![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-iepaKiYQzVY\/UGIuXGIPqlI\/AAAAAAAAB-M\/uqxDt8WBSZI\/s1600\/revolution_s01e02_sc.jpg?resize=312%2C174\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
My upcoming talk<\/a> at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs comes from the East European strand of my research.<\/p>\n The talk will be called “Becoming Tuteishyi:<\/em> Peregrinations in the Zona<\/em> of Ukraine, with Walter, Gloria, Andrei, Bruno, and Other Explorers.”<\/p>\n The description reads as follows:<\/p>\n Drawing on the author\u2019s research and travels, this talk will consider Ukraine\u2019s ambiguous positioning within global cultural discourse by recourse to theories of borderlands (via Walter Mignolo and Gloria Anzaldua), hybridity and amodernity (via Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway), postcommunism and postcolonialism, and to images of anomalous zones and errant wanderings, with particular attention to Andrei Tarkovsky\u2019s Stalker<\/em>.<\/p>\n Here’s some background…<\/p>\n The word “tuteishyi” is a Ukrainian* word that literally means “from here” or “those who are from around here.” I’ve used it before<\/a> as an indicator of the borderland identities one finds in post-Soviet Eastern Europe, particularly at the European Union peripheries, and as an analogue to the “mestizos,” “creoles,” and hybrids celebrated by Latin American and other borderland theorists. The difference is that “tuteishyi” emplaces<\/em> its carrier in a way that mestizo, creole, et al., do not. Rather than a nomadism in movement<\/em> in a striated, territorialized world, it is a nomadism in place<\/em> in a moving world, a world where movement itself is territorialized.<\/p>\n (*More precisely, one could say that “tuteishyi” is a pre-<\/em>Ukrainian word, or a pre-anything<\/em> word: it is “pre-” to the identities that get constructed in processes of nation-building. In my experience, it’s used by people who live in the peripheries of Ukrainian ethnographic territory, where Ukrainian — or a language close to it — is spoken, but is not necessarily called<\/em> “Ukrainian,” because the 19th century nation-building movements that coalesced around the term “Ukrainian” bypassed these regions. Ruthenians\/Rusyns and Lemkos are among the ethnic affiliations who make up this not-quite-Ukrainian fringe.)<\/p>\n I’ll argue in this talk that “tuteishyi” can not only be considered a form of being,<\/em> a “being from around here” — an “essence” that is opposed to, and imposed upon, by imperial, national, or other kinds of constructive and territorializing (de\/reconstructive, de\/reterritorializing) projects — but that it could also be a form of becoming<\/em>. A becoming-tuteishyi<\/em> might avoid the kinds of dilemmas in which the “located” find themselves in a world of modern and postmodern delocalizing processes.<\/p>\n In Ukraine — as visible on the streets of Kyiv (Kiev) this past week — these include the dilemma of choosing between becoming-European<\/em> versus becoming-<\/em> (or remaining-) Eurasian<\/em> (Russian, Soviet, et al.).<\/p>\n Becoming-Ukrainian<\/em> is a third option, one that has been articulated by some as a point of national pride, a kind of new\/old Ukrainianism in a global cultural economy that — they hope or assume — makes room for such pride. (I’ve discussed a few of these articulations here,<\/a> here,<\/a> and here.)<\/a> It has also been incorporated, to varying extents, into the political projects of Ukrainian politicians, from the country’s first post-Independence president, Leonid Kravchuk, to Yulia Tymoshenko and others in today’s political elite.<\/p>\n (Tymoshenko, as is well known, has been in jail for over two years now because she is the main rival to current president Viktor Yanukovich. As for the latter’s moves toward and away from Europe and Russia, respectively, what can one say… except that in the face of a divided world, the unadulterated desire for power comes to look deeply schizophrenic.)<\/p>\n What, then, is a “becoming tuteishyi,” and how might it offer some compromise between becoming-European and becoming-Eurasian? And how might it be different from becoming-Ukrainian? That’s what I’ll try to answer in my talk. And I’ll do that by referring to Ukraine’s postcolonial<\/em> and amodern<\/em> conditions.<\/p>\n There’s been some writing in recent years about the similarities and differences between the postcolonial condition — as defined by Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Spivak, Walter Mignolo, Enrique Dussel, and others — and the “postcommunist” or “postsocialist” condition. (See, for instance, this special issue<\/a> of the Journal of Postcolonial Writing<\/em>.)<\/p>\n But there hasn’t been much linking the “amodernism” and “cosmopolitics” of Bruno Latour, Isabelle Stengers, and others (such as Haraway) to the post-Soviet world.<\/p>\n Chernobyl (Chornobyl, in Ukrainian) and its role in post-Soviet imaginaries of technology and ecology offer a particularly apt entry point for thinking about this nexus of meanings surrounding the modern, the postmodern, the premodern (as imagined,\u00a0for instance, by some nationalist Ukrainians), and the a<\/em>modern. (Adriana Petryna’s Life Exposed<\/a><\/em> moves into this territory somewhat.)<\/p>\n Made several years before the Chernobyl accident, Andrei Tarkovsky’s film Stalker<\/em> (1979) has provided one of the most commonly used templates for making sense of that accident. (I describe that in my book<\/a>, and here<\/a>.) I’ll argue that Stalker<\/em> and its Zone offer not only an evocative metaphor for the techno-ecological “in-betweenness” of the Chernobyl Zone — it’s a flourishing “bounced-back” ecosystem now, despite still measurable heightened radiation levels — but for Ukraine as a whole, an in-between Zona<\/em> into which a series of wanderers — like our Walter, Gloria, and Bruno — might find themselves drawn.<\/p>\n Ukraine is such a Zone as would compel and utterly perplex such theorizing wanderers. What might they have to say to it (this Zone) and each other? That’s my challenge.