{"id":1063,"date":"2009-04-26T10:13:52","date_gmt":"2009-04-26T15:13:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/04\/26\/green-frames-nudges\/"},"modified":"2009-04-26T10:13:52","modified_gmt":"2009-04-26T15:13:52","slug":"green-frames-nudges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/04\/26\/green-frames-nudges\/","title":{"rendered":"green frames &amp; nudges"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/indexes\/2009\/04\/19\/magazine\/\">Green Mind<\/a>&#8221; issue of the New York Times Magazine shows how behavioral science is making an impact on environmental policy and decision-making. In particular, Jon Gertner&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/04\/19\/magazine\/19Science-t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=magazine\">Why Isn&#8217;t the Brain Green?&#8221; <\/a>provides a useful summary of how the trendy fields of behavioral economics and &#8216;decision science&#8217; are being applied to thinking about climate change. Gertner discusses the differences between analytical and emotional responses to risk; how the ordering of options shapes our choices; the ways that &#8220;frames&#8221; and &#8220;nudges&#8221; can be used to shape policy debates; and the effects of group dynamics on shaping individual decision-making. (It&#8217;s not that hard to get random individuals to cooperate in groups, and individuals in fact find it easier to think about long-term impacts of decisions when they are in face-to-face groups; but the article doesn&#8217;t get into how individuals, in a highly individualistic society like ours, can be encouraged to <em>follow up on<\/em> what they agreed to when they were making decisions in groups.)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nRichard Thaler and Cass Sunstein are quoted on their &#8220;nudges&#8221;. (Sunstein is Obama&#8217;s nominated head of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs &#8212; which tells us that we&#8217;ve thankfully moved well away from the Bush administration&#8217;s John Poindexter-led <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Information_Awareness_Office\">Information Awareness Office<\/a>, with its Total Information Awareness Program &#8212; remember that? On the other hand, government &#8220;nudging&#8221; is just a kinder, gentler form of social engineering; it doesn&#8217;t eliminate the need for the broader coalitional politics the green movement needs to remain effective.) Nudges, as Gertner puts it, &#8220;structure choices so that our natural cognitive shortcomings don\u2019t make us err&#8221; (by which he means make poor decisions, and not just decisions the structurers don&#8217;t want us to make). Frames &#8220;nudge people by using sophisticated messages, mined from decision-science research, that resonate with particular audiences or that take advantage of our cognitive biases.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Gertner discusses the issue of a carbon tax versus a cap-and-trade system with a couple of researchers, David Hardisty and Baruch Fischhoff, whose work suggests that a carbon tax <em>could <\/em>become palatable to Americans (including Republicans) is it were framed as a carbon &#8220;offset,&#8221; with the added fee going to finance specific types of projects (alternative energy and carbon reduction, etc.). The problem, though, is that, as Gertner puts it,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The order of the thoughts matters \u2014 early thoughts seem to sway our opinion, biasing subsequent thoughts to support the early position. For Republicans in the experiment who considered a carbon tax, their early thoughts were strongly negative [. . .] Yet for the same group, the word \u201coffset\u201d actually changed the way subjects proc\u00adessed their choice. In their thinking, they considered the positive aspects of the offset first \u2014 the financing of clean en\u00adergy \u2014 and found the overall evidence positive and acceptable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Okay, shhh, let&#8217;s not mention a carbon tax anymore. We meant an offset&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This embrace of behavioral research is good news for the burgeoning field of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservationpsychology.org\/\">conservation psychology<\/a>, which is the term that seems to be catching on for what might have been called environmental psychology or ecopsychology but, for various reasons, isn&#8217;t. (Environmental  psychology has been around for decades and is too broad a term; ecopsychology is too specific, referring usually to a therapeutic and political practice based in biocentric environmentalism.) Susan Clayton&#8217;s and Gene Myers&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservationpsychology.org\/\">conservation psychology<\/a> website is an excellent place to start with this field, and their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wiley.com\/WileyCDA\/WileyTitle\/productCd-1405176784.html\">forthcoming textbook <\/a>looks like it will be a good primer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week&#8217;s &#8220;Green Mind&#8221; issue of the New York Times Magazine shows how behavioral science is making an impact on environmental policy and decision-making. In particular, Jon Gertner&#8217;s &#8220;Why Isn&#8217;t the Brain Green?