{"id":6778,"date":"2013-07-01T13:52:38","date_gmt":"2013-07-01T18:52:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/?p=6778"},"modified":"2013-07-01T13:52:38","modified_gmt":"2013-07-01T18:52:38","slug":"preparing-my-peirce-centennial-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/07\/01\/preparing-my-peirce-centennial-proposal\/","title":{"rendered":"Preparing my Peirce Centennial proposal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It will be <a href=\"http:\/\/peirce-foundation.org\/2014cfp.html\">quite an event<\/a> for Peirce scholars.<\/p>\n<p>My proposed paper will be on applications of Peirce to film theory, and in particular the two neo- (quasi-?) Peircian approaches that I present in <em>Ecologies of the Moving Image.<\/em> The first of these builds on Sean Cubitt&#8217;s three-part typology of the image (pixel&#8211;cut&#8211;vector, which I rework as spectacle&#8211;sequentiality&#8211;semiosis); I&#8217;ve written about it before on this blog and elsewhere. The second develops Peirce&#8217;s three normative sciences (aesthetics, ethics, logic) into a <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/03\/26\/aesthetics-peirce-in-the-santa-monica-mountains\/\">logo-ethico-aesthetics<\/a> of viewership.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a quick encapsulation of the latter:<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->1. <em>Aesthetics of firstness:<\/em> involves cultivating delight . . . in this, and that, and the next thing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">No questions asked here, only skillful perception of a thing in its naked reality. To be a good film viewer, or, more generally, to become skilled at becoming (human, or whatever), one must learn how to see, and hear, and feel what is there in a way that appreciates the thing(s) in itself (themselves).<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Ethico-aesthetics of secondness:<\/em> involves cultivating a dignifying responsiveness to encountered others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The question here is: <em>How do I respond to encountered others in a way that preserves and deepens the dignity of those involved in the encounter?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Viewing a film is a passive activity, when compared to interacting with others in daily life, so here it is a matter of evaluating a film based on the skills and capacities it allows us to practice and develop. How do we model, question, and engage with the characters presented in a film, including both the characters in the film-world itself and the implied and intended characters &#8212; the filmmakers, the represented (and unrepresented) communities, the audience communities? How do we do that with the film in our encounters and conversations with other viewers (or potential viewers)?<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Logo-ethico-aesthetics of thirdness:<\/em> involves cultivating the capacity to make sense of encounters through contextual reference, in widening contexts of meaning.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">This sense-making process always includes the sense made by others (in the past and in the present) and that made by those yet to come.\u00a0 Semiosis and logic, for Peirce, both have a forward momentum that is directed to future semiotic communities. For Peirce, scientific truth-seeking ought to be directed to discovering what would be acceptable to an ideal community of interpreters &#8212; a community that may never arrive, but always remains ahead of us as a possibility. Without that possibility (ideal, not actual), the quest for knowledge would be barren; with it, it remains open and viable. Logic, building on ethics and aesthetics, aims at this truth that is always to come.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Viewing a film, as with any activity, is not only a matter of making sense of the film (or specific activity), but also of making sense of the world. What in a film contributes to this sense-making task? How does it do so, and how do we take it up?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It will be quite an event for Peirce scholars. My proposed paper will be on applications of Peirce to film theory, and in particular the two neo- (quasi-?) Peircian approaches that I present in Ecologies of the Moving Image. The first of these builds on Sean Cubitt&#8217;s three-part typology of the image (pixel&#8211;cut&#8211;vector, which I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[688745,689701],"tags":[16876,468,23316,16870,58904],"class_list":["post-6778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cinema_zone","category-media_ecology","tag-aesthetics","tag-ethics","tag-logic","tag-peirce","tag-peirce-centennial-congress"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-1Lk","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1221,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/03\/26\/aesthetics-peirce-in-the-santa-monica-mountains\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":0},"title":"aesthetics &amp; Peirce in the Santa Monica Mountains","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"March 26, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"I like to follow extended think-fests (such as conferences) with brief flights away from cerebrality, at least for a couple of days where possible. So following the SCMS, I visited the Santa Monica Mountains, which included a hike up La Jolla Canyon and Mugu Peak at the northern end of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"santa-monica-mountains-m.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2010\/03\/santa-monica-mountains-m.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":10784,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2020\/06\/04\/eco-ethico-aesthetics-and-george-floyd\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":1},"title":"Eco-ethico-aesthetics and George Floyd","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"As I explain in Shadowing the Anthropocene, process-relational philosophy in a Peircian-Whiteheadian vein takes aesthetics to be first, ethics to be second, and logic (which, in our time, we need to think of also as eco-logic) to be third. This is not a temporal sequence, but a logical one: aesthetics\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cultural politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cultural politics","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/cultural_politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2020\/06\/43924569-tv-damage-bad-sync-tv-channel-rgb-lcd-television-screen-with-static-noise-from-poor-broadcast-signal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2020\/06\/43924569-tv-damage-bad-sync-tv-channel-rgb-lcd-television-screen-with-static-noise-from-poor-broadcast-signal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2020\/06\/43924569-tv-damage-bad-sync-tv-channel-rgb-lcd-television-screen-with-static-noise-from-poor-broadcast-signal.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2020\/06\/43924569-tv-damage-bad-sync-tv-channel-rgb-lcd-television-screen-with-static-noise-from-poor-broadcast-signal.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2020\/06\/43924569-tv-damage-bad-sync-tv-channel-rgb-lcd-television-screen-with-static-noise-from-poor-broadcast-signal.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4325,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/05\/30\/what-a-bodymind-can-do-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":2},"title":"What a bodymind can do &#8211; Part 3","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 30, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"This is the concluding part of a three-part article. Part 1 can be found here, Part 2 here. They should be read in the sequence in which they were published. \u00a0 The True, the Good, and the Beautiful All of this can be related to the triad of the True,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2011\/05\/trinity.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6398,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/07\/13\/the-conceptual-machine\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":3},"title":"The conceptual machine","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"July 13, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"I've always been more of an improviser than a long-range planner, but my job requires that I occasionally dabble in long-range projections of my work. Here's one. While a number of concerns have framed my scholarship over the years -- ethical, political, cultural, ecological, and theoretical concerns -- the philosophical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2983,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/03\/21\/artmonks-children-of-thoreau-whitehead\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":4},"title":"Artmonks: children of Thoreau &amp; Whitehead","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"March 21, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"If Thoreau's quest to \"live deliberately [...] and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived\" were cross-bred with A. N. Whitehead's insight that creativity is the driving core of all things in the universe, the \"universal of universals,\" then today's \"artmonks\" are children not of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Spirit matter&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Spirit matter","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/religion-spirituality\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8667,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2016\/02\/13\/follow-up-on-peirce-the-meremr-triad\/","url_meta":{"origin":6778,"position":5},"title":"Follow-up on Peirce &amp; the MER\/EMR triad","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"February 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"I shared my previous post on the Peirce-L discussion forum\u00a0and received about 16 responses in five days. The following is an edited version of the\u00a0summary response I sent to the forum\u00a0regarding the main comments presented there. I've\u00a0eliminated\u00a0names or substituted them with single initials where that seemed warranted. I've received about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Philosophy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Philosophy","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/geo_philosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6778"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6793,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6778\/revisions\/6793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}