UVM Extension AgEngineering Blog
Posted: May 13th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
Posted: March 11th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
Vermont’s Comprehensive Energy Plan calls for obtaining 90% of the state’s energy from renewable sources by 2050 and reduce greenhouse gas emissions 50% from a 1990 baseline. What role can Vermont’s food system play in advancing this goal?
The Energy Cross-cutting Team of the Farm to Plate Network has released seven Energy Success Stories that showcase farms, businesses, vendors, installers, and technical assistance providers that have made a difference with energy efficiency savings and renewable energy production.
The stories were prepared by JJ Vandette and staff at Efficiency Vermont, Chris Callahan from UVM Extension, Alex DePillis from the Agency of Agriculture, and Sarah Galbraith and Scott Sawyer at VSJF. Funding for the project was provided by the Northeast Dairy Sustainability Collaborative (Ben & Jerry’s, Cabot Creamery Cooperative, Organic Valley, Stonyfield, Vermont Agency of Agriculture, and the Sustainable Food Lab).
The seven Energy Success Stories are the first in a series of resources that will highlight farms and businesses throughout Vermont’s food system that have made significant progress in saving energy and producing renewable energy.
The first 7 Energy Success Stories can be found on the Atlas at these links:
- Efficiency on a Dairy Farm: Brace Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/20
- Efficiency at a Dairy Processor: Commonwealth Dairy – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/25
- Solar Energy on a Dairy Farm: McKnight Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/21
- Wind Energy on a Dairy Farm: Blue Spruce Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/23
- Digester on a Dairy Farm: Maxwell’s Neighborhood Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/22
- On-Farm Biodiesel Production: Borderview Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/24
- On-Farm Heating with Biomass: River Berry Farm – http://www.vtfoodatlas.com/story/detail/26
They can also be downloaded as PDFs here:
Posted: March 4th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
I recently built a humidifier I think others might find useful. This could be useful for cheese aging, meat curing, and storage of winter crops all of which require maintaining specific temperature and humidity. The details are available on the Tool Wiki at FarmHack. Take a look, and let me know if you find ways to improve it or if you have any questions. As part of this project I also developed this handy spreadsheet that calculates relative humidity based on dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperature and/or calculates wet-bulb temperature based on dry-bulb temperature and relative humidity. The spreadsheet also helps you tailor the humidifier design to your needs by estimating humidification capacity in gallons of water evaporated per 24 hours.
The idea was to turn a 5 gallon bucket into a high capacity (4 gal/day), automatic fill humidifier. The bucket serves as a reservoir for the water and also as a mounting platform for the parts required to operate the humidifier. Water heated to a know temperature will transfer a predictable amount of water vapor to an air stream of a known temperature and humidity (wet bulb temperature). We use this property to develop a highly controlled humidifier using a temperature control to sense water temperature and control the heater, tank deicer for heat, and a CPU fan for air flow. We also add a toilet fill valve to the assembly to allow for automatic fill of the humidifier.
Posted: March 4th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
Yesterday we held our annual Oilseed Producer’s Meeting. At this meeting, I presented an economic overview of oilseeds in Vermont. Ina nutshell, Vermont has an installed on-farm biodiesel capacity of 600,000 gal/yr (5 sites) with a normalized initial cost of $1/gal of capacity (better than national average). Fuel can be produced for an average cost of $2.13/gal, and meal can be produced at an average cost of $340/ton. The greenhouse gas emissions associated with this model are 60-100% better than US avg oilseed production (net sink) while the average energy return on energy invested (EROEI) is 4 to 1 (i.e. 4 gallons produced for every gallon used in production. The model is on-farm production for on-farm use; i.e. cost avoidance.
This study made use of the Vermont Oilseed Cost and Profit Calculator, a tool we have developed over the years to collect all the enterprise costs associated with an on-farm oilseed operation that may turn the crop into meal, oil, and/or biodiesel. It helps growers and others interested in the topic arrive at specific product costs and compare those costs to market prices. We also have summarized three different likely oilseed enterprise scenarios in e report titled Vermont On-Farm Oilseed Enterprises: Production Capacity and Breakeven Economics. This work has had strong support from the Vermont Bioenergy Initiative of the Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund and has been accomplished in close cooperation with the UVM Extension Northwest Crops and Soils Program.
Posted: March 2nd, 2014 by Chris Callahan
We recently completed a series of small scale oilseed press evaluations related to on-farm oilseed processing. The video below summarizes the different presses and a full report is available for download.