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The lovely image at the top is from the Romanian blog Spectatorial Gaze,<\/a> specifically from a post dedicated to Geoff Dyer’s wonderful book<\/a> on Tarkovsky’s Stalker, Zona<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" My upcoming talk at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs comes from the East European strand of my research. The talk will be called “Becoming Tuteishyi: Peregrinations in the Zona of Ukraine, with Walter, Gloria, Andrei, Bruno, and Other Explorers.” The description reads as follows: Drawing on the author\u2019s research and travels, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[196,688977],"tags":[58933,212,4420,16788,58937,58938,318,16902,58900],"class_list":["post-7066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecoculture","category-geo_philosophy","tag-amodernism","tag-chernobyl","tag-ecology","tag-latour","tag-mignolo","tag-postcolonialism","tag-tarkovsky","tag-ukraine","tag-zone"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-1PY","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6722,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/06\/19\/aar-panel-on-latours-gifford-lectures\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":0},"title":"AAR panel on Latour’s Gifford Lectures","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"The AAR panel responding to 2013 Holberg Prize winner Bruno Latour's Gifford Lectures has now been scheduled. Information is as follows. QUERYING NATURAL RELIGION: IMMANENCE, GAIA, & THE PARLIAMENT OF LIVELY THINGS Session A23-203 (Co-sponsors: Social Theory & Religion Cluster and Religion & Ecology Group) Saturday November 23 - 1:00\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Academe"","block_context":{"text":"Academe","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/academe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"http:\/\/lh5.ggpht.com\/--xAfcTWGDjA\/S7Vkj9ggieI\/AAAAAAAFu-4\/tPWceZDV1UI\/Bosch%25252C%252520Garden%252520of%252520Earthly%252520Delights%2525201510.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lh5.ggpht.com\/--xAfcTWGDjA\/S7Vkj9ggieI\/AAAAAAAFu-4\/tPWceZDV1UI\/Bosch%25252C%252520Garden%252520of%252520Earthly%252520Delights%2525201510.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8278,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/06\/09\/harmans-reply\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":1},"title":"Harman’s reply","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 9, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Graham Harman's reply to my critical response to his book Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political, which appeared as part of\u00a0a book symposium in\u00a0Global Discourse\u00a0earlier this year, is readable\u00a0online,\u00a0here.\u00a0 I won't address the details of that\u00a0reply here. Some of them relate to our divergent\u00a0interpretations of Latour, and since Harman has\u00a0now written\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Philosophy"","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13022,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2022\/10\/09\/r-i-p-bruno-latour\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":2},"title":"R.i.p., Bruno Latour","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"October 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Hearing the announcement of Bruno Latour's death earlier today, I remembered his visit to the Feverish World symposium, which I co-organized in 2018 in Burlington, Vermont. Despite his health (which was turning for the worse at the time), he participated gracefully in this strange mixture of conference, festival, and street\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Eco-theory"","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2022\/10\/image.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9881,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2018\/10\/28\/latours-terrestrial-project\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":3},"title":"Latour’s terrestrial project","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"October 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Review of Bruno Latour,\u00a0Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime,\u00a0Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2018. Down to Earth is in significant part a restatement of Bruno Latour\u2019s theorizing over the last few decades, made more incisive in the light of Trumpism (and other illiberal populisms) and brought to bear\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Climate change"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/climate-politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2018\/10\/51U4aOdufeL._SX317_BO1204203200_-176x275.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6700,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/05\/22\/stalking-the-book\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":4},"title":"Stalking the book…","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 22, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Teaching my film course (especially in its current rendition as \"Ecology Film Philosophy\") and the book that goes with it (Ecologies of the Moving Image, which will be publicly available in July) -- and especially teaching the Andrei Tarkovsky film Stalker, which serves as a sort of template for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cinema"","block_context":{"text":"Cinema","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/cinema_zone\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/24.media.tumblr.com\/tumblr_lm8hnuT66W1qhqfw3o1_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7078,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/12\/01\/ontologies-of-bilocation\/","url_meta":{"origin":7066,"position":5},"title":"Ontologies of bilocation","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"December 1, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"For interdisciplinary scholars, it's always a challenge to decide which conferences to attend and which to forgo. The problem is particularly acute when the conferences are held at the same time, as occurred last week with the annual meetings of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) and American Academy of Religion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Academe"","block_context":{"text":"Academe","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/academe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7066"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7093,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7066\/revisions\/7093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}