{"id":2894,"date":"2011-03-08T11:05:11","date_gmt":"2011-03-08T16:05:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/?p=2894"},"modified":"2011-03-08T11:05:11","modified_gmt":"2011-03-08T16:05:11","slug":"cfp-rethinking-time-ecology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/03\/08\/cfp-rethinking-time-ecology\/","title":{"rendered":"cfp: Rethinking Time &amp; Ecology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CALL FOR PAPERS: Special Issue of Environmental Philosophy<\/p>\n<p>THEME: Temporal Environments: Rethinking Time and Ecology<\/p>\n<p>Details: <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>GUEST EDITORS: Jacob Metcalf (UC Santa Cruz) and Thom van Dooren (University of       Technology, Sydney)<\/p>\n<div>Place and space have received substantial attention in       environmental philosophy in recent decades. Theorists from a       variety of fields have proposed that reorienting our relationship       to the non-human world requires reconsideration of ways of       understanding and inhabiting spaces and places.       Ecophenomenologists have argued that replacing meaningful places       with abstract space was a critical moment in histories of       environmental destruction, and environmental ethics will require       re-imagining place as meaningful again. Bioregionalism has       emphasized the need to rethink our places as ecological       relationships, and inspired not only changes in academia, but also       in environmental movements such as food localism. In a related       vein, Val Plumwood has cautioned against too simplistic a notion       of \u201cone\u2019s place\u201d, critiquing the fracturing of place in which       cherished homeplaces are able to be preserved only as a result of       the destruction of less visible \u2018shadow places\u2019. In short, there       is a broad assertion that reassessing our obligations to       more-than-human worlds requires understanding place as more       meaningful than an empty space to be filled by human concerns.<\/p>\n<p>This special issue of Environmental Philosophy will present a       collection of articles that direct similar attention to the time       and temporality of environments, a topic that has been relatively       neglected by environmental philosophy and ethics. Although       environmental ethicists have long discussed temporal issues, such       as intergenerational justice, time has often been treated as an       essentially linear and static container for human action. But if       we conceive of time as produced, constructed, maintained, lived,       multiple, and a more-than-human concern, the possibilities for       environmental philosophy look dramatically different. This       collection will offer such a framework for thinking through time       and environment by exploring the multiple lived times present in       global climate change, species extinction, the practices of       ecological sciences, and the temporal fidelities of conservation       and restoration.<\/p>\n<p>Among the questions we hope this collection might explore are:       What philosophical reconsiderations of time might be available and       useful for other ecological disciplines? How does the pace of       human life\u2014 markets, science, desires, consumption\u2014impact our       ability to imagine and produce livable futures? How might we       remember different, and sometimes lost, ways of valuing human and       nonhuman worlds in a way that does not fetishize the past but       still holds it open as a resource for constructing better futures?       How does an attentiveness to the scope of evolutionary time alter       our sense of obligation in a time of massive biodiversity loss?       How does the high-speed pace of much human life actually make it       harder to change the conditions of those lives? How do humans and       other animals learn to justly co-inhabit our sometimes very       different temporalities? What ways of life are enabled or disabled       by different temporal metaphors? What post-colonial temporalities       are necessary for recuperation of cultural ecologies damaged by       genocides and ecocides? Will sustainable ecologies require new       models of temporality to reformulate growth, degrowth, and       regrowth?<\/p>\n<p>We invite submissions from environmental philosophers and other       ecological scholars, including reflective pieces from natural and       social scientists. Pieces that are grounded in specific cases of       temporal environments are especially encouraged. We welcome pieces       from international and native communities, and others not often       represented in philosophy journals.<\/p>\n<p>Environmental Philosophy (<a href=\"http:\/\/\/\">http:\/\/<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/ephilosophy.uoregon.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\">ephilosophy.uoregon.edu\/<\/a>)       is a peer-reviewed professional philosophy journal, and is the       official journal of the International Association of Environmental       Philosophy (IAEP). Environmental Philosophy publishes innovative       research relevant to all areas of environmental philosophy,       including ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, theology, politics,       ecofeminism, environmental justice, philosophy of technology, and       ecophenomenology.<\/p>\n<p>Target publication date: Spring 2012<br \/>\nAbstracts of 300-400 words, due by April 1, 2011<br \/>\nPapers due for review by August 1, 2011<\/p>\n<p>There are no word count restrictions, but submissions are       encouraged to aim for 6-8,000 words.<\/p>\n<p>For further information or to submit abstracts, please contact       Jacob Metcalf (<a href=\"mailto:jake.metcalf@gmail.com\" target=\"_blank\">jake.metcalf@gmail.com<\/a>) or Thom van Dooren (<a href=\"mailto:thom.van.dooren@gmail.com\" target=\"_blank\">thom.van.dooren@gmail.com<\/a>).