Posted: March 2nd, 2014 by Chris Callahan
Across the Fence, the longest running daily farm and home television program in the country, joined us when we were harvesting last summer with the UVM Mobile Hops Harvester. In this segment, hear from Nick Aleria of Yellow Dog Hopyard in Cabot. VT and Matt Nadeau of Rock Art Brewery in Morrisville, VT about how local hops are important to their businesses and how the machine has helped this to be feasible. Across the Fence is a 15 minute program produced by University of Vermont Extension. The program airs weekdays at 12:10 pm on WCAX TV, Channel 3.
Posted: January 27th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
Posted: January 7th, 2014 by Chris Callahan
I recently presented a summary of mechanical hop harvesters at the 2013 NEHA Hops Conference in Morrisville, NY. As I prepared that material I was struck by how far we’ve come since 2010. In just three years since our small team embarked upon the development of the UVM Mobile Hops Harvester, several independently designed mechanical harvesters have become available and several builds of the UVM type harvester have also been developed by others. These are summarized in the presentation file linked above including videos of some of them.
Does Mechanical Harvesting Pay?
I also thought it may be helpful to show the impact of mechanical harvesting on a small hop farm. The reality is that hand picking hops is only realistic early in the development of a hop farm and only at very small scales of production. It depends on the interest of the pickers and the community atmosphere that many growers develop around their young enterprises. However, it is unlikely that the hand picking can support larger volume production at current labor rates and the rate of harvest will also be slower than necessary for preserving maximum hop quality.
So how expensive is a mechanical harvester? And can it actually pay for itself? Let’s do the numbers.
Assume a machine cost of $20,000, assembled, installed and ready to go (actual costs for the available machines are included in the presentation file above). Let’s say that machine is capable of harvesting 60 bines per hour (a light load for most) and that each bine is yielding 1 dry pound of hops. Let’s also assume 1000 bines per acre, and a one acre yard. We’ll look at high volume scenarios later. The benefit of mechanical harvesting is labor savings, so we need to assume the base case is paid hand picking at a wage of $7.25 per hour and a rate of 1 dry pound per hour (about one bine). Let’s also note that the machine might require 4 people vs. the one person we’re comparing it to, so it has a higher “per hour” labor rate. We’ll also assume that the machine has a life of 20 years, over which it’s initial cost is spread (as though it is being depreciated like other assets).
We have to make one simplification to the calculation before proceeding. We need to assume a common gross profit prior to harvest. In other words, the cost of the yard structure, the rhizomes, water, nutrients, any pest and disease management, etc. is all the same between the two cases and allows for a gross profit of, say, $10 per dry pound. With all that laid out, we can summarize the case as shown in the following table.
|Density||1000||bines per acre|
|Plant yield||1||dry pound per bine|
|Gross profit prior to harvest||$10.00||per dry pound|
|Machine rate||60||bines per hour|
|Labor cost||$7.25||per hour|
|Hand picking rate||1||bines per hour|
|Machine harvest cost||$1.48||per dry pound|
|Hand picking cost||$7.25||per dry pound|
|Mechanical advantage||$5.77||per dry pound|
|Simple payback period|
Admittedly, we can argue over the assumptions presented here. A machine could cost more to build or buy than I have assumed. Someone may be able to hand pick much quicker than I have presented. The machine rate could (and probably will be) higher than assumed above. The gross profit of $10 per dry pound assumed may be more or less. But I think it is safe to say that mechanical harvesting can pay for itself and, perhaps as important, allows a certain scale and quality of production that isn’t supported by hand picking.
Posted: October 24th, 2013 by Chris Callahan
The UVM Mobile Hops Harvester visited six hop yards this year, harvesting approximately 400 dry pounds of hops, over a 4 week period plus harvesting the UVM Extension NW Crops and Soils Team’s research hop yard. This harvester, developed as a result of a Northeast Hops Alliance, UVM Extension, VT Agency of Ag Food and Markets, and MA Department of Agriculture sponsored project, aims to provide proof of concept of a mobile hops harvester in support of the re-emerging hop industry in the Northeast US.
The reintroduction of hops to the northeast requires scale-appropriate harvest and processing equipment. At the start of this project there was no feasible mechanized harvest options for a 1-2 acre hop producer. Handpicking is the most wide-spread current practice which is labor intense and time consuming leading to expense and quality impact due to delayed harvest.
As a result of this project, cooperative use of a single, mobile harvester has been demonstrated and logistics for this operation are being continually improved. The harvester has a demonstrated capacity of 60-120 bines per hour compared to 1 bine per hour per person for manual picking. This rate enables the harvest of a 1 acre yard within 8 hours resulting in optimal harvest timing and improved quality. Assuming a harvest team of 4 people in either case, this translates to a harvest labor cost savings of 97% or $3,120 per acre at $15 per hour wage (approximately $2 per lb of dried hops (10-20% of retail price)).
