{"id":1096,"date":"2022-03-16T03:30:47","date_gmt":"2022-03-16T07:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv-ukrtaz\/?p=1096"},"modified":"2022-03-16T03:30:47","modified_gmt":"2022-03-16T07:30:47","slug":"laruelle-on-putins-ideological-pasturelands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uvm.edu\/aivakhiv-ukrtaz\/2022\/03\/16\/laruelle-on-putins-ideological-pasturelands\/","title":{"rendered":"Laruelle on Putin’s ideological pasturelands"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Historian and political scientist Marlene Laruelle<\/a> is unquestionably one of the leading western experts on Russian political thought. She has authored and edited numerous volumes including Russian Nationalism: Imaginaries, Doctrines and Political Battlefields<\/em> <\/a>(2018, and available in open-access<\/a>), Understanding Russia: The Challenges of Transformation<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(2018),\u00a0Entangled Far Rights: A Russian-European Intellectual Romance in the 20th Century<\/em><\/a> (2018), and Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire<\/em><\/a> (2008). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In her <\/em>new essay for UnHerd<\/em>, “The brains behind the Russian invasion<\/a>,” Laruelle takes on what for some is the all-important question, “Who is the President’s Rasputin?” She examines several key candidates for such an ideological whisperer — Ivan Ilyin, Lev Gumilev, Alexander Dugin, Konstantin Malofeev, the Russian Orthodox Church’s Bishop Tikhon, the Moscow Patriarchate itself, and Putin’s close friend Yuri Kovalchuk — but argues instead that <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reality is more complex: there are multiple ideological sources who have blended to cause the disastrous invasion, all mediated through his \u201ccourt\u201d of\u00a0 trusted people and group of military advisers, and many of whom unite in their\u00a0vision of Ukraine as a country that needs to be brought back by force into Russia\u2019s orbit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

More complex, then, but in some ways also more banal, in that the sources of Putin’s impulses may be much more broadly cultural:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like many of his fellow citizens, [Putin is] probably saturated by political talk shows cultivating anti-Ukrainian feelings, as well as by patriotic movies celebrating the Russian Empire\u2019s greatness and its territorial conquests. There may be no need then to look for a doctrinal text that would have inspired him, as the memory of Russia\u2019s empire and the subordinated role of Ukrainians in it permeates so many components of Russian cultural life<\/em>.<\/p>

Putin\u2019s worldview has been built up over many years, and is more shaped by his personal resentment toward the West than by any ideological influence. Readings of the classic works of Russian philosophy which insist on Russia\u2019s historical struggle with the West, emphasise the role of Ukraine as a civilizational borderland between both, have simply reinforced his own lived experience.\u00a0[emphasis added]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Why, then, such a seemingly disastrous decision to invade a country that will fight tooth-and-nail against the invasion? She blames this on “low-level intelligence-gathering.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And it is here that the President\u2019s mask slips. It becomes clear that Putin is an aging and isolated authoritarian leader surrounded by advisers afraid of bringing him a realistic assessment of the likelihood of victory, thereby accelerating Russia dragging a sovereign Ukraine along with the rest of Europe towards the worst catastrophe since the Second World War.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The entire article<\/a> is worth reading. It’s accompanied by a video interview with Laruelle carried out by UnHerd<\/em>‘s Freddie Sayers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n