{"id":11589,"date":"2021-02-19T08:42:15","date_gmt":"2021-02-19T13:42:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/?p=11589"},"modified":"2021-06-10T08:33:42","modified_gmt":"2021-06-10T13:33:42","slug":"in-defense-of-ecological-metaphor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2021\/02\/19\/in-defense-of-ecological-metaphor\/","title":{"rendered":"In defense of ecological metaphor"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In my writing about media, I’ve been using the words “ecology” and “ecosystem” fairly liberally (for instance, here<\/a>). In a new piece called “The Limitations of the ‘News Ecosystem’ Metaphor<\/a>,” The Columbia Journalism Review’s Lauren Harris argues that this metaphor is misguided. She interviews media scholar Anthony Nadler, who has claimed that<\/a> the metaphor “naturaliz[es] current trends in the diffusion and development of news practices.” Its use “suggests ‘spontaneous, self-ordering principles’ in the news market obscuring all the social, political, and economic decisions that undergird the status quo.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I want to respond to that argument here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The argument is not a new one; some version of it has plagued the field of “media ecology” for as long as that field has existed (which it has, as a kind of interdisciplinary interloper into media studies scholarship since the early 1970s<\/a>). Debates over the aptness of the metaphor have only intensified<\/a> as an ecologically oriented media scholarship has grown. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The problem, as I see it, is not so much with the word “ecology” as it is with its popular connotations. Nadler essentially admits this in his interview, where he describes the metaphor of a media ecosystem as “invit[ing] us to think of the system as a bunch of individual actors competing” in a \u201csurvival of the fittest\u201d struggle that leads, of its own accord, to “growth” and “flourishing.” This slippage between competitive individualism and a kind of symbiotic holism, in his analysis, makes it difficult to see the social, political, and economic decisions and norms that shape media today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether popular thinking really reflects that understanding of “ecology” is not clear to me. The word is used in a wide variety of scholarly contexts — some of them biological, but others sociological (“human ecology”), psychological (“ecological perception,” which I wrote about recently<\/a>), and even linguistic<\/a> and economic<\/a>. Some of its popular<\/em> uses remain conditioned by the competitivism of classical Darwinian accounts of life, while others are more influenced by the holism of Gaia theory or the do-goodism of environmental virtuosity, where “ecology” acts as a signifier of “harmony” with scarcely a hint<\/a> of competition or struggle. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using the word today should reflect not only those popular connotations<\/a>, but also contemporary ecological science, which is complex<\/a> and not so easy to pigeonhole. Ecosystems, when they can even be identified as such, work in nonlinear ways. They do not always, and maybe not ever, attain the once-and-for-all stability of a “climax community<\/a>.” Ecosystems are in this sense “non-teleological<\/a>“: while they may reflect emergent, systemic features, they aren’t directed toward a specific end goal. It’s therefore unwarranted to presume that an economic system treated as “ecological” would be one where competition led “naturally” to the maximum flourishing of the whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ecosystems are made up of individuals doing their own thing, and while some of that “doing” looks like competition, other parts of it look more cooperative or symbiotic, even mutualistic. Most are simply statistical and emergent: what happens is a result of things settling into emergent patterns that find relative zones of stability punctuated by change and characterized by inherent dynamism. Reading social-Darwinist or neoliberal economic values into ecology is of course possible, but so is reading Kropotkinite anarchism, chaos theory<\/a>, and almost anything else. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

If there is an essence to ecology — or even just a “center of gravity” within the “family resemblances<\/a>” among the “language games<\/a>” the word features in — it arguably has something to do with relational networks or ensembles that, from an analytical perspective, are worth considering as (more or less) systemic unities. Things interact to create modelable wholes<\/em>. Scientifically speaking, the “modelable” part is probably key: if you can’t model it<\/a>, then you can’t really treat it as a system. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That’s how I think of the word when I use it, including in my work on three ecologies<\/a>. And in that respect, I think it’s quite defensible. That said, Nadler’s point about social, political, and economic decisions and norms is very important for understanding the “ecology of media.” They are, in fact, part<\/em> of that ecology, not outside of it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What’s more important, for the rendition of media ecology that I develop in my work, is that the media ecology that Nadler and other media scholars are describing is part of a broader<\/em> media ecology that is the world in general.<\/em> Just as “the economy” is part of a larger “ecology,” as the field of ecological economics<\/a> has argued for years, so “the media” are part of a larger world that is itself mediated<\/a> and mediatic<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technological systems we call “media” are extensions and transformers of how we perceive and respond to the world, a world that already includes political actors, social understandings, economic incentives, contractual agreements, design principles, and much more. Those<\/em> media are a subset of the broader category of media, which (in my rendition) are the technical, perceptual, and bodily modalities by which all things interact with other things. “Media” is simply a word for “mediating apparatuses,” which mediate via the shaping of perceptual and responsive capacities. Mediation is how things work<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We can focus on<\/a> what the things take themselves to be (i.e., on their autopoiesis or automorphism<\/em>, which add up to “social ecologies” of “I’s” and “you’s” and “us’s” and “them’s”), or on the things themselves in their measurable dimensions (i.e., their “material ecologies”). But if we ignore the mediatic relations by which they become, continually, then we won’t have a clear understanding of how they work. It just so happens that in our current human case that mediation takes place through complex technological systems, but there’s nothing teleological, preordained, or ontologically privileged and privileging about that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this sense, “media ecology” is not just a metaphor imported<\/em> from biology into a human, social, political, or technological domain. Media ecology is constitutive of that biological world as well. Where Nadler suggests the metaphor of a “built environment” is more useful for understanding media, I am suggesting that it works the other way, too: media constitute ecosystems and environments built by their constituent members, but so does biology itself. Both conceptions — of media and of biology — are radically constructivist<\/a> in that both are understood to be constituted by the actions and processes that make them up. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or, the metaphor is <\/em>the Zone<\/a> it is describing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In my writing about media, I’ve been using the words “ecology” and “ecosystem” fairly liberally. In a new piece called “The Limitations of the ‘New Ecosystem’ Metaphor,” The Columbia Journalism Review’s Lauren Harris argues that this metaphor is misguided. She interviews media scholar Anthony Nadler, who has claims that the metaphor “naturaliz[es] current trends in the diffusion and development of news practices.” Its use “suggests ‘spontaneous, self-ordering principles’ in the news market obscuring all the social, political, and economic decisions that undergird the status quo.” <\/p>\n

