema-talk\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":2},"title":"“Speculative Ecologies of (Post)Cinema” talk","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 5, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The video of my talk on \"Speculative Ecologies of (Post)Cinema: Cinema In and Beyond the Capitalocene,\" is now\u00a0up on Vimeo and at Shane Denson's web site. It is\u00a0from the SCMS panel \"Post-Cinema and\/as Speculative Media Theory,\" featuring Steven Shaviro,\u00a0Patricia Pisters, and Mark Hansen. I discuss the archive, the cloud, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cinema"","block_context":{"text":"Cinema","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/cinema_zone\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7645,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2014\/06\/12\/on-naming-the-anthropocene\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":3},"title":"On naming the Anthropocene","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The following are the comments I prepared for the roundtable \"The Arts and Humanities Respond to the Anthropocene.\" They follow in the line of critical thinking on the Anthropocene initiated by\u00a0gatherings like the Anthropocene Project (see here, here, and here, and some of the posts\u00a0at A(S)CENE) and journals like Environmental\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Anthropocene"","block_context":{"text":"Anthropocene","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/anthropo_scene\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HABITUS-9-medium-1024x682","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2014\/06\/HABITUS-9-medium-1024x682-275x183.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":11691,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2021\/03\/25\/the-traumatic-kernel-of-the-unfolding-storm\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":4},"title":"The traumatic kernel of the unfolding storm","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"March 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here are a few thoughts coming out of the five weeks of readings in decolonial theory that I\u2019m doing with my Advanced Environmental Humanities class (which has been online and open to the interested public). The course is centrally concerned with the present \"global moment,\" and the following can be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Manifestos & auguries"","block_context":{"text":"Manifestos & auguries","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/manifestos-and-auguries\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2021\/03\/hurricane-1200-x-628px.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2021\/03\/hurricane-1200-x-628px.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2021\/03\/hurricane-1200-x-628px.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2021\/03\/hurricane-1200-x-628px.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2021\/03\/hurricane-1200-x-628px.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":8170,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/03\/24\/the-orbis-spike\/","url_meta":{"origin":8426,"position":5},"title":"The Orbis spike","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"March 24, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"In an article in Nature entitled \"Defining the Anthropocene,\" geographers and climate scientists Simon Lewis and Mark Maslin provide a new\u00a0approach to dating this era that focuses on an event they call the \"Orbis spike,\" a dip in atmospheric CO2\u00a0occurring around 1610. Effectively, what their proposal does it to allow\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Anthropocene"","block_context":{"text":"Anthropocene","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/anthropo_scene\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orbis-spike","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2015\/03\/orbis-spike-275x117.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8426"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8442,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8426\/revisions\/8442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}