<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CALL FOR PAPERS: Special Issue of Environmental Philosophy THEME: Temporal Environments: Rethinking Time and Ecology Details:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4415,688977],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecophilosophy","category-geo_philosophy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-KG","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1079,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/05\/30\/between-continental-environmental-philosophy\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":0},"title":"between continental &amp; environmental philosophy","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 30, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Responding to a post on this blog, Kvond, a little while ago, raised the question of the relationship between Arne Naess, originator of \u201cdeep ecology,\u201d and Spinoza \u2013 which made me think of the interesting if sporadic\/uneven\/episodic relationships between the main traditions of continental philosophy and environmental thought. A glance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-theory&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6643,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/04\/19\/ecology-film-philosophy\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":1},"title":"Ecology ~ Film ~ Philosophy","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"April 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's what I'm slated to teach this summer, for 3 weeks beginning May 20. Ecology - Film - Philosophy How have movies changed our perception of ourselves, the Earth, and the relationship between the two? How are they continuing to do that as we plunge into an era of digital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Media ecology&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Media ecology","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/media_ecology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2013\/04\/Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5737,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2012\/04\/29\/whiteheads-return-ecologys-boon\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":2},"title":"Whitehead&#8217;s return, ecology&#8217;s boon","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"April 29, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Ultimately, the thinking of speculative pragmatism that is activist philosophy belongs to nature. Its aesthetico-politics compose a nature philosophy. The occurrent arts in which it exhibits itself are politics of nature. \"The one-word summary of its relational-qualitative goings on: ecology. Activist philosophy concerns the ecology of powers of existence. Becomings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-theory&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2012\/04\/flock1-275x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1685,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/12\/19\/books-of-the-decade-in-ecocultural-theory\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":3},"title":"Books of the decade in ecocultural theory","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"December 19, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"What books, published over the last ten years, have contributed most cogently and profoundly to our thinking about the relationship between culture and nature, ecology and society? (That's to name just two of the dualisms this blog regularly throws into question.) Who have been the most important ecocultural theorists so\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2010\/12\/article-1268225-094368A3000005DC-346_964x641-275x182.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":8302,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/06\/23\/cinema-ecology-the-death-of-carbon-capitalism\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":4},"title":"Cinema, ecology, &amp; the death of carbon capitalism","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"June 23, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Rice University's\u00a0Center for Energy and Environmental Research in the Human Sciences\u00a0(CENHS) has made my Cultures of Energy talk available on their YouTube channel. It's a longer version of the material I presented\u00a0at the SCMS \"Post-Cinema\" panel. Here's the abstract: This paper thinks through the intersections of three developments: (1) the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cinema&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cinema","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/cinema_zone\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.youtube.com\/vi\/25_cwFE2vKI\/0.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1033,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/02\/26\/about-this-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":2894,"position":5},"title":"About this blog","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"February 26, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"An online space for environmental cultural theory, this weblog has two primary objectives: (1) To communicate about issues at the intersection of ecological, political, and cultural thought and practice, especially at the interdisciplinary junctures forming in and around the fields of ecocriticism , green cultural studies, political ecology, environmental communication,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Blog stuff&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Blog stuff","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/blog_stuff\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2894","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2894"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2899,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2894\/revisions\/2899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}