I want to respond to that argument here by presenting the case that “ecology” is not a metaphor imported from biology, but that it’s more like the other way around: “media ecology” is a description of the world of media as much as it is a description of the world of biology. Both media and biology are constituted by the actions and processes of their constituents. In this sense, it is not a metaphor but a way of seeing, and it’s more important to ensure we understand what it is we are looking at. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[196,4415,688977,4437],"tags":[4420,660288,660293,660289,4478,660291,660287,628562,660290,660292],"class_list":["post-11589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecoculture","category-ecophilosophy","category-geo_philosophy","category-science","tag-ecology","tag-ecosystem-metaphor","tag-ecosystem-science","tag-ecosystemics","tag-media-ecology","tag-media-ecosystems","tag-philosophy-of-ecology","tag-science-and-technology-studies","tag-systems-theory","tag-theory-of-ecology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-30V","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3770,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/04\/30\/for-a-moratorium-on-constructivism\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":0},"title":"For a moratorium on “constructivism”","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"April 30, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"I'd like to call a moratorium on the use of the word \"constructivism\" (or \"constructionism\") to refer only to social constructivism. (This post was prompted by Tim\u00a0 Morton's Object-Oriented Strategies for Ecological Art, but his point there is somewhat differently directed and mine addresses a more general issue that can\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Eco-theory"","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9151,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2017\/04\/03\/parsing-the-alternative-media-ecosystem\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":1},"title":"Parsing the “alternative media ecosystem”","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"April 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"We all know the media ecosystem has been changing rapidly, with media scholars scrambling to understand how and where things are headed.\u00a0\"Fake news\" and \"post-truth\" are the glib catchwords of the day; \"filter bubbles,\" \"echo chambers,\" \"ideological segregation,\" \"information cascades,\" \"algorithmic filtering\" (along with the all-encompassing \"Algoricene\"), and \"meme magic\"\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Media ecology"","block_context":{"text":"Media ecology","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/media_ecology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11165,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2020\/10\/26\/an-average-pandemic-era-pre-election-sunday\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":2},"title":"An average (pandemic-era, pre-election) Sunday","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"October 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"I've begun posting updates on media coverage related to the U.S. presidential election (and related issues, such as social media disinformation) on my blog e2mc, which I've restarted to accompany my course \"Media Ecologies and Cultural Politics.\" Here is the latest post, which summarizes some key stories from yesterday's Sunday\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Media ecology"","block_context":{"text":"Media ecology","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/media_ecology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/e2mc\/files\/2020\/10\/1603632404_the_new_york_times_-_oct_25_2020_downmagaz_com-edited.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6643,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/04\/19\/ecology-film-philosophy\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":3},"title":"Ecology ~ Film ~ Philosophy","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"April 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's what I'm slated to teach this summer, for 3 weeks beginning May 20. Ecology - Film - Philosophy How have movies changed our perception of ourselves, the Earth, and the relationship between the two? How are they continuing to do that as we plunge into an era of digital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Media ecology"","block_context":{"text":"Media ecology","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/media_ecology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2013\/04\/Eco-Film-Phil-poster-2013-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4509,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2011\/05\/31\/integral-ecology-schedule\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":4},"title":"Integral Ecology schedule","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 31, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"The Integral Ecology reading group schedule has been announced, with Michael at Archive Fire leading the charge (with the announcement; Adam at Knowledge Ecology with the actual hosting). The schedule is as follows: June 1 \u2013 7 Introduction\/Chapter 1 - The Return of Interiority and Conceptual Framework of Integral Ecology\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Eco-culture"","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7066,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2013\/12\/01\/toronto-talk-ukraines-anomalous-zone\/","url_meta":{"origin":11589,"position":5},"title":"Toronto talk: Ukraine’s anomalous Zone","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"December 1, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"My upcoming talk at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs comes from the East European strand of my research. The talk will be called \"Becoming Tuteishyi: Peregrinations in the Zona of Ukraine, with Walter, Gloria, Andrei, Bruno, and Other Explorers.\" The description reads as follows: Drawing on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Eco-culture"","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/-iepaKiYQzVY\/UGIuXGIPqlI\/AAAAAAAAB-M\/uqxDt8WBSZI\/s1600\/revolution_s01e02_sc.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11589"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11605,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589\/revisions\/11605"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}