&#8221; provides a useful summary of how the trendy fields of behavioral economics and &#8216;decision science&#8217; are being applied to thinking about climate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":99,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[196,691215],"tags":[4412,292,4454],"class_list":["post-1063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecoculture","category-politics_postpolitics","tag-ecomedia","tag-environmental-communication","tag-neuropolitics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4IC4a-h9","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1073,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/05\/20\/lakoffs-environmental-frames-vs-connollys-resonance-machines\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":0},"title":"Lakoff&#8217;s environmental frames vs. Connolly&#8217;s resonance machines","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"May 20, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"In Why Environmental Understanding, or \"Framing,\" Matters, published today on the Huffington Post (and on AlterNet), liberal framing guru George Lakoff provides a useful critique of a forthcoming EcoAmerica report on the framing of environmental and climate change issues. While his conclusions are perceptive and make the article a valuable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Descartes3.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/files\/2009\/05\/Descartes3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1175,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2010\/01\/11\/neuropolitics-environmental-communication\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":1},"title":"neuropolitics &amp; environmental communication","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"January 11, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"My article \"From Frames to Resonance Machines: The Neuropolitics of Environmental Communication\" is coming out in the next issue of Environmental Communication. Here's the abstract: George Lakoff\u2019s work in cognitive linguistics has prompted a surge in social scientists\u2019 interest in the cognitive and neuropsychological dimensions of political discourse. Bringing cognitive\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6197,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2012\/09\/18\/cfp-thinking-acting-ecologically\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":2},"title":"CFP: Thinking &amp; Acting Ecologically","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"September 18, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"The International Society for Environmental Ethics (ISEE) presents the Tenth Annual Meeting on Environmental Philosophy, to be held 12-14th of June 2013 at The University of East Anglia, UK. \u201cThinking and Acting Ecologically\u201d The ISEE invites submissions on any topic in environmental philosophy \/ ecophilosophy broadly conceived. The focus of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-theory&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-theory","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecophilosophy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8908,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2016\/07\/30\/anthropocenic-sublime\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":3},"title":"Anthropocenic sublime","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"July 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"I'll be giving the following talk at the \"Popular Culture, Religion, and the Anthropocene\" workshop\u00a0at the National University of Singapore this coming week. Navigating the Zone of Alienation: Chernobyl and the Anthropocenic Sublime Abstract: This two-part talk will interpret the Chernobyl nuclear accident and its \u201cZone of Alienation\u201d (Zona vidchuzhennia)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Anthropocene&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Anthropocene","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/anthropo_scene\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1134,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2009\/10\/15\/ostroms-nobel-the-commons-blog-flow\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":4},"title":"Ostrom&#8217;s Nobel, the commons, &amp; blog flow","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"October 15, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Several days of silence calls for at least a whimper of sound here... I've been on the road (Washington, DC, Boston, and tomorrow Montreal) and writing for crisp deadlines in amidst the travel. And I'm still uncertain as to whether it's better to post little snippets just to keep the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Eco-culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Eco-culture","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/ecoculture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8394,"url":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/2015\/09\/18\/eco-humanities-glossolalia\/","url_meta":{"origin":1063,"position":5},"title":"Eco-humanities glossolalia","author":"Adrian J Ivakhiv","date":"September 18, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"I've just come across the earliest outline I wrote for the course I'm currently teaching (in its third incarnation), \"Environmental Literature, Arts, and Media.\" The course has also turned into a book project I'm working on, which will be a thematic primer to the environmental arts and humanities.\u00a0Both course and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Academe&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Academe","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/category\/academe\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/99"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}