“The hop harvester significantly sped up harvesting. With the size of the bines this year, some may not have been harvested at all without it’s use. Knowing the UVM harvester is available helps me plan for hopyard expansion over time. Without a large harvester, such a UVM’s, expansion would not be practical.”, notes Kris Anderson of Addison Hop Farm in Addison, VT.
Trevor Lewis of Mad Mountain Hop Farm in Berlin, VT concurs, “Absolutely amazing! My harvest time went from 5 days to 5 hours! Though I am unsure of expansion at this time, this machine makes it possible to expand beyond a half acre which really isn’t an option without a harvester.”
This mobile, trailer-based mechanized hop-harvester was developed and documented as an open-source design for others to replicate and adapt to their needs. The design was the result of a collaborative design effort involving growers, brewers, agronomists, fabricators and engineers. Additionally, 255 people have downloaded the plans for the machine and 5 others have built harvesters at least partially informed by this work. This harvester pulls a complete bine (central bine/vine, leaves and cones) through a section of stripping fingers that separate the cones and leaves from the bine. The cones and leaves are conveyed to a secondary sorting section with rolling dribble belts against which the leaves lie flat while the cones roll backward down the belts. In this way the machine takes a loaded bine and produces two output streams of cones and leaves.
We’ve been reasonably pleased with capacity and efficiency of the machine. There is still room for improvement, and we plan to install chutes and fences over the winter to better contain all matter within the machine, improve separation and, thus, net yield. We also had two bearings fail this harvest season and will likely upgrade them to heavier duty bearing housings.
The entire machine is placed on an 18 foot equipment trailer for ease of transport. This year, the machine traveled approximately 3,400 miles visiting some yards multiple times as different varieties matured. Each year, the harvester travels further afield for an outreach demonstration. This year we traveled to Westfield, Maine (Aroostook County) to Aroostook Hops to help with their harvest and to give them some experience with the harvester.
“Having the UVM mobile hops harvester had a HUGE impact on our success this year. We had a hops picking party the previous weekend (Labor Day) with many volunteers handpicking hops (we estimate about 60 people passed through that weekend) and we got about 40% of our crop harvested,” says Krista Johnston, ” We had two articles in the local press about us and lots of interest was generated, so we couldn’t have done better on “many hands”, but without the harvester here the following weekend we could not have gotten all the hops in this season by handpicking alone.”
Krista and her husband, Jason are thinking ahead to building a harvester of their own.
“We plan to fabricate a version of the mobile machine, so being able to use it ourselves and have our fabricators come out and operate it (for about 2 hours of time x two men) was absolutely invaluable to us. We had thought that “mobile” was less important to us and that we would build stationary with electric motors, but seeing how convenient it was to move around different locations made us reconsider that. Also, we recently expanded (last year) 3 acres so can’t even think about getting bigger any time too soon, but having the capacity to harvest at the rate that the harvester can accomplish will remove that as a limiting factor when we catch our breath and consider future operations. We do plan to contract our harvester to other growers, and had thought we’d have bines come to us, but mobile is looking attractive.”
Others have replicated and adapted the UVM design to their needs for the 2013 harvest season.
“We wouldn’t have been able to build our harvester without the knowledge and research from the UVM machine,” says Dean Heltemes of Lunatic Fringe Farms in Wisconsin. “I’m sure this picker will create a lot of buzz around our co-op. We might have the opportunity to do some harvesting for a farm a couple hours from here. The more hours we can get on this thing, the better off we will be for next year.” Video of Lunatic Fringe Farms’ harvester can be viewed on YouTube.
And so it goes, each year more hours are accrued on the harvester, more variations are built and we all continue to learn and improve together using this open source design. Plans for the machine can be downloaded from the UVM Hops Project Wiki at http://www.uvm.edu/extension/cropsoil/wikis. Chris Callahan can be reached by email or phone at 802-773-3349.
Posted: August 30th, 2013 by Chris Callahan
UVM Extension with support from the USDA’s Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program will offer five one-day workshops on crop storage throughout Vermont this fall. Workshops will focus on long-term storage of crops for sale through the winter and into early spring, but will be relevant to many agricultural and food storage needs.
- the growing importance of long-term crop storage
- principles of energy and heat transfer
- basic heating and refrigeration
- construction for utility and efficiency
- maintaining temperature, airflow and humidity
- biological processes of crops in storage
- storage characteristics of various crops, and
- sizing and design of storage systems.
- Brattleboro – 9/17
- Rutland – 9/19
- White River Junction – 10/9
- St. Johnsbury – 10/10
- Shelburne – 10/16